>Marine Corps Captain Thomas Wheeler
Well that is an easy answer to if RRN is completely fake or not. Which anon is going to call him?
You can blindly follow as long as you like, but Trumps stupidity on vaxes is out in the open at this point. He is creating enmity between himself and his base, which is his prerogative, but his base could not give a rats ass whether the military like Trump or not on vaxes. A large portion of his bases just plain categorically disagrees with Trump on vaxes, and your and his turning a blind eye because you both think this base has no better option is a YUGE misreading of the situation.
That argument was semi plausible when there was not significant data on who ineffective and harmful the vax is. If a placebo had been given to people and it broke the mass psycosis on the pandemic, great, but that is not what happened or is happening.
So as you say
Think.
>Trump activated the Insurrection act, but he’s not Immune to it.”
Pretty sure no one here has complete access to the the truth these days. If they did they wouldn't constantly try to gas light using the narrative they made up to prove the Truth of Trump and Q based on their your own feelings and is just as provable as RRN.
To not have feelings is to not be human, to let your feeling over run you intellect is chaos, to let your intellect overrun your feeling is tyranny.
Instinctual feeling are all we have where there is not enough information to cognitively figure out what is going on.
Mastering your emotions is not the same as not having emotions, try harder.
contains is not the same as is.
I have no idea which if any parts of RRN are real and which are parity, the only thing I know for certain is that you have no better idea than me.
kek
To be completely accurate, RRN does not declare itself satire, it declares itself informational and educational and entertainment.
I don't take vaxes of any kind.
But if you think you actually know where public figures are or which ones are the originals, you have not been paying attention what our media has become. I don't try to figure out where anyone is at this point, it is all just a question of which narrative is getting the most traction with the public at any given point in time. Otherwise the 'who is they?' gas lighting kicks in and the only widely accepted proof of a shared reality is the narrative your group agrees upon. I don't care if Bush or Hanks are hanging from a tree, I care about how their public persona is being used to create a narrative that impacts my everyday life.
>contains humor, parody, and satire
again, contains is not the same as is.
And I am not asking anyone to trust or believe RRN. It is just another data point in the vast sea of information.