Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 12:03 p.m. No.15374923   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4977

>>15374875

21 CFR § 50.20 - General requirements for informed consent.

 

§ 50.20 General requirements for informed consent.

Except as provided in §§ 50.23 and 50.24, no investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative. An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence. The information that is given to the subject or the representative shall be in language understandable to the subject or the representative. No informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from liability for negligence.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/50.20

 

18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions

(5)the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—

(A)involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B)appear to be intended—

(i)to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331

Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 12:13 p.m. No.15374981   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5141

>>15374951

18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions

(5)the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—

(A)involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B)appear to be intended—

(i)to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii)to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331

Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 12:19 p.m. No.15375020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5079

>>15374977

There was a video by a legal scholar posted here this week. 18 US Code 2331 Section 802 was cited along with 21 CFR 50.23 and .24. Coercion is domestic terrorism. Informed consent laws have been violated. These provide a legal mechanism to oppose enforced vaccination and prosecute those responsible. Anon took notes. We are the news now.

Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 12:30 p.m. No.15375109   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5166

>>15375068

 

Keep in mind that every crumb is not meant to be solved before the event. Some of the drops are things for anons to dig on and make connections with, others are markers for future reference.

>[future proves past]

Some drops are just simply communication to the anons.

 

What needs to be understood to appreciate whats going here is the fact the Q is basically creating a circular flow diagram that can be referenced and cross-checked with news releases. Q can’t just disclose specifics about a situation or operation without violating security protocol. Instead they drop questions and statements that lead to answers that can be understood once the subject becomes public. This provides the validation necessary for the public to believe The Great Awakening is legit. Disinformation and misdirection with Q is real. In other words Q is pointing over there but really the focus is here and only until you publicly get the news can you go back and understand. (Think SA drops) All of this is accomplished without giving up specific details about the operation. It’s quite genius.

Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 12:37 p.m. No.15375167   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15375134

It's interesting that [they] have been reduced to a 'Massive Hack' false flag and seem incapable of engineering a kinetic false flag as they've done previously. It's almost like [they] lost their special ops teams.

Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 12:50 p.m. No.15375273   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5303

>>15375166

o7. Heard and understood

 

Kein Operationsplan reicht mit einiger Sicherheit über das erste Zusammentreffen mit der feindlichen Hauptmacht hinaus. Nur der Laie glaubt in dem Verlauf eines Feldzuges die konsequente Durchführung eines im voraus gefaßten in allen Einzelheiten überlegten und bis ans Ende festgehaltenen, ursprünglichen Gedankens zu erblicken.

 

No plan of operations extends with any certainty beyond the first encounter with the main enemy forces. Only the layman believes that in the course of a campaign he sees the consistent implementation of an original thought that has been considered in advance in every detail and retained to the end.

 

Helmuth von Moltke. Danke.

Anonymous ID: 42a387 Jan. 14, 2022, 1:20 p.m. No.15375497   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15375451

Review the images of melted or deformed clocks in this bread which are consistent with Dali's 'Persistence of Memory' imagery. Someone is trying to give you a hint, Anon. It is subtle but accessible. What are they trying to tell you?