Look at that anons, new BVs deleting shit already
>How many uncle joes?
wait, so it is ok for new ownership to delete porn spammers, but not me. Ok I get it.
>Oh look, it's OSS team shithead complaining about new BV doing his job.
>Did he fucking delete shit that was already notabled like OSS did constantly? No? Just spam and possibly illegal crap?
>Quit whining and get lost team shithead, you fucked the board for months.
But, according to you guys this is a free speech board I thought, nothing gets deleted I thought? Narrative collapsing very fast.
>It's not ok to delete legit posts and ban legit anons.
provide sauce of any legit research I ever deleted, I'll wait, and now you can't say no reason to but I'll just delete the evidence. I can't delete your proof now, so show it.
Suddenly avoiding a ban for spamming is not a reasonable reason to ban. Hot take.
Suddenly>>15368042
avoiding a ban for spamming is not a reasonable reason to ban. Hot take.>Nobody becomes an impediment to the plan. If they do they are removed. Anons are the reason for all the infrastructure that supports them, not the other way around. Anons have a special arrangement with Q+. Anons have walkon script creative control for tactical popups. Anons, do you realize you matter to Q+ as real unvarnished intel?
>C'mon anons. Get with it.
>1 year delta on these drops which may or may not be Q.
>Anons, you decide
kek, that didn't take long.