>Notables are not endorsements.
I guess you think the notables are synonymous with anon opines.
>Inb4 u must be jewherenewfag
Thought the same.
I figure It'd be kind of dumb to rush a vaccine and then turn around and disavow it's use.
It gave everyone a choice to move forward. Leave it to the mandate fuckwits to prove they don't care about your autonomy. It must make their blood fucking boil that they can't control all of us. If they can't directly control our bodies and lives, they'll continue trying what they've been doing for years and years. Editorials and hit pieces and various media angles all designed specifically to paint a narrative that they can use to control people's mind.
>actual anons
>If they don't agree with me, they must be bots or shills or newfags or some strawman that I can blame to justify my retarded thinking and overt feelings.
Why don't you worry about 'your own bullshit and let other anons think for themselves. Or do you speak for someone other than yourself?
Thanks,
>someone's dinner
Agreed.
>Quad damage confirms