hearing reports of people who are 'forced' to vax for their jobs filing criminal complaints with their local sheriff's office and getting some traction.
Apparently there are many criminal investigations into the jabs at county levels across the US.
Can any Anons confirm?
Seems like a good way to go. It's clearly illegal to use coercion to inject something with an unknown, untested substance.
hearing reports of people who are 'forced' to vax for their jobs filing criminal complaints with their local sheriff's office and getting some traction.
Apparently there are many criminal investigations into the jabs at county levels across the US.
Can any Anons confirm if true?
Seems like a good way to go. It's clearly illegal to use coercion to inject something with an unknown, untested substance.
>coercion
The broad definition of coercion is "the use of express or implied threats of violence or reprisal (as discharge from employment) or other intimidating behavior that puts a person in immediate fear of the consequences in order to compel that person to act against his or her will." Actual violence, threats of violence, or other acts of pressure may constitute coercion if they're used to subvert an individual's free will or consent.
In legal terms, it's often said that someone who's been coerced was acting under duress. In fact, "duress" and "coercion" are often interchanged. Black's Law Dictionary defines duress as "any unlawful threat or coercion used… to induce another to act [or to refrain from acting] in a manner [they] otherwise would not [or would]."
It's not always easy to tell when the line between subtle intimidation and coercion has been crossed and even harder to prove. A shrewd business negotiation may be considered contract coercion only if it can be proven that it was signed under duress. Similarly, proving criminal coercion (or duress) rests on the surrounding facts of the incident and may be quite subtle. For example, telling someone "Gee, I'd hate for something to happen to your daughter" is technically vague even when it's said with coercive intent.
file a criminal complaint with the local sheriffs office and inform Anons of the ongoings.
My local sheriff refused to enforce any of the mandates. I know he's based.
Maybe this was The Plan all along. Maybe we have to stand up at a local level and "teh cure will spread"
>No informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from liability for negligence.
>The broad definition of coercion is "the use of express or implied threats of violence or reprisal (as discharge from employment) or other intimidating behavior that puts a person in immediate fear of the consequences in order to compel that person to act against his or her will."
I'm not a legal scholar, but it seems clear a day that what's been going on is illegal.
>These provide a legal mechanism
Anons may have to compile evidence locally by getting witness statements from people in their areas and taking that evidence to local sheriff offices.
There is a greater chance of local sheriffs not being on the take than any federal authority.
>MIDDLEMEN
>digits mean nothing