𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄

Isa 43:10 𝑌𝑒 [𝑎𝑟𝑒] 𝑚𝑦 𝑤𝑖𝑡𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐿𝑂𝑅𝐷, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑦 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑤ℎ𝑜𝑚 𝐼 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛: 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒚𝒆 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐼 [𝑎𝑚] ℎ𝑒: 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑑, 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒.

God says that we may KNOW, but the church often teaches us to NOT believe! In the name of scholarship and collective wisdom gained through the ages, we are taught these contradictory ideas:

You cannot know if there is a God, you can only believe.

But we know there IS a God, because we believe.

Our knowledge is made sure by interpreting reality through that belief.

We cannot know that the Bible is the word of God.

But if we believe what it says, it tells us that it is.

And even the churches can't agree on which parts are to be believed.

And when they do believe the same parts, they argue about how to understand them.

Things happen in the world and we cannot know God's ways.

But his ways are so predictable that if we live right and pray right we can make sure we are in his perfect plan.

Evidence of his perfect plan is that life is easy for you.

But when it isn't, trust that you still are in his will, unless your sins are publicly known (then we all know you aren't).

Organizations have sprung up outside the church to give evidences that there is a God and that the Bible is his word. These are not embraced by the church, but held at arms distance; they are ridiculed by non-believers for not being scientific.

And the skeptics are correct! This is nonsense! God said we could KNOW.

If we are to KNOW that he is God; If we are to KNOW that the Bible is his word; If we are to KNOW his will; We must know it in a way that he makes it known. The church's way, as taught by the wise men of our seminaries for 2000 years, only gives the world more variety of belief and reasons for disbelief!

If we are to KNOW, then the knowledge gained from the Bible must be self-correcting. This means that there must be a way to verify and validate the meaning, from within itself.

If we are to KNOW, then the doctrine must be more knowledge than mystery.

If we are to KNOW; it must speak to the confusion of doctrine with the churches.

If we are to KNOW; it must guide into collaboration of the study of scripture rather than a debate about scripture.

And WHEN we know; it must change our lives.

In the past, when believers have cried foul at the cacophony of doctrine produced by the church, they are chided for not having faith. But the fault is not theirs. His sheep hear his voice, and the noise is not it.

This thread will examine sensus plenior and notarikon as verifiable ways of knowing God.

1 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗱…

Did that title disturb you in the least? It has been such a common phrase used in and outside of the church that we rarely give it a thought. Everyone knows that God is unknowable. We don't flinch at the thought of God being unknowable, but we flinch at the accusation we would fight over the unknowable:

“𝐼𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑦, 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑢𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 . . . 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡, 𝑠𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑤𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒, 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡.”

― E. Haldeman-Julius (a guy with a black and white photo on the internet, so it must be true.)

The accusation makes us flinch while subtly we embrace the forced idea, like a magician forcing upon us, the card he wants us to have. The intellectual sleight of hand distracts us from recognizing the same old challenge of the serpent: 𝐷𝑖𝑑 𝐺𝑜𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑠𝑎𝑦? (𝐺𝑒 3) 𝐷𝑖𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 ℎ𝑖𝑚 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡? 𝐷𝑖𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑? 𝐶𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑦.

1. God is knowable [1]

But God said:

Isa 43:10 Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

Joh 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

Ro 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

1. If you are paying close attention, you may wish to cry, "Foul!". You may observe that it appears that I am using the Bible as fact when I haven't proven it to be fact. If this were the proof section of the argument, it would be cheating, but we are still in the introduction.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀

There is a huge difference between honest questions and scoffer questions. The scoffer has already decided the matter and asks questions designed to confuse. The scoffer redefines words on the fly pretending that words have only one meaning and that he is the arbiter of that meaning.

The scoffer would ask "If we can know everything about God, doesn't that make us omniscient?". The confusion is introduced with the conditional clause beginning with "if".

We did not make the claim that we can know everything about God. The scoffer, when confronted acts hurt. "I didn't say we could, I just proposed the question, 'If we can…'". OK, then it is a stupid question. It has no relevance to the conversation. [2] If we allowed the scoffer's question to stand, those not following closely would buy the concept forced [3] upon him.

When you claim to know your neighbor, you do not claim to know everything about him, or that you could know everything about him. You claim to know him well enough to make the claim that you know him. What can be known about God is of a more sure nature than what you can know about your neighbor, since it is God himself, who makes himself known. [4]

If we are to KNOW that he is God; If we are to KNOW that the Bible is his word; If we are to KNOW his will; We must know it in a way that he makes it known.

1. Despite what your preschool teacher told you; There are stupid questions.Paul warns us against them: Tit 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.

1. As a magician forcing a card

1. Ro 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

1. 𝗦𝗶𝘅 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1Jo 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. [1]

John is not giving new revelation with this teaching. He is making a commentary on the Old Testament using the method of interpretation that Jesus taught. [2] Unlike any other language, Hebrew words derive their meaning from the combined meaning of the letters.

John is demonstrating his knowledge of the letter-metaphor in the word for 'heaven' and the word for 'earth'. [3] [4]

John is using the metaphor of each of the consonants in each word; heaven שמים and earth ארץ, as they are used in Genesis 1.

John is also demonstrating the metaphor of the number two. From Ge 1:1 it is discerned that there is only one creation, yet it has two parts; heaven and earth. This is not a moral duality which would have good and evil to be equal opposites. Nor is it a mitigated dualism where one of the gods is inferior, but always opposing. It is not a Gnostic dualism of a spirit trapped in a body. And it is not a Hindu dualism where the spiritual is a completely separate universe from the material.

–

1. We are aware that modern experts claim that the verse quoted above should not be in the Bible. Is it a fact? or is it their belief? If it is just their belief, and cannot be proven or falsified using their hermeneutics; if all they can do is banter and argue, why should we get involved? It is just a distraction. If they are not the word of God, it will be simple enough to know when we learn to read and recognize the word of God. We will not need church councils to canonize scripture for us.

1. This assertion will be demonstrated as the methods for interpreting sensus plenior are shown to be used and taught by Jesus.

1. There are 28 letter in the Hebrew alphabet, each deriving it's metaphoric meaning from the strokes within it. Everything that can be said or thought can be expressed by combining the strokes into letters and the letters into words. Considering that God spoke creation into existence, they are also the key to understanding all.

1. Yes. I know your seminary professors will tell you that there are only 22 letters in the alphabet. That's part of the reason they cannot read the OT the way Jesus and the NT authors did.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗚𝗼𝗱

The first expression of Biblical dualism is that God is Holy; he is separate, he is different.

John has declared that no man has seen God [5] Not only has he not seen him, but he cannot see him. This teaching comes from the hidden. God is to men, like water is to the fish, and air is to the bird. The fish cannot see the water; if they could, they could see nothing else. The birds cannot see the air; if they could, they could see nothing else. We are immersed in God!

Some mock the idea that God is so big that he fills the universe. God doesn't fill the universe. God is bigger than the universe! [6] When God separated heavenly stuff from earthly stuff; the stuff the universe is made of, the earthly stuff was a void within God. [7] Christians have the idea that God took absolutely nothing, and changed it's nature to be something, then organized the something into stuff.

The picture painted by Genesis is that in the beginning there was only God. He was all that there was. There was no place to put a universe, so he opened a void in himself. He then made stuff from the immaterial void. The universe is still void. He formed stuff from the holes within himself. We are immersed in him.

Ac 17:28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.

We are immersed in God like fish in water and birds in air. We cannot and never will be able to see him. He is Holy, separate, and different. He must make himself known in some way. There are three testimonies in heaven.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗱

In order to be understood, God had to take a form from the same material as the universe. That form is the exact representation of the essence of God. [8] He took on the form of the earth 'erets' ארץ. The word 'earth' not only means 'land, earth, ground, etc.' but also means 'the inhabitants of the earth'. [9]

And in that form gave three testimonies on earth.

—

1. Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].

6.1Ki 8:27 But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded?

1. Ge 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

1. Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person [hypostasis, essential nature], and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

1. Php 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻 - 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

The word 'heaven' is shamayim שמים. The three consonants ש-מ-ם each represent one of the testimonies in heaven; the Spirit (Holy Ghost), the Father, and the Word (Son). The doctrine of the Trinity was not a New Testament invention. The New Testament authors obtained the doctrine from the OT scriptures and from the metaphor of the words.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁

The first letter, the shin ש, is a symbol for the metaphor of God's word coming to earth in grace, then returning to him in holiness with an increase. As a metaphor, it can represent:

the action of the word returning to God with an increase [1]

the joining of the word and the increase [2]

the Spirit which joins or gives life [3] [4]

Since fire is a symbol of the Holy Ghost, some see the shin as flames.

The symbol of the shin being the Holy Spirit is also confirmed by the language itself. Since words are made by combining the symbols and metaphors of the letter, the meaning of a word is derived from the letters. God said he created the heavens… and then the Spirit hovered over the face of the waters. Where did the waters come from?

The word for waters (dual form, two waters) is 'mayim' מים. And the word for heaven is 'waters with the Spirit on the face' 'shamayim' שמים . The waters were a part of the heavens. The dual form of water mayim' מים has two waters within it. 'Mi' מו is the water above (see the two halves are connected on top), and 'im' ים, the waters below.

The plan of God, from the beginning, included the covenant with man where the Father and Son would be separated. The Spirit joined them (hovering over the face of the waters). The first separation was the incarnation and the Holy Spirit joined Father and Son at his baptism. [5] The second separation was upon the cross. [6]

—

1. Isa 55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it.

1. Joh 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, [there] ye may be also.

1. Joh 14:16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;

1. Joh 16:7 ¶ Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

1. Mt 3:16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:

1. Mr 15:34 And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻 - 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝗼𝗻

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

The word 'heaven' is shamayim שמים. The three consonants ש-מ-ם each represent one of the testimonies in heaven; the Spirit (Holy Ghost), the Father, and the Word (Son).

The word for waters (dual form, two waters) is 'mayim' מים. And the word for heaven is 'waters with the Spirit on the face' 'shamayim' שמים

The reason for going into the details of the Hebrew language is to demonstrate that the New Testament authors were not inventing new doctrine when they spoke of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. They were interpreting the hidden layer [1] of scripture which was revealed by Jesus.

The Father and Son

The waters above מי represent the plan or covenant of the Father, and the waters below ים represent the covenant being fulfilled by the Son on earth. [2]

Though the two mems מ and ם have different forms, they have the same sound. They are one letter, just as the Father and Son are one. [3] The thing that separates the mems is a yod, representing creation. The creation is what came between the Father and the Son. The Son died for it. [4]

Both forms of the mem; מ and ם, are drawn by combining the kaf כ , representing the Son of God, and the zayin ז, representing the bride. In the normal form מ they are touching at the top to symbolize the covenant or promise of the Father. [5]

By the filling of the Spirit, men are made to be the bride and one flesh with the Son of God. They were chosen by the Father, in the way that Abraham, as the Father, chose a bride for Isaac. This doctrine is also taught by the first word of Genesis 1:1 bereshit בראשית.

The word means 'in the beginning'. However, it is also a riddle in word play: bᵉriyth ברית means 'covenant' and in the beginning (in bereshit) is a covenant bᵉriyth with man 'esh' אש in the center. [6]

The Word

The Son of God is also the Word of God. In the beginning, בראשית the son 'bar' בר spoke and created the heavens and the earth א. The word for created is 'bara' ברא. As a metaphor it can speak of the act of creation, the object of creation, or the one creating. Since God 'spoke' to create, it can be said that bara is also the Word which created.

When John read bereshit, he deduced that in the beginning, in bereshit בראשית , was the Word; the bara ברא. Hebrew is written right to left. See that the three letters in bara, are the same three letters that start bereshit.

The Father declared his purpose, the Son spoke it into existence and was more than the speaker, but the effective Word of God. The Spirit fluttered over the face of the Father and Son, like their shared breath. All three are self existent in Gen 1.

—

1. The hidden layer will become important when we speak of knowing God, the Bible and his will.

1. Ge 1:6 ¶ And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. Ge 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which [were] under the firmament from the waters which [were] above the firmament: and it was so.

1. Joh 10:30 I and [my] Father are one.

1. Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

1. Lu 24:49 And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.

1. The seminaries will tell you that איש is man. It is the word for man derived from the 'gate' or 2-letter sub-root אש meaning 'separated to be the increase' and is expressed by the fire of the Holy Ghost which purifies, and also by 'man' who is the bride. Bereshit could also be stated "in the beginning there was a covenant with fire (purification) in the heart.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿

Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].

God is to us, like the water is to the fish and the air is to the birds. Fish and birds cannot see the water and the air. We have not, and cannot see God because he permeates all. [1] [2]

Though we cannot see him, he has testified to us in such a way that no man can deny it.[3]

Several years ago I got some baby goats. They are my goats. If they are on a hillside they will come to my voice. If they are mixed in with other goats, they will come to my voice or whistle. If we are on a trail together (they have crossbuck saddles and carry my gear) they may wish to go back to the parking lot. They may start back to the parking lot. But if I stand and whistle or call, they come back to me.

How do those goats know they are mine? They are bonded to me. When I first got them, I let them out of the back of the minivan and realized I was going to be chasing them all over the neighborhood. They were scared, didn't know me or the area. So I got down on all fours and started eating grass. Their instincts kicked in and they saw that there was nothing to fear if that other animal was calmly eating. So they joined me.

I sat with them that night in the dark among all the spooky sounds, and I whispered to them. As you were being formed in the womb, God whispered to you. You came to know his voice. You became his sheep. He says that his sheep hear his voice. [4] Hearing is a metaphor for being drawn to a call, but not understanding the words. If you are drawn to God… if you hear his voice, you are his sheep.

You can try to deny it. You can hide in the bushes or down the face of a cliff. You might even try to find your way to hell to avoid it. But you are his sheep.

Cue the religious zealots: But what about confessing, walking the aisle, baptism, works, ceremonies?

If you hear his voice, you are his sheep. Period. You belong to him. You may wander. [5] You may rebel. [6] You may be a fool. [7] You may be tossed about by the storms. [8] But you belong to him; you are his sheep. [9] The fact that you are drawn to God sufficiently to read my boring text, is evidence enough that you hear his voice. You belong to him.

The Father has testified to you by whispering in your ear while you were being formed. You sensed not only the heartbeat of your mother, but the still, small voice of God, who comforted you in the darkness. His spirit spoke to your spirit. He made you his.

—

1. Ps 139:7 ¶ Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? Ps 139:8 If I ascend up into heaven, thou [art] there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou [art there]. Ps 139:9 [If] I take the wings of the morning, [and] dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; Ps 139:10 Even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me.

1. Jer 23:23 [Am] I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off? Jer 23:24 Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD.

1. Ro 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

1. Joh 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

1. Ps 107:4 They wandered in the wilderness in a solitary way; they found no city to dwell in.

1. Ps 107:11 Because they rebelled against the words of God, and contemned the counsel of the most High:

1. Ps 107:17 ¶ Fools because of their transgression, and because of their iniquities, are afflicted.

1. Ps 107:26 They mount up to the heaven, they go down again to the depths: their soul is melted because of trouble.

1. Ps 107:41 Yet setteth he the poor on high from affliction, and maketh [him] families like a flock.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗻

Isa 43:10 Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I [am] he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

The Hebrew word for 'believe' aman אמן means to trust. It is not merely an intellectual agreement to a propositional statement. It also means 'turn to the right'.

1. 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗽

The theologians would have us believe that we are sheep, and those people over there, who don't look or act like us are goats destined to slaughter. This is completely inconsistent with the God of the Bible. God tells us that he is the one who decides what is good and evil. He tells us not to judge others. He would not tell us that WE are sheep and THEY are goats, since it would tempt us to judge others.

We are both a goat and a sheep. Our flesh is the goat. The flesh would make us to be a god. The flesh protects, feeds and pleasures itself. It is our instinctive nature. The flesh is at war with God. [1] The flesh is not subject to the law. It is unthinking instinct. You cannot appeal to it since it has no rationality. You can only train the flesh.

You are a goat on the left side, and a sheep on the right side. [2] We are not speaking of your literal left and right sides, but left is a symbol of the flesh, and right is a symbol of the spirit.

'Believe' or 'trust' אמן 'aman' means to turn from the goat to the sheep; 'turn to the right' אמן 'aman'. [3]

—

1. Ro 8:7 Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

1. Mt 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

1. Yes. The Hebrew word for 'believe' also means 'turn to the right'.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝘂𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿

Joh 5:19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.

The Son's sole purpose is to make the unseen Father known to his creation. He does this through teaching. Teaching is an appeal to the spirit. Theologians are aware of the teachings of the Son through the red letters of their Bibles. But they are largely ignorant of the teaching of the Son through the mystery which was hidden from the beginning. This is why they cannot read the scriptures the way Jesus and the apostles did.

The Son of God watches the Father work invisibly behind the scenes in the history of Israel, and he guides the writing of that record, such that the mystery is hidden within. The teaching he did in the temple when he was twelve years old, and later during his ministry, draw from and reveal that mystery. He has no new teaching. He only does what he sees the Father doing. The teaching, which we call the new teaching, has been hidden in the history, poetry and prophecy from the beginning. It is so tightly coupled with the words and strokes of the letters that it's meaning can be known surely. It is reproducible and verifiable. Even if you cannot exegete [4] it yourself, you can verify that it is true.

When we can finally see the mystery, we see that no man could have invented it. It is woven in the history by the Father, and recorded for teaching by the Son. There is no free-for-all allegory, though the lazy will say it is. It is not the allegorical teaching of Origen. It is not the wild Midrash of the rabbis. It is not the ethereal wishful nonsense of the mystics. It is firmly grounded what the Son inspired to write, using the words of a language the Son gave, formed and given meaning by the letters of the alphabet, which themselves were formed from the strokes of his name.

That was a mouthful. So I'll say it in smaller parts.

There are two strokes which form all the letters of the Hebrew alphabet. The yod י is the first. The vav ו is formed by extending the yod. The yod represents (in metaphor) God's first thought of creation, or the void within him self that he formed in order to have a place for the universe. The second is his voice projected into the void to form all that there is from nothing. These two letters form the unpronounceable name of God יוי. It is unpronounceable because they form the first letter of the alphabet, the aleph א, which is a silent letter. If we tried to pronounce it, it would sound similar to Yahweh. But it cannot be said, since it is a silent letter. Yahweh is the name that can be said, and which Moses was commanded to use.

The letters, are all formed from these two letters which are strokes. the letters get their meaning from the strokes. The letters then combine their metaphors as they form words to give meaning to the words. None of this can be understood, without an understanding of the cross.

The language was formed with a knowledge of the cross, the history was formed with a knowledge of the cross, the OT scriptures were written with a knowledge of the cross, before any man knew anything about the cross.

This is the testimony of the Son. You can trust the Father, because there is incontrovertible proof, hidden in the mystery, that he alone is God and has been intimately involved in the history of man from the beginning.

All of creation was spoken into existence with words made from the meaning of the letters, made from the meaning of his name. The word for 'name' in English as well as Hebrew also means 'reputation'. Creation and all that is in it, is the reputation of God, that he alone is God, and he is the creator; He is holy. [5]

1. 𝗧𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁

The word 'believe' means 'trust' and 'turn to the right'. Stop feeding the goat and feed the sheep (on the right) more. The goat only trusts himself and looks after himself. The sheep trusts the shepherd. Because the sheep trusts the shepherd, he can also put others ahead of himself.

You don't have to fight over food like children. Even if there is not enough for all, you can let others have it because you trust the shepherd to feed you. This is an act of the will, not of instinct. Trust is a choice, not a feeling.

—

1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exegesis

5.Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁

Isa 43:10 Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe [trust] me, and understand that I [am] he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

1. 𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱

The word used here for 'understand' is tabuwn תבון. biyn בון means 'understand'. The tov ת added as a prefix, is the last letter of the natural alphabet, and gives tabuwn the sense of the ultimate understanding. We might call it the authoritative understanding. God wants us to understand him the way that Jesus and the apostles did. When you speak on the doctrine of the Bible, having learned to read it like Jesus and the apostles, you will speak with authority, unlike the theologians who endlessly quote each other.

In order to understand, you must correlate scripture with scripture. This is the only way that scripture can interpret itself. You are not alone in that endeavor. The Spirit is given to you to remind you of the things you have been taught and learned. [1]

The Spirit did not give Jesus and the apostles knowledge. He reminded them of the knowledge they had, in order to correlate scripture. You can know when it is the Spirit who does this for you by the whispered revelation.

1. 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

Mt 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Mt 16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed [it] unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

Peter had received a revelation from God, and didn't know it until Jesus told him. Peter knew the scriptures, and had seen what Jesus was doing. On his own he did not know how to connect the dots. The theologians of the day couldn't connect the dots. But the Spirit of God stuck his finger in Peter's ear and stirred up the memories so they correlated with each other. When the dots were connected, Peter had a revelatory knowledge of who Jesus was.

When you start to study the Bible the way Jesus and the apostles did, you will see hints of things and know there is more. You will ask God for his wisdom [2], and he will help you correlate it. You will know that it is him because it will always declare that Jesus is the Christ, the son of the living God [3]. No man will have shown you, but you will understand the mystery hidden from the beginning.

You will understand, because the Spirit will tie scripture together for you. You must put scripture in your head by studying. The Spirit will make it make sense.

—

1. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1. Jas 1:5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all [men] liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.

1. Joh 15:26 ¶ But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1Jo 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

The three on earth were:

The Father spoke to you in the womb so that you would recognize his voice. He has testified to everyone. [1]

The Son has pointed to the Father trough all his words, works, life, death, resurrection and indwelling Spirit. [2]

The Spirit has testified to you by correlating what you have learned to make it understandable. [3]

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗱

In order to be understood, God had to take a form from the same material as the universe. That form is the exact representation of the essence of God. [4] He took on the form of the earth 'erets' ארץ. The word 'earth' not only means 'land, earth, ground, etc.' but also means 'the inhabitants of the earth'. [5]

And in that form gave three testimonies on earth. Since Jesus is the fullness of the godhead [6], He gives three testimonies of God in his flesh.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 א

The silent letter aleph א is the unpronounceable name of God. [7]. But it's primary metaphor is that of holiness or separation. When God spoke [the diagonal vav] and created the heavens and the earth [the two yods] he created by separating from his creation. He is Holy… "Let there be light" (the symbol for holiness).

The same aleph represents the Spirit hovering over the face of the waters. [8] It represents the firmament between the waters. [9] It represents the war between heaven and earth. [10]

John is using it in the verse above as the Spirit hovering on the face of the waters. This was fulfilled in the flesh at Jesus's baptism when the Spirit descended between the word (water) above, and the water below. [11]

—

1. Ro 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

1. The testimony of the Son

1. The testimony of the Spirit

1. Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person [hypostasis, essential nature], and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

1. Php 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

1. Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

1. The_testimony_of_the_Son#The_Son_makes_us_trust_the_Father

1. Ge 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

1. Ge 1:6 ¶ And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

1. Ro 8:7 Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

1. Mt 3:16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱 ץ

The final tsadi ץ represents holiness and grace being reconciled through death. It is a picture of the cross. The cross is the place where Jesus shed his blood for us. [14]

1. 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿, 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁

When there are three things we look for a metaphoric association with the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. The Spirit is associated with the Spirit, and the Son with the cross. The water is represents the Son, but we remember that the Son always testifies of the Father. So the revelation is the testimony of the Father. [15]

—

1. Joh 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

1. Joh 4:10 Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

1. Lu 22:20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup [is] the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

1. Joh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou [then], Shew us the Father?

>>15380943 oops

1. a 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ר

The letter resh ר represents the things that can be known about heavenly things coming to earth. The rounded corner means that it includes the personality of God, not just his teaching. I often refer to it as revelation as a technical term differing from a command or teaching.

The water above, may מי, is the Father with his plan for creation. The water below, im ים, is the creation finished by the Son. The metaphor of water includes the speaking of the word of God as the Father declares his will, the accomplished work of the Son, as well as the person of the Son as the one who is the one who makes it happen. In a lessor metaphor, the church is the water also since now it accomplished God's will through teaching and preaching. The water and the word are equivalent metaphors.

Jesus is both the Word of God [12] and the Living water. [13]

—

1. Joh 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

1. Joh 4:10 Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘆

Isa 43:10 Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

1. 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗵? 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁.

Now the skeptic chimes in:

You said God spoke to me, but I don't hear his voice.

You said that the Son testified, but I don't get it.

You said the Holy Spirit makes it make sense, but it's still gibberish.

And you say that Jesus testified in the flesh, but I wasn't there.

So how am I supposed to know?

Typically the answer is: You just have to believe, then you will know. I don't buy that answer either! Sometimes the answer is: Look at all the miracles! But the miracles were not intended to persuade non-believers. Not even Jesus's teaching was intended to do that. [1]

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝘇𝘇𝗹𝗲

Imagine a crossword puzzle. There are clues for horizontal and vertical words that cross on shared letters. Got it? Now imagine that you could swap the letters consistently; replace every A with a W and ever B with a D, etc. Then by rearranging the clues, the puzzle still worked. Creating that puzzle might be difficult enough. But the one designing the substitution has to be different than the one who created the puzzle, and the clues all stay the same, just shuffled. That would seem pretty impossible even for a small puzzle. You would quickly claim that the one who made the puzzle must have designed it to be possible to be shuffled.

Now imagine that the words are not words, but sentences, and the letters are words. The same rules apply. But now there are over 23,000 sentences in play, and it must work for every single one. The clues remain the same and can only be shuffled. Oh yeah, and none of the clues make any sense until 400-4000 years later than when they were written, and they were written by more than 30 authors who didn't speak to each other or know anything about the subject matter.

Yeah, this is a bit confusing because it is outside of our experience. Suppose there was a book that told story A. And every sentence had double meanings that also told the story A..

If you were to observe that the claims were true, there could be no doubt that the puzzle or book was not created by the intention or accident of men.

1. 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲

As you study in order to validate the claims… no you won't believe this, but it's true… you will start to hear the Spirit whisper answers to the riddles the same way he did for Peter. He will always testify that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. [2]

This should not be a surprise! God wants you to know! And he will use every testimony he has given to man to make you know him. He seeks out every last lost sheep. [3]

—

1. Mt 13:15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and [their] ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with [their] eyes, and hear with [their] ears, and should understand with [their] heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

1. Mt 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

1. Lu 15:4 What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?

1. 𝗔𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮𝗯𝗲𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘀

Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

If you wish to solve the riddle of the alphabet, you may approach it from two sides: from the strokes, or from the words.

1. 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝘀

The metaphoric meaning of a letter… wait! wait! Letters don't have meaning!

Now you are starting to understand. Hebrew is the only known language that behaves this way. The letters have meaning. But because Hebrew was a dead language for so long, only to be revived when the Jewish people started gathering in the first half of the nineteenth century [1], the meaning of the letters was lost. Only a memory that they had a meaning remained.

During the same time, the preserved sacred text (square letters) was transformed from sacred usage to common. Educational programs were started to teach the Jewish people their own language.

This is important because there is no authority for the meaning of the sacred alphabet letters. There is only a memory that they have meaning. The authority for the meaning will come from observations within scripture itself.

The letters derive their meaning from the strokes of the letters. There are two primary strokes which form all the other letters, and the second one is formed from the first. Every letter is formed by first drawing a yod. Every letter has a yod in it.

These are the yod י and the vav ו.

אבגדהןזחטיכלמנסעפצקרשתךםןףץ

The yod is conceptually an infinitesimally small dot. That is difficult to draw and even harder to see, so the yod is used to represent it. To the Greeks it is the iota. In English we call it a jot. Jesus said that the tiniest part of the law would not disappear before it was all fulfilled.[2]

Rethink that saying. "Not the tiniest part of the law…" We think in terms of the requirements of the law. We think he said that not one of the smallest requirements would disappear. But he did not say that. He said that not one yod, from any letter of any word of any sentence in the law would disappear.

There are four things to observe from this:

1. His word will be miraculously preserved

2. Every yod must have meaning, why else would they need preserved?

3. All things proceed from the mind of God.

4. Each letter must have meaning if the yod starts by giving it meaning.

The vav is referred to as the tittle in Greek. It means horn, and in Hebrew is qeren קרן . Reading by the letters [3] it means 'redemption revealed through the death of the son of man'. This is the horn.

When Jesus said that not one tittle (horn) would pass away there are these observations:

1. His word will be miraculously preserved.

2. Every vav must have meaning, why else would they be preserved?

3. All things are upheld the Word of God. [4]

4. All things concerning redemption are revealed in the death of Christ. [5]

5. The proclamation of redemption through the cross will not be impeded. [6]

You may start with the strokes and try to make the metaphor of the letters from them, such that the meaning of the letters combine to form words. This is the hard way, though it is useful for validating the meaning when they are discovered other ways.

—

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revival_of_the_Hebrew_language

1. Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

1. We will see how to do this later.

1. Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

1. The pictures of the cross in the OT are the 'keys to the kingdom'.

1. Mt 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

1. 𝗬𝗼𝗱 י

The first stroke is conceptually an infinitesimally small dot. That is difficult to draw and even harder to see, so the yod is used to represent it. It is the same as the tenth letter of the alphabet (the number 10 represents the dual-natured man - Christ). To the Greeks it is the iota. In English we call it a jot. Jesus said that the tiniest part of the law would not disappear before it was all fulfilled.[1]

As a metaphor, the yod represents: the first idea that God had to create, the first void in himself that he made in which to put his creation, the creation itself, the creator, or if two yods are used, as two parts of the whole. As a prefix, it is pronounced yah and is one of the names of God.

The meaning of the name of the letter yod יד is hand. Just as the metaphor of the letter yod can represent the works of God (all of his creation), so the meaning of the name hand also represents the works of God.

The formation of every letter starts by drawing a yod. We say that everything God intended to create, comes from the yod, since it forms the letters which form the words of creation.

The ideas here are still held by rabbis, even though they cannot solve the puzzle. Cabalists[2] will assign meaning to the letters, but their meanings very quickly prove to be unreliable.

Christ is the alpha and omega; the beginning and the end

"My hands/works" is the Hebrew word idi ידי where God is the beginning and end of my works. [3]

"He is becoming" is the word ihi יהי where God started the good work in him and will complete it. [4]

"My days" is the Hebrew word imi ימי where God, represented by the yod, is the beginning and the end of days.

"Possession' is Yishay ישי where God, represented by the yod, is the beginning and the end of possession. [5]

"He shall live" is Yichi יחי where God, represented by the yod, is the beginning and the end of his life. [6]

"Beauty" is yophiy יפי where God, represented by the yod, is the beginning and the end of beauty. [7] [8]

—

1. Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

1. Much of what the Cabalists do is an intentional distraction so that their children and you will not see Christ in the scriptures.

1. Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

1. Php 1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform [it] until the day of Jesus Christ:

1. Job 1:21 And said, Naked came I out of my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.

1. 1Sa 2:6 The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.

1. Isa 61:3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the LORD, that he might be glorified.

1. Isa 3:18 In that day the Lord will take away the [beauty] of [their] tinkling ornaments [about their feet], and [their] cauls, and [their] round tires like the moon,

1. 𝗩𝗮𝘃 ו

As the horn [1], the vav ו is a declaration or an announcement.

The doctrine from the stroke or letter vav ו is that God spoke and clarified or explained things by separating two side of the same thing. If the yod י is the void that God created within himself to have a place for the universe, then the vav ו is the first words spoken into the void; the first declaration; the first blowing of the horn; "Let there be light". [2]

Light is a symbol of God's holiness. It is an expression of being separate… being different.

Where was the light before creation? Was God NOT holy before then? In Ge 1:3 he declared himself to be holy to his creation. Prior to creation there was no one to be separate or different from. Though all his attributes were present, attributes of comparison could not be expressed.

We can see a hint of his holiness hidden in his name. His name is Elohim 'elohiym' אלהים but the is a pun 'alo-chuwm' אלחום meaning 'not dark'. He is the light!

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱

The vav ו looks like a sword, and it represents the word as the two-edged sword. [3]

We can think of the yod י as a generic noun and the vav ו as a generic verb. Since the vav starts with a yod, the action has an actor. God is the first mover.

All the other letter are formed with yods and vavs, and their meaning derive from them.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝗶𝗹

The name of the vav is spelled וו and has the meaning 'hook' or 'nail'. From this we discern the doctrine that it was his own word; his own declaration that nailed him to the cross. [4]

Since the name 'vav' has two vavs in it, he declared his intention in heaven and in earth. [5]

—

1. Alphabet cheats

1. Ge 1:3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

1. Heb 4:12 For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

1. Joh 10:18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

1. Eph 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

1. 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 𝗚𝗼𝗱'𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘆

Systematic theology is a discussion of Biblical topics and includes many topics. [1] The problem with systematic theology is that some man selects the topics to discuss and collects the scriptures concerning those topics in order to support his theological position. Since many of the presuppositions come from Greek philosophy, that philosophy is imposed upon the interpretation of scripture. To observe this, one need only to read a systematic theology from each of the divergent branches of the church.

1. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪

If we will know what God intends to make known we must start with what he says. The letters of the Hebrew alphabet create the meaning of the words in scripture. The words create the meaning that God intended. Each letter is a metaphor whose meaning is a topic for God's systematic theology. As we observe the explosion of the letter meaning into word meanings and then into theology, it will be apparent that knowledge of the cross is required to discern it.

The cross is the key to interpreting God's intended meaning in the letters, words and doctrine. Formal proofs of the meanings become tedious to read, and as stated before; their consistent use will be sufficient proof that human invention is impossible.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗚𝗼𝗱'𝘀 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆

Hebrew does not have unique symbols for numbers. The alphabet letters are used for numbers. Reading the meaning of the letters in numerical order produces God's outline for his systematic theology.

Read the alphabet as a message from God:

God spoke and created the heavens and the earth - א

He revealed to man - ב

He pursued them - ג

With the Word - ד

Which they did not understand - ה

It distinguished them - ו

As the bride - ז

When they did understand - ח

Through a marriage - ט

A new creation - י

The Son of God - כ

Taught - ל

The promise of the Father - מ

The Son of Man - נ

Fulfilled the promise - ס

In his flesh - ע

He spoke in parables and riddles - פ

Of the cross - צ

The Son of God redeemed man - ק

Revealing - ר

His word doesn't return void - ש

He completed his work - ת

The Son of God died - ך

Finished the earthly work of the Father - ם

The Son of Man restored to glory- ן

All prophecy was fulfilled - ף

Judgement was ended - ץ

Co-heirs with Christ -

—

1. Christian systematic theology will often touch on some or all of the following topics: God, trinitarianism, revelation, creation and divine providence, theodicy, theological anthropology, Christology, soteriology, ecclesiology, eschatology, Israelology, Bibliology, hermeneutics, sacrament, pneumatology, Christian life, Heaven, and interfaith statements on other religions. [1]

1. 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 - א

Creation א

God created by separating. Even the word 'create' bara ברא means 'separate'. As the diagonal stroke of the aleph is drawn it separates top from bottom and right from left. The two yods represent two aspects of creation;heaven and earth, and grace and holiness.

The word 'heaven' contains metaphor for the Father, Son and Spirit. The Holy trinity was separated from the earth when the heavens were separated from the earth.

The separation of heaven and earth signifies God's holiness. The separation of holiness and grace divides his revelation of himself into two parts. We are incapable of understanding holiness and grace together on our own.

If a criminal goes free, we don't cheer the wonderful grace, but cry that there is no justice. If we are the criminal and don't get to go free, we do not praise the wonderful justice. We whine that there is no mercy. When we mix law and grace, or holiness and love, we mess it up.

But God is both. He is a just God and a merciful God. To reveal that to us, his law is revealed to show us his justice, and the cross is revealed to satisfy that justice while giving us mercy.

Hint: As you run across all the laws against mixing things; seeds, garments, etc. They are all teaching aids for this concept: only Christ can reveal the Father by reconciling Holiness and Love.

1. 𝗛𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗻 - ב

The bet ב is formed by drawing a resh ר and finishing it with a lower horizontal vav ו.

ב ר

The resh ר is a revelation, the bet ב a revelation to man.

God shows himself

The Father is to us, like the water is to fish and the air to birds. We are completely immersed in him. This is why we cannot see him any more than the fish can see the water or the birds can see the air.

We cannot search him out. We can only know of him what he chooses to make known. God becoming a man, would be like the water becoming a fish to speak to fish, and like the air becoming a bird to speak to a bird. However, the fish CAN see the rocks and the seaweed and other things.

All of creation was made to communicate some things about God to us. We can see the rocks and the seaweed too. [1]

In order to be able to know that there is a God by interpreting the evidence of creation, you were created with the mechanism for doing so. We might speculate what that mechanism is, but it is more important to observe what other abilities we were created with. Consider the atheist, he is a natural born scientist:

As an infant he had the ability to gather observations through various senses. He can correlate patterns in those observations. He can identify rewards and penalties, and theorize about the correlation of his own actions with those rewards and penalties. He can experiment and adjust his behavior to maximize rewards. He does all of this without thinking about why he does it.

He has a natural instinct that the universe is rational, and that he may depend upon it when making adjustments to his theories and hypotheses. He operates on the theory that he may know truth.

By the time he is grown he gives up his science: he has chosen to believe, against all the evidence of his life, that there is no truth, and he knows nothing, all the while proclaiming the 'truth' that there is no God.

The one who declares that there is no truth relies upon the existence of truth to declare there is no God. This instinctive reliance on truth betrays the ardent atheist as a fraud.

God has revealed himself to all men by giving him an instinctive dependency upon truth. By this we may know him. [2]

1. Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

1. Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

1. 𝗛𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝘀𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 - ג

The gimel ג is such a fun letter. Jesus used it in a saying concerning the rich man. But it has a deep theological meaning as well.

The gimel ג is drawn as a vav ו which splits. Jewish children learn that it is a rich man pursuing a poor man, because it looks like an outstretched leg.

The vav ן is the Word of God (Jesus [1]) with the focus being on clarifying by separating, but in the case of the gimel, doesn't just explain or clarify things, but also teaches holiness. The teaching of holiness (separation) is how God pursues us. Though we experience grace, we need to understand holiness to understand the grace.

1. 𝗪𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲

When God created the heavens and the earth, his creation was bathed in grace. [2] But we do not understand grace without understanding holiness, so he immediately revealed himself as holy. [3]

Lets put this in different terms. Holiness is expressed by separation. God created us by separating a void from himself. He made space for us within him. He is God, we are not. We are in God. We customarily say that God is everywhere as if the everywhere were a container for God. But there is no container larger than God. [4] God is not in everything. Everything is in God. [5]

1. 𝗪𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝘄

If I told you that I paid your fine, you would think I was crazy, because you are unaware of any fine. My statement to you would be foolishness. This is the same with the preaching of the cross. [6]

If you are unaware of the war between you and God; if you are oblivious to sin; if you do not know the pain, suffering and death that you contribute to; you perceive no need for assistance.

Perhaps you remember the first time you realized that you unintentionally hurt someone deeply; the look that pierced your heart and birthed human empathy within you. You immediately understood your need for grace. It is likely you had cause harm previously, but unaware sensed no need for assistance.

This is the purpose of the law. This is the mission of the judge. The law and the judge do not simply condemn you. They condemn you for the purpose of piercing your hardened heart so that you realize the pain, suffering and death you have contributed to. They condemn you so that you will seek assistance, forgiveness and mercy. They condemn you to lead you to Christ and the cross.

—

1. Joh 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

1. Ge 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

1. Ge 1:4 And God saw the light, that [it was] good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

1. 1Ki 8:27 But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded?

1. Ac 17:28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.

1. 1Co 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗺𝗮𝗻 (𝗚𝗼𝗱) 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝘀𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗻 (𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗿)

Jesus uses this meaning in a brilliant riddle which reverses the historical event with the hidden meaning.

Consider the dialog and circumstances around the meeting of the rich man and Jesus. [7]]

The rich man came running to the poor man Jesus and asks what he must do to have eternal life, but he refers to Jesus as the 'good' teacher.

This is a trigger word for Jesus. Original and universal sin is when men determine for themselves, or define, good and evil, usurping God prerogative. Only God can declare what is good or evil.

Jesus gently confronts the man, explaining that only God is good. The motive may be two-fold: "Why do you make a judgement that I am good since only God can judge?", or "Has God told you that I am God, and therefore I am good?"

Jesus attempts to determine which it is by telling him to keep the law. The man has two answers to choose from: "I have kept the law", or "I cannot keep the law and need mercy".

The man contradicts Jesus saying that only God is good. He doubles down that he himself is good, with the implication that he is equal to God.

If he is equal to God, then Jesus says he should do what God has done: Jesus, the eternal Son of God left his high estate, giving up everything to be man in order to reveal the father through teaching, and through his death. He invites, "Come follow me", after you also give up all you possess.

The rich man (Jesus - incarnate God) has chased the poor man (the sinner) with the law and judgement.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗹

Jesus highlights the meaning of the encounter using the gimal: The name of the letter gimel ג also means 'camel'. They are the same word. Now consider the eye of the needle. When you thread a needle, you wet the thread and twist it to make it stiff. Then you hold it up close to your eye and bring the needle to the thread. You do this because if you move the thread, it will shake and fall and you will have to wet and twist it again. You bring the needle to the thread.

How is it that the rich man could think he was sinless? If we approach the law, like the thread approaching the needle we wilt before it. In order to think we are sinless, we must hold ourselves still, and draw the law to us so that we fit in the center of it. We re-interpret the law, or redefine it so that we are not guilty of sin.

We say that we are not guilty of murder, though Jesus says we are if we have been angry with a brother. We didn't steal that stuff from the office, we borrowed it and just haven't returned it yet. We don't lust, we just enjoy beauty. We don't covet, we just want to improve our lot in life.

It is easier for the real camel to go through the eye of a real needle, than is is for the rich man sinner, who chased the poor man, to justify himself by the law. It will never happen.

Those pangs of guilt; the times when a memory literally makes you gnash your teeth, or flinch; are the fruit of the law piercing your heart so that you will understand the need for mercy and be drawn to God for it. God pursues you.

1. Mk 10:17, Mt 19:16, Lk 18:18

1. 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗱 - ד

The dalet ד represents a spoken word, or the result of a spoken word.

God spoke… God said… ten times in Genesis 1.

1. He declared himself to be holy [1]

2. He reconciled holiness (the waters above) with Love (the waters below). [2]

3. He became desolate in the incarnation to show the great lengths he would go to reconcile men to himself. [3]

4. He withered, he taught and he died among us so that he would bear fruit. [4]

5. He and his fruit became a testimony of holiness. [5]

6. His word brought forth life.[6]

7. Even the desolate came to life. [7]

8. He took a bride for himself. [8]

9. He was fruitful with his bride. [9]

10. He and his bride were co-heirs of the kingdom.[10]

Yeah.. I know. If you read that quickly you are totally lost. Each time God said, he revealed something about himself and his plan. But he revealed it in the mystery of creation. All of creation testifies of God. [11]

Each thing that God spoke of, remained a mystery until the cross. Only then can we look back and see that his plan was planned from the beginning. He had it all under control. We will come back to Genesis 1 and show how he revealed himself in the hidden account of creation. All the symbols used will be used the same way throughout scripture.

—

Ge 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

Ge 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

Ge 1:9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

Ge 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

Ge 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

Ge 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

Ge 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

Ge 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Ge 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Ge 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

1. 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 - ה

The center letter of Elohim (translated 'God') is the hei ה. It has a positive and negative connotation. It represents hearing, but not understanding. It is formed with a dalet ד which is a spoken word of God with a yod י returning to heaven, but not quite making it. It represents the kind of hearing the sheep have when they hear the shepherd's voice. [1]

Have you been drawn to God, like a voice in the distance calling? You ARE a sheep. Only his sheep hear his voice. The sheep don't understand the words, but they know they belong to God; the voice is familiar.

Elohim means 'God separated from his people because they don't understand' or 'God connected to his people because they hear him call.' The sheep may be separated from him, but they belong to him.

1. 𝗗𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗻 𝗯𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴

God spoke creation into existence and it is the result of his word. It declares the invisible nature of God. [2]

But men do not understand his declaration. Instead they build religions around nature as if the creation was God. [3]

The sense of awe we get from creation is proper if it draws us to his call. Some mistakenly believe that this personal revelation of God is sufficient. If that were so he would not have his people teach. [4]

1. 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱

When Israel left Egypt and reached Mt. Sanai, God spoke directly to the whole nation to give them the law. Yes. Really. I know you thought that he spoke only to Moses because you saw it in a cartoon or movie. But he spoke to all the people. [5] When the people heard the voice of God, they did not understand. It was just thunderings to them. [6] They were afraid to hear his words. [7]

1. 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗱, 𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝘀

Jesus spoke in parables so that the crowds would not understand. [8] If they could be saved by his teaching alone, it would make the cross vain. Jesus had to die alone, desolate and unfruitful, just as the seed is planted in the ground. [9]

—

1. Joh 10:3 To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.

1. Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

1. Ro 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

1. Mt 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

1. Ex 19:25 So Moses went down unto the people, and spake unto them. Ex 20:1 ¶ And God spake all these words, saying,

1. Ex 20:18 ¶ And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw [it], they removed, and stood afar off.

1. Ex 20:19 And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die.

1. Lu 8:10 And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.

1. Joh 12:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.

1. 𝗜𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 - ו

Heb 4:12 For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

The vav ו looks like a sword and represents the word of God which is like a sword. The word clarifies, or explains things by slicing them apart and outing them back together. As a prefix, the vav is translated 'and'. 'And' joins two things, but divides them by acknowledging that they are different.

1. God separated creation from himself

'Bereshith bara' בראשית ברא : In the beginning created. These are the first words of Genesis 1:1. The word for 'create' ברא also means 'separate'. God is completely different from us in the very stuff that makes God God and us us. He is not merely a more progressed man. He is not merely a more progressed spirit. He and we are not on the same path. He is the path and the way. [1]

1. 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻ו

God created a special kind of life, different from all the other life on earth. You are not JUST an animal. We share the flesh of animals. We share the instincts of animals. But we have the breath of God. [2]

This breath of God returns to God when we die. [3] The flesh is symbolized by the goat, and the spirit by the sheep. [4]

1. 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗼𝗮𝗵 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵

When God observed that men did evil continually, and it grieved him, he chose to destroy all men, but one found grace; Noah. [5] Why did God choose Noah? [6] Because Noah FOUND grace. The Hebrew word for 'found' מצא 'matsa' has hidden within it 'from מ righteous צ separation א'. Though Noah was a sinner, he has separated himself from the rest. He did not participate in the corporate practice of sin. He agreed with God that it was wrong. This is the nature of repentance.

Since Noah had separated himself, God separated Noah with his family. [7]

1. 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗺

Like Noah, Abram separated himself from Ur of the Chaldees and went to Haran. [8] So God separated Abram. [9]

God separated Abram from his father's family to create a new people. [10] He then separated Isaac, Jacob, and Judah, … all the way to Jesus, the second Adam who would stand alone in the garden before obtaining his bride through his sleep/death. [11]

Each separation was a clarifying or distinguishing between two things.And each was for the purpose of joining them back together. The purpose of those who are distinguished, is to do the ministry of reconciliation.[12]

—

1. Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

1. Ge 2:7 And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

1. Ec 12:7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

1. Mt. 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

1. Ge 6:8 ¶ But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.

6, Ac 10:34 ¶ Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

1. 1Pe 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

1. Ge 11:31 And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son’s son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram’s wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there.

1. Ge 12:1 ¶ Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:

1. Ge 13:9 [Is] not the whole land before thee? separate thyself, I pray thee, from me: if [thou wilt take] the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if [thou depart] to the right hand, then I will go to the left.

1. Ge 2:21 ¶ And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

1. 2Co 5:18 And all things [are] of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;

1. 𝗔𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲 - ז

One of the big surprises of the cross was the church. It was hidden in the Old Testament scriptures. Israel never expected nor desired Gentiles (en masse) to be included in the group of God's chosen. It is only after the cross that we can look back and see the promises and prophecies. For this reason the church is called "The fellowship of the Mystery". [1]

1. 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆

Eph 5:32 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑦: 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝐼 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ.

Paul is not saying that Christ and the church continues to be a mystery. In Greek, some things which are a historical past tense, are rendered in the present tense. This is the case with is ἐστί esti here even though most translators render it in the present. We know it SHOULD be rendered in the past tense because Paul speaks frequently of the mystery having been made known. [2] [3] [4] [5]

When Paul is speaking of marriage, he is speaking of Christ and the church because every man and his wife in the OT is a prophetic riddle of Christ and the church. Paul did not impose this meaning upon the OT scriptures. He obtained it by properly reading the mystery contained therein; the mystery revealed in Christ Jesus.

With this little piece of knowledge; this key to the mystery teaching, you are now more qualified than most seminary graduates to properly interpret scripture. Shall we try?

1. 𝗪𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲

1Ti 2:11 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.

You are now the theologian. Does this speak of gender roles? Remember the key: I speak concerning Christ and the church.

How did you do? Women represent the church, the husband represents Christ. The church should learn in silence subjecting themselves to Christ. This is important: we can fill our heads with information, but learning happens when we listen to the Holy Ghost in silence as he reminds us of what we have learned and correlates it to make it sensible.

1. 𝗘𝘃𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗱𝗮𝗺

Ge 2:21 ¶ And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; You are the theologian. Does Christ get his bride at the cross, or in the resurrection? Remember also: Mt 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

How did you do? The marriage of the Lamb took place at the cross. The church became the bride of Christ in his resurrection through his death. You are NOW the bride of Christ, not at some future hypothetical time. You are NOW fruitful [6] by the fruit of the spirit [7] and you and Christ multiply by teaching [8]

—

1. Eph 3:9 And to make all [men] see what [is] the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

1. Eph 1:9 Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

1. Eph 3:3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,

1. Eph 6:19]] ¶ And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,

1. Col 1:27 To whom God would make known what [is] the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:

1. Ge 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

1. Ga 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,

1. Mt 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

1. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 - ח

𝐼𝑠𝑎 44:18 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑑: 𝑓𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑡ℎ 𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠, 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑒; [𝑎𝑛𝑑] 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠, 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

𝐽𝑜𝑏 15:12 𝑊ℎ𝑦 𝑑𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑒 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦? 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑦 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑎𝑡,

𝑃𝑠 19:8 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐿𝑂𝑅𝐷 [𝑎𝑟𝑒] 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡, 𝑟𝑒𝑗𝑜𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡: 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐿𝑂𝑅𝐷 [𝑖𝑠] 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑒, 𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠.

𝑃𝑠 73:7 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑓𝑎𝑡𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠: 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑠ℎ.

𝑃𝑟 4:21 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠; 𝑘𝑒𝑒𝑝 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡.

𝑃𝑟 23:26 𝑀𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑛, 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑦 𝑤𝑎𝑦𝑠.

Like the riddle of the chicken that crossed the road, these verses illustrate another important tool to put into your toolbox for Biblical interpretation.

When there are two things which are closely associated, they are two views of the same thing. One is spiritual and one is physical.

The heavens and the earth are two aspects of one creation or one universe. The eyes and the heart are both related to understanding. The eyes speak of intellectual understanding and the heart speaks of spiritual understanding.

Now just for fun draw a dalet ד This is the spoken word, the result of a spoken word, or a commandment. On the left side draw a line half way up: this is a hei ה and represents hearing the word of the dalet, but not understanding it. Now draw the same line all the way up. This is the chet ח and represents seeing, or understanding, the word of God. It's cool that the letters are related to each other in this way.

1. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱?

This is a great question! It is a critical question! The answer tells us how the bride is distinguished from all others. The answer goes back to the very purpose of creation and revelation. The bride understands that God alone is God.

We usurp God's prerogative when we choose things to be good or evil for ourselves. We become fake gods, which is the heart of the war between heaven and earth. The bride is reconciled to God by declaring him to be the only God. [1]

In the military it is inappropriate for officers and enlisted to fraternize since such relation destroy good order in the chain of command. How much greater is the difference between God and man, and how much more offensive to God that man should act like his equal? This is universal sin. By instinct we act like God; choosing good an evil for ourselves, as if there were no God.

We choose to do this or that because we think it is a good thing to do, not even considering if God thinks it is a good thing to do. We alone are god to us; at war with God. This is why our works are worthless [2] They are our works, not the works that God has created for us. [3]

God first declared that he was holy with : Let there be light! and ever since has been trying to teach man that he alone is God. The bride consists of those who understand this.

—

1. Pr 9:10 The fear of the LORD [is] the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy [is] understanding.

1. Isa 64:6 ¶ But we are all as an unclean [thing], and all our righteousnesses [are] as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

1. Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗲 - ט

The bride ז was a surprise of the cross because it was hidden in the mystery. But the bride doesn't just appear. She becomes the bride through the marriage of the lamb. [1] It would seem that since this is mentioned in the book of Revelation that the marriage would take place in the future; but only if you assume the Book of Revelation talks about the future.

We have seen that the primary difficulty the church has had with interpreting scripture is that it has not properly identified the genre of scripture. Why would we trust it now? Seminarians say that we should read the most symbolic book of the Bible literally! It is a book of symbols! Why would you try to read it literally?

It is a revelation of Jesus Christ. He was revealed in resurrection! The book of revelation tells the same story as the mystery contained in the OT, but now puts it on full display in it's symbolism. It is like the Rosetta stone, allowing us to interpret the symbols of the OT scripture.

1. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 '𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗯'? [𝟮]

Consider these symbols:

Marriage - לקח laqach also means teaching.

Eating - a metaphor for learning.

Supper - a lot to eat. Much doctrine.

Lamb - אמר ‘amar also means Word.

The marriage supper of the lamb was the explosion of teaching that happened after the cross.

We have seen that leaven represents teaching, and the Kingdom of heaven is teaching. [3]

We have seen that God אל was separated because he didn't understand ה, from man ים from his very name; אלהום .

1. 𝗛𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵. [𝟰]

We should not be surprised that the marriage supper of the lamb is the explosion of teaching that took place at the cross. But too many desire a comic book version where, though God says gluttony is a sin [5] [6] [7], he would tempt us to the Kingdom of heaven with an elaborate literal meal.

The marriage happened at the cross. Those who believe it happens in the resurrection do not know the scripture nor the power of God. [8] You are NOW the bride, and you are NOW invited to the marriage supper of the lamb. You are invited to participate in the explosion of doctrine that resulted from the cross.

But just as Jesus prophesied; some have bought new property [9], other have new animals (or cars) [10], others are newly married [11]; and ya know… they aren't the only ones… we all have excuses not to come to the feast of new teaching made available by the cross.

—

1. Re 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.

1. Re 19:9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed [are] they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.

1. Mt 13:33 Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.

1. Mt 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

1. Pr 23:21 For the drunkard and the glutton shall come to poverty: and drowsiness shall clothe [a man] with rags.

1. Pr 28:7 ¶ Whoso keepeth the law [is] a wise son: but he that is a companion of riotous [glutonous] [men] shameth his father.

1. Pr 23:2 And put a knife to thy throat, if thou [be] a man given to appetite.

1. Mr 12:24 And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?

1. Lu 14:18 And they all with one [consent] began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused.

1. Lu 14:19 And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them: I pray thee have me excused.

1. Lu 14:20 And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.

>>15380709

We're taught that Moses wrote Genesis when he couldn't have known anything about it 1st hand

>>15390418

See P.J. Wiseman "Ancient Re coeds and the Structures of Genesis." for evidence that Genesis was written by eye witnesses.

See P.J. Wiseman "Ancient Records and the Structures of Genesis." for evidence that Genesis was written by eye witnesses.

>>15380709

"The synoptic problem" How can we trust The Bible if the 3 Gospels can't agree with each other when they treat the same material?

>>15390481

>"The synoptic problem" How can we trust The Bible if the 3 Gospels can't agree with each other when they treat the same material?

Great question. The Gospels were written at 10-15 year intervals. They are snapshots of the doctrine taught in the Hebrew church by the apostles.

Let's back up. Jesus learned who he was and what he was to do from the Old Testament. When he read it, he read the 'mystery which was hidden from the beginning'. He saw the hidden meaning; the sensus plenior, which spoke of him and the cross and the bride.

He taught this to his disciples, but they did not understand or remember or they would not have been fearful and dejected when Jesus died.

When he arose, he gave the Holy Spirit to them to remind them of what they had been taught. They did not get 'magic knowledge' but as they studies the Old testament, they now saw Jesus in it the way that Jesus had.

Mark had a limited understanding, believing that the Gospel story started with the preaching of John the Baptist.

When Matthew wrote, they had discovered the the literal history of Israel was a proverb or parable of Christ. They could see the prophetic riddle in the story beginning with Abraham.

De 28:37 And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee.

Luke then understood the Gospel story to begin with Adam.

John understood the mystery and notarikon so well that he started the Gospel with the first word of Genesis 1:1.

The differences in the handling of teh same material reflect the additional proficiency each author had in interpreting the mystery.

When the church adopted the 'magic knowledge' theory of inspiration, they invented the Synoptic Problem.

>>15390556

If it is the teaching of the Hebrew church how come the New Testament was written in Greek?

>>15390566

> If it is the teaching of the Hebrew church why is the New Testament written in Greek?

The church was first composed of Hebrews. When Paul's ministry began, the Gentiles became Christians, but they did not wish to become Jews.

A council of Jewish Christians met and decided that the Gentiles did not need to be circumcised, and gave them some small guidance.

The Gentiles we delighted that they did not need to learn all the Jewish law. However, the sensus plenior is hidden in the Jewish law. So they missed out on it.

As the apostles were discovering more of the mystery, they threw it over the wall to the Gentile church in Greek.

The Gentiles did not understand the mystery being revealed, and merely interpreted it as a changing and evolving doctrine as Greek/Gentile theologians do today.

1. 𝗔 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - י

One of the incredible patterns in scripture which is overlooked, is that the bride is both a prostitute AND a virgin. How can this be? Remember, it is word-play and riddle which exposes a higher truth. God does not take you and clean you up. He makes you new. [1]

Lets see the pattern:

Eve was the one who transgressed [2] yet when she bore a son, there is a hint of the virgin birth in word-play. [3]

Rebekah was the virgin bride of Issac. in word-play, it appears she was not so innocent. It says that the servant 'took' Rebekah.. the same word meaning 'married'. [4] Later it says that she covered herself when she saw Isaac… was she uncovered with the servant? [5]

Together Rachel and Leah play the parts, Leah that of the prostitute as she sneaks into the bedchamber. [6]

Sarah has married a man who was not her husband. [7]

Gomer, who was a prostitute, named her first son "God sows" as a hint of the virgin birth. [8]

Mary's name means 'rebellious' and she had the taint of a prostitute, yet she was the virgin bride.

In Christ, as we become one flesh with him through marriage, we become new creatures. [9]

The flesh is that which continues to insist that you are a god, as it serves you. The spirit is that which longs for her husband. We are both a sheep and a goat. [10] Don't feed the goat. [11]

—

1. 2Co 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.

1. 1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

1. Ge 4:1 ¶ And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.

1. Ge 24:61 And Rebekah arose, and her damsels, and they rode upon the camels, and followed the man: and the servant took Rebekah, and went his way.

1. Ge 24:65 For she [had] said unto the servant, What man [is] this that walketh in the field to meet us? And the servant [had] said, It [is] my master: therefore she took a vail, and covered herself.

1. Ge 29:23 And it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him; and he went in unto her.

1. Ge 20:13 And it came to pass, when God caused me to wander from my father’s house, that I said unto her, This [is] thy kindness which thou shalt shew unto me; at every place whither we shall come, say of me, He [is] my brother.

1. Ho 1:4 And the LORD said unto him, Call his name Jezreel; for yet a little [while], and I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel.

1. Ga 6:15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

1. Mt 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

1. Eph 4:22 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱 - כ

The Son of God is a particular title used of Christ. Like all titles it displays one aspect of his character or nature. Though titles MAY sound like they are contradictory, we separate and rejoin the ideas so the we understand them better, like the vav ו.

The 'Son of God' stands in contrast to the 'Son of Man'. If these titles are taken as redundancies or equal aliases for Christ, then we don't learn anything.

The Son of God speaks of his divine nature, and the Son of Man speaks of his human nature. These are two sides of his one nature. He was not half and half as some would have him, though we can reference his divinity or his humanity separately, as a way to know him intimately.

1. 𝗚𝗼𝗱

In Hebrew the 'Son of God' is the 'bar elohin' אלהין. Elohin is a name of God which differs from Elohim only by the last letter.

'Elohim' אלהום represents God 'el' separated from his people (waters 'im' ום meaning creation ו completed in the works of the son ם.) by not understanding ה.

'Elohin' אלהון means "God separated from 'his' ין, as in those who are his, by not understanding ה." Here , 'ין' is 'his' as creation י finished by the Son of Man who died ן.

1. 𝗦𝗼𝗻

In the two titles: Son of Man and Son of God, two different words are used for 'son', emphasizing the different natures.

The Son 'ben' בן of Man ends with the nun ן representing the death of the Son of Man.

The Son 'bar' בר of God ends with the resh ר representing the Word or revelation of God.

1. 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱

The 'Son of God' title, refers to the divine nature of Christ. Melchizadek was a type of Christ since his lack of genealogical records suggested that Jesus was without beginning or ending of days. [1]

The Son of God is mentioned only once in the OT. It is Nebuchadnezzer, who declares the fourth man in the fiery furnace to be like the Son of God. [2] It is unlikely he used it as a title for a man, but was proclaiming that no one short of a divine being could be there. The idea that God would become a man is hidden in other places and will be mentioned when we speak of the nun ן as the Son of Man.

'Bar' as son also means 'pure, field, and corn or grain, and empty. Consider Jesus's saying:

Joh 12:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.

He is suggesting that the Son of God would die. The divine nature of Christ would die. Some object to the idea that the divine nature had to die, even suggesting that the Son and the Father were never separated. But death is a representation of being separate from God, it does not mean that the divine nature ceased to exist. If we do not cease to exist when we die, why would we expect Christ to? [3]

—

1. Heb 7:3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.

1. Da 3:25 He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.

1. 2Co 5:8 We are confident, [I say], and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.

1. 𝗧𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 - ל

God is separated from his people because they do not understand that he alone is God. In order to help them understand, he speaks ד, he reveals ר, and he teaches ל. This is so important to understand. God teaches. He desires for us to know him. [1] His teaching is propositional in nature. [2] [3] [4] [5] That means he says stuff. He does not just leave it to us to discover stuff.

He spoke with Adam, Eve, Cain, Abram and many others. He uses dinner theater (literally) in the dietary law. He uses historical metaphor, puns, riddles, types, shadows.

The dinner theater method is largely unknown to the church since it is part of the mystery. Consider the clean animal; It ruminates, and has a split hoof. People love to debate the dietary benefits of the clean animal, but the law has nothing to do with that. Others love to debate that there is some sort of moral connection to them. If it was morally wrong, God would not have changed his mind on it.

It is dinner theater. When you sit down to dinner you have a nightly lesson. Christ would be the clean animal. Remembering that eating is a metaphor for learning; he would ruminate on the word of God (the grass that withers; Christ who would die), and it would produce in him a separated walk or life. He was holy.

Consider the Pharisees who had a form of holiness, but it was not based in the word of God. They had a split hoof but did not ruminate. The scribes were the opposite; they ruminated upon the scriptures as they fastidiously copied them, but it did not produce a holy walk. The Pharisees and scribes were unclean animals.

God uses many ways to teach, and it is exciting to find them hidden in the mystery which is revealed in Christ. "Revealed in Christ" … do you see that no one could have understood the law of the clean animal until the time of Christ?

Oh, and don't forget… people say Jesus started his ministry when he was about 30, but he started teaching when he was 12. [6]

Here is the boring stuff:

When drawn by hand, the lamed ל starts above the upper horizontal with a small yod י signifying that the teaching does not originate with what can be known about God, but it's source is in the heart of the Father (whom we will never see). It descends as a vav וon the left since God's teaching starts in holiness. The horizontal stroke is between the upper and lower horizontals of the square text template, signifying that teaching is done at the place you can understand it. It is a shared heart, the one learning, desires to do so. The lower portion curves to the left like a small qof ק. In both it is the Son of God who dies, but in the lamed ל it does not descend into actual death, below the lower bound,since it is just the teaching of the cross.

—

1. Isa 43:10 Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I [am] he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

1. Ex 4:12 Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say.

1. Ex 4:15 And thou shalt speak unto him, and put words in his mouth: and I will be with thy mouth, and with his mouth, and will teach you what ye shall do.

1. Ex 18:20 And thou shalt teach them ordinances and laws, and shalt shew them the way wherein they must walk, and the work that they must do.

1. Mt 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded (command ד) you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

1. Lu 2:47 And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 - מ

The normal mem מ is formed by joining two letters at the top: the kaf כ, representing the Son of God, and the zayin ז, representing the bride.

The significance is that the Father chose the bride ז for the Son כ. He arranged the marriage. As a metaphor it can represent the Father, or the covenant made with man since the beginning (the promise of the Father).

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿

John uses the mem מ as 'the Father'. [1] He explains the metaphor of the consonants in heaven 'shamayim' שמים as the Father מ, the Word ר, and the Spirit ש. He does not speak of them in order, but in priority. Nevertheless we know the the shin שrepresents the spirit be cause it 'hovers' over the face of the waters' [2]: The word for heaven ש-מים contains the word for waters מים.

One of the most important choices one can make is the choice of a spouse. How is it that the Son of God permitted his Father to make it for him?

The Father-God is that invisible someone who permeates all. He is like the water to the fish and the air to the bird: We will never see him. The Son-God is the very same God who chose to be made of the same stuff we are so that he could reveal himself and teach us. They are the same God. [3] The Son is the exact representation of the substance of the Father. "I and [my] Father are one.". [4]

1. 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗻

The theme of the bride being chosen by the Father starts with Adam and Eve.[5] God not only chose Eve, but formed her for Adam.

Abraham (by his proxy servant) chose Rebekah for Isaac. [6]

Judah chose a bride for two of his sons: Er and Onan. [7]

You are chosen by the invisible God to be a companion to his visible manifestation. God wishes to dwell with men. [8] [9] [10]

1. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿מ

The arranged marriage happened in the beginning. Remember how we said that the meaning of Hebrew words is made up from the combined metaphor of its letters? Because the letters are true, the combination of the letters are true.

The word for 'in the beginning' is bereshith בראשית. Hidden within it is the covenant 'berit' ברית with man 'aish' אש at the center. The lie of the world is that God is an angry God who is just looking to squish anyone who has fun. But from the beginning he has chosen you to be his companion. He has made a covenant with you. He knows your flesh would make you a god. That's why the symbol for the bride, the zayin ז, has the name spelled out זן meaning prostitute. He did not choose you because you are good. He chose you to make you good.

—

1. 1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1. Ge 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

1. Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

1. Joh 10:30 I and [my] Father are one.

1. Ge 2:21 ¶ And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

1. Ge 24:3 And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell:

1. Ge 38:6 And Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, whose name [was] Tamar…. Ge 38:8 And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother’s wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother.

1. 2Ch 6:18 But will God in very deed dwell with men on the earth? behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house which I have built!

1. Ps 68:18 Thou hast ascended on high, thou hast led captivity captive: thou hast received gifts for men; yea, [for] the rebellious also, that the LORD God might dwell [among them].

1. Re 21:3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God [is] with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, [and be] their God.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗮𝗻 - נ

The 'Son of Man' title would appear to contradict the "Son of God" title. But there is no contradiction since they are two aspects of Christ. The letters which symbolize the Son of Man and the Son of God also appear to contradict each other.

The kaf כ and the nun נ are similar, but the kaf כ has longer horizontals. The kaf horizontal lines say that he is fully God and fully man. The shorter ones of the nun נ say that he was partially God and partially man. Again, these do not contradict, by highlight important theology.

The question of the nature of Jesus is one that still confuses and divides Christians. Almost all say that he was God and man. Some take offense if you say he was the God-man. Some say that Jesus was a super baby and could fly. Most say that Jesus used his omniscience (all-knowing) to read minds and hearts, and omnipotence (all powerful) to perform miracles, but not his omnipresence (everywhere present) limiting himself to only be in one place at one time. Others say he was imply a man.

But the doctrine is not difficult when taken one piece at a time.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

God is to us like the water is to the fish and the air to the birds. He can not be seen nor discovered except by the things he has made in order to reveal himself. [1]

He took the form of man so that he could be known. The body of Jesus was made. He was formed. He did not exist in the form of man prior to his being formed in the womb of Mary. [2]

One of the purposes of the incarnation was so that he could become our high priest; to make intercession for us. In order to do this he had to experience temptation and overcome it. [3] If he had used one ounce of his deity in order to resist sin, he would not know what it was like to be tempted.

Imagine facing God for judgement: "What's the deal God? No one is perfect!" …"Jesus was." … "Yeah, but he cheated. He had superpowers of God to resist temptation." How does that reveal the invisible God as Just or Love?

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳-𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗚𝗼𝗱

When you close your eyes, do you become blind or do you simply choose to not see? Do you lose your capacity to see, or simply not exercise it?

Jesus had all the attributes, all the power, of God, but he 'closed his eyes' to them. He chose not to use them. The nun נ reflects this with the shorter lines. He chose to not use his God-ness.

Likewise, he chose not to have a family and a career like men do. He chose instead to be the servant. He was 'partially God' and 'partially man' by choice, while being fully God and fully man by nature.

1. Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].

1. Php 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

1. Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as [we are, yet] without sin.

75.𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗮𝗻 - 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 - ס

The Father made a covenant with man at the beginning, when he created the heavens and the earth. The Son worked to make it happen.

There are several letter which are formed by combining the kaf כ with the zayin ז:

Tet ט represents a marriage on earth.

Mem מ represents the promise of the Father.

Samekh ס represents the fulfillment of the promise.

Final mem ם represents the finishing of the works required to fulfill the promise.

Each joins the Son of God כ to the bride ז.

In order to fulfill the promise, The Son had to declare the works of God ד, teach them ל, and reveal them ר, make his bride a virgin (new life) י so she would spontaneously praise God ת. He did it through his death and resurrection ק in order to marry ט and return together to the Father ש.

This was the Father's plan from the beginning. Even when his people had rebelled against him, even when he had to allow their enemies to take them captive, he reminded them: Jer 29:11 For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end.

Have you been rebellious? Do you feel like you have been taken captive by your enemies? God fulfills his promises. His purpose and covenant with you is to make you new so the He can dwell with you!

Many think that God is an angry God looking to squish them if they have fun. No. The question is not "Do you want to dwell with God?" Of course you don't. He's a stranger. Conceptually it sounds good, but you don't go running off with strangers. It is God who desires to be with you. This is his covenant from the beginning. And he fulfills his covenant. You have heard his voice… you are his sheep. He will find you. He promised.

>>15380739

How can you use the bible to prove the bible without requiring belief in the bible?

>>15380739

How can you use the bible to prove the bible without requiring belief in the bible?

>>15380739

How can you use the bible to prove the bible without requiring belief in the bible?

>>15380739

How can you use the bible to prove the bible without requiring belief in the bible?

>>15413730

Sorry. I was getting 404 errors on posting.

>>15413710

>How can you use the bible to prove the bible without requiring belief in the bible?

1. The form or genre of the Bible is such that it is an analogy to the reality of God. One need not believe the doctrine of the words of the Bibles to observe the form. Since it is impossible for men to have designed and effected the form, there is a knowledge that God did. You can know that God is.

Within the literal record, there is hidden a second meaning. The second meaning speaks of things which would not take place for thousands of years. The term 'sensus plenior' speaks of the hidden meaning of God, that the original authors did not know existed.

Theoretically, it is a layer of meaning imposed upon the literal record by God to say something different than the literal record. Modern theologians either deny the layer exists, or say that we are not authorized to read it. All the while they confess that hey cannot read the Old Testament the way that Jesus and the New Testament authors did.

The additional meaning is not invented but derived without free-for-all allegory using Notarikon. This shows how the meaning of the letters forms the meaning of the words, from which the symbols are derived to form the second meaning of the text.

If the provenance of the documents wasn't known, they would be declared fraudulent because of the anachronisms; but, the Dead Sea Scrolls validate the documents are older than the events described in the hidden layer.

1. The Bible is written as a fractal expansion of words and ideas. The primary idea is that God is the creator. It is expressed first by an invisible aleph א, by the notarikon of the first word 'bereshith', by the first sentence (Ge1:1), by the first chapter, then by the whole book.

Though sometimes these patterns are seen in the literal, they are more clearly defined by the hidden.

It is impossible for men who did not know what would happen in the future, to design the fractal expansion or have a confidence that what they observed would be repeated in the future. You can know that God is.

1. 𝗜𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗹𝗲𝘀𝗵 - ע

The ayin ע simply represents the flesh of Christ, but the doctrine surrounding it is complex and important.

1. 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲

Holiness demands separation, but the nature of love is to bring together. Jesus could not do both effectively while in the flesh. His message of love drew people to him, but his message of holiness pushed them away.

All of the letters are formed around a square. The upper line represents heavenly things, the lower; earthly. The left side is holiness, the right; grace. The letters are drawn clockwise around the square. The first thing received by men is grace. [1]

With ayin the holiness from the left is mixed with the love from the right. But it misses the right lower corner, unlike the tsadi צ which also joins holiness and grace, but does so at the cross; that point where heaven and earth connect.

During his life he was holy. [2]

And he did not come to judge, and in his interactions with men he gave grace. [3] [4]

But this mixing of holiness and love without the cross is not complete. In fact, it is confusing. All of his followers left him and he died alone on the cross. In fact, the cross is so central to the Gospel, that Paul says that anyone who preaches a gospel without the cross should be accursed. [5] [6]

1. 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗻

This will sound like heresy, but hear it closely. Jesus was made to be sin. [7] He did not commit any sin, but he became culpable of the law by it's words. The letters of the law kill. [8]

The letter of the law is what makes the prophetic riddle:

By the letter of the law, Jesus committed murder. He laid down his own life. [9] He did not commit murder, but he violated the letter of the law.

By the letter of the law, Jesus committed adultery. He took back a wife he had divorced. Israel was his bride who committed adultery. He divorced her [10], and then took her back committing adultery in the letters of the law concerning marriage. [11] He was not a literal adulterer, but became guilty by the letter.

If preaching a gospel without the cross makes one accursed, how much more does living that gospel without the cross, make one accursed? The ayin ע symbolizes that accursedness.

—

1Jo 4:19 We love him, because he first loved us.

Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as [we are, yet] without sin.

Lu 23:34 Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.

Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Ga 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

Ga 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

2Co 5:21 For he hath made him [to be] sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

2Co 3:6 ¶ Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

1Jo 3:16 Hereby perceive we the love [of God], because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down [our] lives for the brethren.

Jer 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.

De 24:4 Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that [is] abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance.

1. 𝗛𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗱𝗹𝗲𝘀 - פ

Jesus spoke in parables and riddles and explained why in one of the most "not understood" ways. He said he spoke in parables so that they would not be converted and their sins would not be forgiven. [1]

This runs contrary to the popular belief that Jesus was trying to get people to believe in him but failed. It runs counter to the popular belief that Jesus spoke in parables so that simple people could understand. He spoke in parables so that they would not understand and would not get saved. It was a judgement against them. Ouch, I just stepped on a bunch of toes, because it is a judgement against us as well.

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

No one can be saved without the cross. [2]

Old Testament saints did not get saved through sacrifices. [3]

They were given a promise of salvation through the Messiah. [4]

Therefore God would not permit anyone to be saved before the cross, or the cross would have been in vain. But God did not prevent them from believing! Their own hearts prevented them from seeing the mystery hidden from the beginning. [5]

The Son of Man, Jesus in the flesh, was born a baby and had to learn who we was and what he was to do from the scriptures; from the same mystery we can now read. It was not hidden from him because his heart was pure.

Our inability to read the mystery is a conviction of our hearts. We must become as the little child to enter the teaching [6] The kingdom of heaven IS teaching! And we must enter in as Christ did in order to see what he saw of the mystery. He and the apostles showed us how.

Jesus spoke in riddles so that AFTER the cross, so we could be honored to interpret the mystery… the riddles contained in them. [7] [8] But salvation was not available to any through teaching alone. They had to wait for the cross. [9]

—

1. Mr 4:11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all [these] things are done in parables: Mr 4:12 That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and [their] sins should be forgiven them.

1. 1Co 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1. Heb 10:4 For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

1. Heb 9:15 ¶ And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions [that were] under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

1. Mt 13:15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and [their] ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with [their] eyes, and hear with [their] ears, and should understand with [their] heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

1. Lu 18:17 Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.

1. Pr 25:2 ¶ [It is] the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings [is] to search out a matter.

1. Ps 78:2 I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings [riddles] of old:

1. Ge 3:22 ¶ And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

1. 𝗢𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 - צ

All of the parables and riddles (and hidden pictures in literal history) speak of Christ and the cross where he exchanged his righteousness for our sin. [1]

To interpret them, the keys to understanding the teaching (to the kingdom of heaven) are the pictures of the cross. When Jesus told Peter that he would be given the keys to the kingdom, Jesus immediately started teaching him where the scriptures said that he must die. [2]

The cross is central to history and to God's revelation of himself through the Son. Through the cross we see the proper balance between holiness and love in the character of God.

Like the ayin ע the tsadi צ mixes holiness and grace. The ayin excluded the cross with the long stroke from the right focusing on grace. The tsadi צ has the long stroke from the left focusing on holiness and it hits the lower right corner representing the cross; where heaven meets man.

The word tsadi צד means 'provision', where the word ayin means 'depravity'. Tsadi is the righteousness of Christ which made a provision for us; the depraved ones. [3]

Notice how the ayin and tsadi are used when added to the word son 'bar' בר. 'Barats' ברצ becomes 'in approval' or by way of formation 'son bar of righteousness צ' , where berah ברע is 'in evil' or 'son of evil'. Here evil is excluding the cross from teaching.

We also see the two letters work together in the Hebrew word for tree, which is metaphorically the cross. 'Ets' עצ is the tree. Evil and righteousness together. Christ bore our sin on the tree.

The teaching of the cross is so important that when the Greek church only wanted to know the minimum to be Christian, Paul chose to preach nothing but the cross. [4] He didn't preach church growth and tithing. He didn't teach self-improvement. When he taught how to have a stronger marriage, he wasn't even talking about marriage; he was talking about Christ and the church. [5] He saw marriage as a living sermon about Christ and the church.

When he preached the cross, his sermons came from the Old Testament. He had no other scripture. The Bereans checked his teaching against the scriptures they had. [6] Jesus prophesied about Paul being the scribe taught in the ways of the kingdom. He knew the Old Testament, and now knew how to read them because he had seen Christ. [7]

Jesus spoke in parables and riddles of the cross. [8]

—

1. Joh 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

1. Mt 16:21 ¶ From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

1. 2Co 5:21 For he hath made him [to be] sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

1. 1Co 2:2 For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.

1. Eph 5:32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.

1. Ac 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

1. Mt 13:52 Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe [which is] instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man [that is] an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure [things] new and old.

1. Ps 78:2 I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old:

1. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗻 - ק

The 'redemption of mankind' is one description of the metaphor of the qof ק. But the strokes of the letter indicate that the Son of God כ died and rose again. He conquered death. Through the conquering of death he redeemed man.

The conquering of death is God-centered; it speaks of what Christ did. Redeeming mankind is man-centered. It is true, but we like to put ourselves at the center.

By way of interpretation we always go back to the foundation. The foundation is that the invisible God wishes to be known. Implied in this teaching is the doctrine of death. But where was it taught previously? How did death come into the picture according to God's systematic theology?

The death of man is contained as a secondary metaphor in the aleph א. It is the separation of the heavens and the earth. It is a war between God and man. [1]

Man has already been judged. [2]

The death of man due to sin was known and anticipated by God even before he created the Universe. To create the Universe he used words to speak it into existence. To form those words he used letters. Embedded in the letters are the teachings that man would sin, and die, and that the Son of God would conquer death. [3]

The doctrine was not magically given to Peter, but was discerned from the doctrine contained in the Hebrew alphabet. We should find extra-biblical evidences of the alphabet metaphor. One such evidence is the non-biblical writing The Gospel of Thomas. In saying 16, Thomas use the aleph to represent war. [4]

Christ conquered death and redeemed mankind from that death. This act reveals the Holiness of God in condemning sin, and also reveals the he is Love by taking our place.

—

1. Ro 8:7 Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

1. Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. Joh 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

1. 1Pe 1:18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, [as] silver and gold, from your vain conversation [received] by tradition from your fathers; 1Pe 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: 1Pe 1:20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,

1. GOT (16) Jesus said, "Men think, perhaps, that it is peace which I have come to cast upon the world. They do not know that it is dissension which I have come to cast upon the earth: fire, sword, and war. For there will be five in a house: three will be against two, and two against three, the father against the son, and the son against the father. And they will stand solitary." The word שוא which is spelled out by the letters representing fire, sword, and war, means desolation.

1. Revealing - ר

Revelation ר is what brings God and man together. It is the center of Israel ישראל connecting man ish יש and God el אל. Man does not discover God, but he MAY discover what God has revealed. The initiative is from God to man. [1]

There are several kinds of revelation mentioned in the alphabet.

Vav ן separates things to differentiate them for better understanding.

Dalet ד is a command which includes creation which was formed at his command.

Lamed ל is teaching with a shared heart.

Pe פ teaching through types, shadows, parables, mysteries, and prophetic riddle.

Shin ש the indwelling Spirit giving life to the bride.

Rosh ר a revelation where God makes himself known.

While there are many ways that God has taught, 'revelation' speaks particularly about making himself known. The Book of Revelation makes God known. What? Wait? We have been told that the Book of Revelation is the book of future events. But it is the revealing of Christ in the mystery from the beginning.

Consider closely the first verse:

Re 1:1 ¶ The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:

1. The revelation of Jesus Christ

It is the revealing or uncovering or unveiling of Jesus Christ of whom all the scriptures speak in riddles and mystery. Jesus told his critics to search the scriptures. [2] Surely he taught his disciples how to read the scriptures properly. [3]

1. which God gave unto him

When would God have given a revelation to Jesus? Was it after he rose from the dead? Probably not. As soon as Jesus rose from the grave he was restored to his previous glory. He no longer had his eyes closed to his divinity. There was nothing that anyone could have given him since he is the God who possesses all. The only time God could have given him the revelation was while he was still the Son of Man, while he was not using his divine attributes.

Back to the foundation: No man has seen God, nor can see him. When God chose to become incarnate… to be made in the form of man, he had the same problem we do. Jesus could not see the Father while in the flesh. So before he took on flesh, he wrote himself notes in the mystery hidden from the beginning. From these notes, the boy and man Jesus learned who he was and what he was to do. This is the same mystery which we now read today hidden in the Old Testament. Anyone could have read it for themselves as Jesus did, but their hearts were hard, and so it was invisible to them.

The revelation given to Jesus was the contents of the mystery hidden from the beginning. In resurrection he could receive no revelation since he then knew beginning to end. But in the flesh, as he studied scripture with a pure heart like a little child, the Spirit guided him to understand the mystery.

—

1. Ro 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

1. Joh 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

1. Mt 16:21 ¶ From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

1. to shew unto his servants

Jesus taught HIS servants (the disciples) how to read the mystery, but they forgot what he taught them, so he gave them the Holy Spirit to remind them what he had taught them before the cross. [4]

1. things which must shortly come to pass;

If Jesus received the revelation and taught the revelation before the cross, then the thing which must shortly come to pass IS the cross.

1. he sent and signified [it] by his angel

'Sent' and 'signified' are in aorist tense, meaning that they happened and continue to happen.

Sent: The revelation of Christ was sent to John and is continuing to be sent. His writing is a snapshot of his continued learning to see Christ in the Old Testament.

Signified: The revelation was made known, and is continuing to be made known to him. It was not a one-time event.

It is unfortunate that translators choose 'angel' over 'messenger'. Jesus said he would send the Holy Spirit to remind them of what he taught. [5]

Why would he send another messenger when he told them to search the scripture, taught them how, and gave them the Spirit to remind them of his teaching? John is acknowledging that he received the Spirit who has guided him, and continues to guide him in seeing Christ in the scriptures.

—

1. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

>>15429795

:)

Thank you for gettin' rid of them lord

1. His word doesn't return void - ש

When God says something he will accomplish it. [1] The word of God IS the person of God. [2] The Word which created (bara ברא ) is the Son bar בר who spoke and created the heavens and the earth א.

When we say that the word of God doesn't return void [3], it has multiple meanings:

1. God's spoken word has creative powers; he spoke and the universe appeared from nothing. [4]

1. The Son is the Word and he accomplished his purpose. This idea is contained in the letter samekh ס and the final mem ם. [5] [6]

1. The word of God had power within itself to accomplish its purpose in the lives of men. [7]

In the shin ש there is a descending vav ן on the right which is God speaking into the void. On the left there is are two zayins ז returning. They represent the Son of Man and his bride.

The purpose of the Word of God; the Son of God, is to bring back a bride.

The metaphor of the shin can be expresses as the one who gives life to the bride, or the Spirit. Gen 1 uses the shin as the Spirit in the word heavens shamayim שמים where the Spirit ש hovers over the face of the waters mayin מים. John uses it in this fashion as well. [8]

Fire is a symbol of the Spirit and so the shin is sometimes referred to as fire in Jewish writings.

If focus is placed upon the two zayins ז, it can represent a marriage. Matthew uses it in this way referring to Yeshua fulfilling the prophecy of Emmanual. Yeshua is Yahweh with a shin ש or marriage in this heart; meaning 'God with us'.

God knows his purposes. When he says he will do it, he does it. We recognize that God has placed a caveat on this:

Jer 26:13 Therefore now amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the LORD your God; and the LORD will repent him of the evil that he hath pronounced against you.

Isn't this what God has said to each of us? We have already been condemned. [9] But he says now, "Choose you this day, whom you will serve.". [10]

—

1. Nu 23:19 God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

1. Joh 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

1. Isa 55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it.

1. Genesis 1 has the phrase God spoke ten times, and each time, something was created by the power of his word.

1. Joh 4:34 Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.

1. Joh 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

1. Mr 9:38 And John answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbad him, because he followeth not us.

1. 1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1. Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

1. Jos 24:15 ¶ And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that [were] on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

1. He completed his work - ת

"It is finished!" Was the last declaration of Jesus on the cross. [1] This was a declaration that he had fulfilled the will of the Father in the flesh ם and in the spirit ס.

Various answers from various authors:

The work Jesus was sent to do was to “seek and save that which is lost” [2] was done

Provide atonement for the sins of all who would ever believe in Him [3]) was finished

Reconcile sinful men to a holy God. [4]

The debt owed the Father was wiped away.

The fulfillment of all Old Testament prophecies, symbols, and foreshadowings of the coming Messiah

The sufferings Jesus endured while on the earth were at last over.

God’s will for Jesus was accomplished in His perfect obedience to the Father. [5]

The power of sin and Satan was finished. [6]

Though he did finish those things, if those were the only things he did, then it was NOT finished. No man has seen or heard God, so it was the purpose of the Son, in everything he did, to make the Father known. His revelation of the Father was finished.

The tov ת is the last letter of the traditional 22 letter alphabet. We still have six more to go. It is drawn with a rosh ר representing the revelation of God, with a vav ן on the left returning to God. The revelation has done its work by creating a distinct word (represented by the vav) spontaneously returning to God. This is the praise of his people expressed from their hearts.

Ps 22:3 But thou [art] holy, [O thou] that inhabitest the praises of Israel. (Israel means 'Man Is יש joined by revelation r ר to God el אל. )

This is the final purpose of it all; that we praise God and give him thanks.

Jesus declared that the perfect revelation of the Father was finished. He has reconciled holiness and love on the cross. What more could be added to the perfect revelation of the Father? Nothing! It is finished. All the prophecies hidden in the history of the Old Testament pointed forward to the cross and have now been revealed in the marriage supper of the lamb. All the prophecies hidden in the history after the cross point back to the cross, and are revealed in it.

In the same way that God worked intimately among men to produce the mystery in the Old Testament, he continues to work among men now to paint pictures of Christ in us. We are called 'Christians'; little Christ's. Each of us is a picture of Christ in some way modeling the same finished work of the cross.

I can hear you now… 'Yeah right'. Remember that Jesus used a bronze serpent to represent him. He used the symbol of evil as a prophecy of himself. He can certainly use you willingly or not. That choice is yours. Do you submit to him and participate is expressing his holiness to a lost world, or does he have to paint his picture using you in spite of your choices?

Be careful when people say there is still something to be finished. Jesus said, "It is finished."

—

1. Joh 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

1. Lu 19:10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.

1. Ro 3:25 Whom God hath set forth [to be] a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

1. Eph 2:16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

1. Heb 5:8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

1. Ac 26:18 To open their eyes, [and] to turn [them] from darkness to light, and [from] the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.

>>15380709

The church teaches we are under grace which means we have to keep the law better. Lol. Or we are under grace, except the law of tithing.

>>15380709

On his plan. They say you can't trust feelings, but that we should pray and get a feeling for his plan. Oh but you should validate your feeling by the bible. So we should get feelings as long as they agree with their interpretation.

>>15435564

It’s man on the cross. The cross itself is Christ. The only way to get from the wilderness and into the promise is to cross Jordan. The first generation doesn’t make it, only the second.

1. The Son of God died - ך

Each title for Christ focuses out attention on a different aspect of his nature, teaching, works or personality. The Son of God, represented by the kof כ speaks of his divinity. The final kof ך inherits the meaning of the kof as the Son of God, but it has two variations, and so two new highlighted doctrines.

The rounded upper corner of the kof כ had become squared. The spiritual nature of the attribute of the Son of God will do something in the flesh. The lower horizontal becomes vertical and extends below the earthly line of the square test template, suggesting descending into death.

When we speak of the Son of God dying we must understand that he did not cease to exist, but was separated from the father at the time of the cross. There are actually two separations of the father and son.

1. First separation

The first separation is in his incarnation, illustrated by the parable of the prodigal son. Luke 15:11–32

The son asked the father for his inheritance. To him his father was already dead. [1] Don't make the mistake of attributing sin to Christ. The Word of God went to the Father and remained fully God (his inheritance) as he became incarnate (separate). As he became flesh, he was just as incapable of seeing the father as we are, choosing not to use his divinity as an advantage. He had to learn who he was and what he was to do.

The Son left the presence of the father to become man, and bringing his divinity with him, spent all he had of both his divine and human nature… freely giving of himself. [2] 'Prodigal' means 'wastefully extravagant': he threw away everything he had. Now many of you thought 'prodigal' meant 'sinful' and perhaps missed the picture of Christ because of it.

After he had spent all (died on the cross being fully consumed) a famine arose in the land. [3] Since eating is a metaphor for learning, and the Word of God has died on the cross, who is there to teach?

He then descended into the abominable pit. illustrated by feeding the abominable pigs. [4]

He arose from death to return to the father. [5] And he took with him the sin of those he attached himself to. [6]

And then he was restored to his previous glory. [7] [8]

This first separation was a separation in the spirit.

1. Second separation

As the incarnate son, the Son of God is in the flesh of man. As the body of Jesus died, the Son of God nature which had been voluntarily suppressed, was set free. In his death he now had the power to fulfill his promise of performing only one sign in his own strength; that of his own resurrection. [9]

—

1. Lu 15:12 And the younger of them said to [his] father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth [to me]. And he divided unto them [his] living.

1. Lu 15:13 And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living.

1. Lu 15:14 And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want.

1. Lu 15:15 And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. Lu 15:16 And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.

1. Lu 15:18 I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,

1. Lu 15:19 And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.

1. Lu 15:22 But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put [it] on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on [his] feet:

1. Joh 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.

1. Lu 11:29 ¶ And when the people were gathered thick together, he began to say, This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.

>>15436279

Using this herneneutic requires no feelings or free-for-all allegory.

1. Finished the earthly work of the Father - ם

When things seem out of order, they are there to call our attention to something.

The Son of Man נ (of the flesh) finished the spiritual (round corners) work of the Father ס.

The Son of God כ (of the spirit) finished the earthly works (square corners) of the father ם.

The earthly works of the father involved conquering death, but the Son of Man had chosen not to use his divine power. Once the Son of God nature was grasped in death, he could finish the job.

The spiritual work of Christ was his word (teaching), his works (loving his enemies), and his life (facing temptation without sin). It is important to know that Christ accomplished all of this in the flesh because we too can accomplish God's spiritual will while still in the flesh.

We have been commanded to teach. [1] [2] [3]

We have been commanded to love: our neighbors, [4] , and our enemies. [5]

And to resist sin. [6] [7]

When Jesus died in the flesh he could honestly say "It is finished" because the work given to him to do in the flesh was finished. We know that there is nothing else to complete because the Son of God shouts from the rooftop "It is finished!" by conquering death.

—

1. Mt 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

1. 1Ti 4:11 These things command and teach.

1. 2Ti 2:2 And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.

1. Mt 19:19 Honour thy father and [thy] mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

1. Mt 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

1. 1Pe 1:16 Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.

1. 1Co 10:13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God [is] faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear [it].

1. All prophecy was fulfilled - ף

The final pe ף assumes the meaning of the pe פ as the metaphor for speaking in mystery, types, shadows, riddles and prophecy. As a metaphor is can refer to the speaker, the speaking, or the thing spoken.

The pe פ is formed with the kof כ as the Son of God, and two yods; one visible and one hidden in the body (in the white space). It signifies speaking of invisible things by speaking of visible things; to speak of heaven using earthly things.

When Jesus declared "It is finished" he had completed the spiritual work of the Father, as the Son of Man. Through the cross, all of the prophecies were fulfilled. The one who speaks of heavenly thing using earthly things will no longer speak in mystery, but face to face. [1] [2]

But in the resurrection, the Son of God finished the work of the Father hidden in all the prophecies of the earthly history. The marriage feast of the lamb, as mentioned previously, is the explosion of doctrine that happened after the cross as all the mystery was taught.

All that was hidden is revealed. There will be no more hiding eternal truths. We use the words that 'prophecy' has ceased, but we have to make sure they are understood. We are saying that their is no more hiding truth in riddles, mystery, etc.

However, prophets still operate in the realm of revealing the hidden. Peter did not get new information, but uncovered the mystery of old. [3] The same Spirit that hid away the truths of Christ, now uses people to unpack them in proper and legitimate interpretation. [4] [5]

I hear you: What of the Book of Revelation? It is of Christ revealed… at the cross. But we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

—

1. Ex 33:11 And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle.

1. Heb 1:1 ¶ God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

1. Mt 16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed [it] unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

1. Eph 3:5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;

1. 2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

Satan too preaches from the Bible (its exact words) from the pulpit to an enchanted congregation. Under hypnosis, how would one know a difference?

Religion (all) are a dead sense realm matrix preventing one from realizing their true nature and eternal divinity!

Should anyone trust this thread's desperate effort to sustain such illusion?

>>15448267

>Should anyone trust this thread's desperate effort to sustain such illusion?

If you knew anything about Christianity and the church, you would see that this thread has little to do with Gentile Christendom. This thread uses sensus plenior and restored notarikon both of which are foreign to the church you would attach me to.

You have found no defense of modern Christianity in this thread. Have you bothered to read the first post?

You are correct that Satan, like the modern church preaches from the literal Bible. When he tempted Jesus to turn stones into bread, he was reading it literally. But Jesus was the stone which the builders rejected and the stone that followed the Hebrews through the wilderness. He would become the bread as he laid down his life. These are prophetic riddles (that is NOT literal) that Jesus understood and which is taught in this thread.

When Satan read the Bible literally like the modern church, he tempted Jesus to jump off the high place. He had already done that when he left the highest heaven and became a man.

So you have only read this thread in a cursory fashion, and have not understood that I am defending the literal interpretation of scripture for being anything other than a literal history.

The meaning God intended is in the 'mystery hidden from the beginning'.

So you have missed your mark by not closely reading what you would hope to discredit.

1. Judgement was ended - ץ

The tsadi צ represented the righteousness of Christ even unto death. Another side of that metaphor is that he was the judge. See what I did there? I used the past tense and a lot of people think he will be the judge in the future.

Jesus was tempted in every way as we are, but he did not sin. [1] In living his perfect life, he removes all of our excuses and put us to shame; he judged us. We cannot claim that resisting sin is harder for us or impossible. We have been judged already. [2]

The final tsadi declares that judgement is ended! It ended at the cross. Why do you fear the end of the age? Why fear his return? You have already been judged; already been condemned; and already been redeemed by the blood (life is in the blood) of the lamb!

The name of the letter tsadi when spelled as a word (technically a 'gate' [3]) צד means provision. You have been provided for, and therefor there is no judgement.

What is the purpose of the cross if not to provide grace? Elisha removed the axe; a symbol of judgement [4] from the water; a symbol of the word of God. [5]

Judgement has been removed from the word of God. And since Jesus is the Word of God, he holds no judgment in his heart either.

—

1. Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as [we are, yet] without sin.

1. Joh 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

1. Two-letter combinations are referred to as gates by Jews and sub-roots by Greeks.

1. Mt 3:10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

1. 2Ki 6:6 And the man of God said, Where fell it? And he shewed him the place. And he cut down a stick, and cast [it] in thither; and the iron did swim.

1. '''Co-heirs with Christ - <final shin looks like a shin ש with four prongs>

Ro 8:17 ¶ And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with [him], that we may be also glorified together.

The teaching that we will be intimate with God was hidden from the beginning. The other doctrines of Christ start with the metaphor of a letter, which is expanded and clarified as words are built from it. But the final shin is not used to form any words. The idea presented by it was not to be discussed.

The doctrine which was hidden is that we will be so intimate with God, that we might even thing ourselves to be gods, if we had not already declared God alone to be God. [1] Men of the flesh would imagine themselves as gods, which idea would build up the flesh which already behaves as if it is God. It is only when we are in a proper relationship built in the truth that God alone is God, can we become so intimate.

Since the final shin is not used in any words, there is not a character for it in the fonts. It looks like the shin ש with an extra zayin ז returning on the left side. As Christ returns with his bride, she is filled by the spirit; her spirit is his spirit. They are one flesh. [2]

Consider all the words formed by 27 letters of the Hebrew alphabet. Using those words, all thing that were created were created by them. All ideas known to man can be expressed using them. What happens when a 28th letter is made available for forming words? Perhaps that will be the basis for that intimate relationship with God when words which are unspeakable now are made known so that we might know God better.

—

1. Isa 43:10 Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I [am] he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

1. 1Jo 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

>>15380709 Church teaches us to doubt God and the Bible

>>15380739 God is knowable

>>15414820 The two layers of the Bible an analogy to the two layers of reality

>>15380785 Biblical dualism

>>15381012 The certainty

>>15381094 Systematic theology God's way

Summary

By the end of the dirt century, the church had done those things they were warned against doing:

• They has lost their first love by deifying Mary.

• Thy had become the Nicolaitans (conquerors of the laity) by establishing the priesthood.

• They has adopted the doctrine of Balaam by compromising withthe government and the flesh.

• They had become Judaisers by adopting the Jewish ritual in their mass, and making 'sacraments' as effectual instruments of grace as if they were pagan ritual.

When the Gentile church began, they wanted to be Christian, but they did not want to learn Hebrew of to follow the law given to Moses. The council at Jerusalem gave them a couple guidance rules And Paul chose not to teach them the rich mystery, but to know only Christ and him crucified.

Though Paul's 'lite' version of the teaching of the scriptures was sufficient for salvation, they lost the richness of the scriptures by not reading it in Hebrew.

By 400 AD, when Jerome wanted to learn Hebrew, he could not find believing Jews in the church. He had to go to disbelieving Jews. They lied to him and obfuscated the prophetic riddles so the Jerome could not see Christ in the Hebrew language.

About 600 AD they added vowels to the language and further obfuscated the prophetic riddle by changing a single word into multiple words with different vowels.

When the Reformers broke away from the Nicolaitans, they did not have the tools available to read the Hebrew the way Jesus and the NT authors did. Reviewing modern seminary texts on sensus plenior shows that theologians too must confess that they cannot read the scriptures the way Jesus did.

The unique nature of the Hebrew language known as Notarikon, where a word gets it's meaning from the combined meaning of the letters, enables the intended meaning of the word to be understood without free-for-all allegory. It removes the guess work.

When the scripture is read, the second layer or meaning is not imposed upon it by the reader, but is discovered through the meaning of the letters and word-play. You must become as a little child to grasp the word-play.

Since each letter has meaning, the alphabet itself, when read in order, is a message from God. It is the primary doctrine of the Bible.

God spoke and created the heavens and the earth. He revealed to man .. that he pursued them with a .. command .. which they did not understand .. and it distinguished them .. as the bride… When they understood .. through the marriage .. they became a new creation. The Son of God .. taught .. the promise of the Father. .. The Son of Man .. fulfilled the promise … by becoming flesh. .. He spoke in parables and riddles. .. He exchanged his righteousness for our sin. .. The Son of God died and rose again .. revealing .. that his word returns with an increase. His completed work is your new life. The Son of God died … and finished his declared works. .. The Son of Man died and was restored to glory. .. All prophecy was completed. .. Judgement was ended. .. We became co-heirs with Christ

>>15456709

dirt = first

>>15456709

Religious systems of men try to convince us that Jesus is a man and we are still waiting for him to appear. When he does appear some day everything will be good for certain ones and bad for others. But the religion man teaches is carnal. They don’t know any better, and generally because they just follow along with whatever the people before taught, but sometimes intentionally misleading (yet still based on carnal thought) for cash flow $$$$$$

>15380709 (OP) Church teaches us to doubt God and the Bible

>15380739 (You) God is knowable

>15414820 (You) The two layers of the Bible an analogy to the two layers of reality

>15380785 (You) Biblical dualism

>15381012 (You) The certainty

>15381094 (You) Systematic theology God's way

Summary

By the end of the dirt century, the church had done those things they were warned against doing:

• They has lost their first love by deifying Mary.

• Thy had become the Nicolaitans (conquerors of the laity) by establishing the priesthood.

• They has adopted the doctrine of Balaam by compromising withthe government and the flesh.

• They had become Judaisers by adopting the Jewish ritual in their mass, and making 'sacraments' as effectual instruments of grace as if they were pagan ritual.

When the Gentile church began, they wanted to be Christian, but they did not want to learn Hebrew of to follow the law given to Moses. The council at Jerusalem gave them a couple guidance rules And Paul chose not to teach them the rich mystery, but to know only Christ and him crucified.

Though Paul's 'lite' version of the teaching of the scriptures was sufficient for salvation, they lost the richness of the scriptures by not reading it in Hebrew.

By 400 AD, when Jerome wanted to learn Hebrew, he could not find believing Jews in the church. He had to go to disbelieving Jews. They lied to him and obfuscated the prophetic riddles so the Jerome could not see Christ in the Hebrew language.

About 600 AD they added vowels to the language and further obfuscated the prophetic riddle by changing a single word into multiple words with different vowels.

When the Reformers broke away from the Nicolaitans, they did not have the tools available to read the Hebrew the way Jesus and the NT authors did. Reviewing modern seminary texts on sensus plenior shows that theologians too must confess that they cannot read the scriptures the way Jesus did.

The unique nature of the Hebrew language known as Notarikon, where a word gets it's meaning from the combined meaning of the letters, enables the intended meaning of the word to be understood without free-for-all allegory. It removes the guess work.

When the scripture is read, the second layer or meaning is not imposed upon it by the reader, but is discovered through the meaning of the letters and word-play. You must become as a little child to grasp the word-play.

Since each letter has meaning, the alphabet itself, when read in order, is a message from God. It is the primary doctrine of the Bible.

God spoke and created the heavens and the earth. He revealed to man .. that he pursued them with a .. command .. which they did not understand .. and it distinguished them .. as the bride… When they understood .. through the marriage .. they became a new creation. The Son of God .. taught .. the promise of the Father. .. The Son of Man .. fulfilled the promise … by becoming flesh. .. He spoke in parables and riddles. .. He exchanged his righteousness for our sin. .. The Son of God died and rose again .. revealing .. that his word returns with an increase. His completed work is your new life. The Son of God died … and finished his declared works. .. The Son of Man died and was restored to glory. .. All prophecy was completed. .. Judgement was ended. .. We became co-heirs with Christ

98 Father אב

The Hebrew word 'ab' means 'father, green shoot, fruit'

'Father' is the primary metaphor from the notarikon since "He spoke and created the heavens and the earth א then revealed himself to man ב."

The identifying attribute of a father is that he gives life.

The other meanings for 'ab' אב refer to these attributes as secondary metaphor.

'Green shoot' is identified as evidence that the Father was there as the source of the first life.

'Fruit' is evidence that he is also the source of the second life. The green shoot of a tree sprung up and then bore fruit; the second life.

God gives us our life in the flesh, and then when we are born again, our life in the Spirit.

>>15465196

Except we are not the one that is born again. The man child, which is the two witnesses, is born again, both in and through us. We are merely the container.

>>15467207

Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Joh 3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

>>15467462

Ok, that’s the “man” in man child, now keep reading and find the “child”.

When the Lord said, Be fruitful and multiply, was he talking about us or was he talking about himself? When the Lord said, You must be born again, was he talking about us or was he talking about a replication of himself through us?

What exactly is a tithe?

>>15469749

"This thread will examine sensus plenior and notarikon as verifiable ways of knowing God."

Your question "When the Lord said, Be fruitful and multiply, was he talking about us or was he talking about himself?" demonstrates that you deny the two layers of meaning, or the sensus plenior. It talks about both as prophetic riddle.

It makes no sense to debate one decides a matter before it is heard. Sorry.

>>15469749

>>15471628

>It makes no sense to debate one who decides a matter before it is heard. Sorry.

The methods of sensus plenior and notarikon are verifiable so they lend themselves to collaboration, not debate.

1. Rules

The prophets of old packed away the mystery. [1] [2] As they wrote, God concealed the mystery in their words using prophetic riddles. [3] [4]

They wrote about a literal history, while God hid prophecies of Christ in double meanings. [5]

Modern prophets unpack prophecies with the help of the Spirit to solve the prophetic riddles. [6] They validate what the Spirit tells them, by these rules.

—-

1. What is the mystery? <stub>

1. Pr 25:2 [It is] the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings [is] to search out a matter.

1. What are prophetic riddles? <stub>

1. Ps 78:2 I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings [riddles] of old:

1. Joh 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

1. 2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

1. Rules: Divine meaning

Since God’s word is established forever [1]; a metaphor/shadow means the same thing everywhere is it used.

If a donkey is a metaphor of a prophet, everywhere there is a donkey, it is a metaphor of a prophet. This rule alone makes the metaphors humanly impossible to fabricate as it requires the interlocking of a double entendre found in all the scriptures. This keeps us in awe.

The use of free-for-all allegory in other theological works has been properly criticized because allegorical or metaphoric meanings produced in this manner have no way to be verified; how do you know it is true?

This rule of "Divine meaning" dis-allows free-for-all allegory by setting an impossible standard for the use of allegory such that every scripture participates in a hidden picture of Christ.

Such a phenomenon is impossible for men to produce and therefore when we observe it occurring, we can have confidence that it is God’s intended meaning.

Consequence of lack of Divine meaning: The resulting interpretation is likely to be free-for-all allegory and eisegesis.

—-

1. 2Sa 7:25 And now, O LORD God, the word that thou hast spoken concerning thy servant, and concerning his house, establish [it] for ever, and do as thou hast said.

1. Rules: Christocentric

Since the riddle of Samson [1] tells us Christ is the answer to all the prophetic riddles;[2] if the shadow (prophetic riddle) doesn’t look like Christ, it isn’t a good shadow. This keeps us focused.

Jesus told the disciples on the road to Emmaus that all the scriptures spoke of him [3], and chastised the scribes and Pharisees for searching the scriptures to seek life, but rejecting him, since they spoke of him. [4]

If we don’t see Christ in the scriptures, we have missed the primary purpose of the scriptures. [5] And if Christ is not central to a proposed interpretation, it is to be rejected. This rule alone separates the mystery[6] from Gnosticism[7], Kabbalah[8] and Midrash [9].

Consequence of lack of Christocentric meaning: You miss the point of the scriptures in revealing God through Christ.

—-

1. Jud 14:18 And the men of the city said unto him on the seventh day before the sun went down, What [is] sweeter than honey? and what [is] stronger than a lion? And he said unto them, If ye had not plowed with my heifer, ye had not found out my riddle.

1. Samson's riddle <stub>

1. Did Jesus say that all the scriptures spoke of him? <stub>

1. Joh 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

1. Joh 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:

1. The mystery <stub>

1. Gnosticism <stub>

1. Kabbalah <stub>

1. Midrash <stub>

1. Rules:Rule - Self-contained

Since we are to let every man be a liar and God be true [1]; outside references are not required to solve the riddles and see the shadows. This keeps us devoted.

Not only are we not going to bring in extra-biblical books to determine the meaning of scripture, but we will not make apostles out of historians, document critics or scholars by elevating their writings concerning the meaning of scripture.

Historian

We miss the meaning that Jesus intended as he confronted the rich man who asked how to get into the kingdom, if we accept a historian's report that here was a gate in Jerusalem called "the eye of the needle" [2]. Do we really believe that people were incapable of understanding the word of God until this little gem was 'discovered' by a 'professor' who needed to publish or perish?

Document critics

We will not make apostles out of document critics. The mystery, written in the same words used for the literal history, act like security paper. If one were to change the words of the literal history, the mystery would be scrambled. If there are errors to documents that have been received, they will be plain when the hidden narrative is discerned. God said he would protect every jot and tittle of his word [3], so we know that one of the variant documents is true.

Scholars

We will not make apostles out of scholars. Scholars present opinions. They get no credit for presenting old truth, they must perpetually come up with something novel to get their name cited in other papers. You pastor has more motivation to teach truth than scholars.

If we reference historians, document critics, or scholars, it will be to add color to the discussion, and more often than not, to refute popular myths they perpetuate.

Consequence of using outside resources: You make the historian, the document critic, or the scholar into an apostle, giving him power over the interpretation of scripture.

—

1. Ro 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

1. Mt 19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

1. Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

1. Rules:Rule - Self examination

Jer 17:9 The heart [is] deceitful above all [things], and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Our assumptions about scripture and the rules we use to guide our interpretation effect the ultimate meaning that we get from scripture. It is important to evaluate those assumptions and rules to ensure that they permit the scriptures to speak for themselves rather than permitting us to impose our own meaning upon them.

My assumptions and convictions are these:

1. The Bible is the word of God which has been protected for us in such a manner that it is considered infallible in every jot and tittle. [1]

2. It is acknowledged that there are variant texts in existing manuscripts. By using the proper methods of interpretation, as taught by the apostles, errant manuscripts may be discerned by the 'security paper' of the mystery. [2]

3. The meaning of the Bible is contained in multiple layers as described by the church from the earliest days [3], as a literal and a spiritual layer. These layers are in complete agreement with each other in every way. Apparent contradictions are intentional riddles describing two sides of the issue. [4]

4. The hidden spiritual layer is discerned using methods taught by the apostles in the New Testament. It is called the meat of the gospel, whereas the literal meaning is called the milk of the gospel. The milk is sufficient for salvation. The meat provides the spiritual nourishment to enable a mature faith and walk.[5]

The rules are discerned using the same methods as discerning the mystery, so it should be expected that those practicing literal methods may disagree with how the rules are determined. That doesn't matter. The mystery needs to be evaluated to see if it is self-consistent as well as if it produces verifiable, meaningful, and orthodox [6] results.

Consequence of not doing self-examination:: The measure of truth becomes the individual and the standard changes to meet your own goals.

—-

1. Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

1. What is the 'security paper of the mystery? <stub>

1. What layers? <stub>

1. Handling contradictions <stub>

1. Satan's spoiled milk <stub>

1. Christian orthodoxy <stub>

1. Rules: Rule - Humility

Since God has said that not a jot or tittle will pass away [1]; until one knows why each jot and tittle is there, a complete understanding has not been derived. This keeps us humble.

Such humility is exemplified by one who listens to others’ observations based on scripture, and tests all things to hold fast to those things which are good [2]. Such humility is missing in one who insists that his opinion [3] is correct, and uses phrases like “The Bible says so” while pulling passages out of context and displaying an attitude of unwillingness to discuss the meaning or context of those passages.

It is a shameful behavior to decide a matter before it is heard. [4]

Consequence of lack of humility The scriptures are wrested or twisted to mean what you want them to mean.

2Pe 3:16 As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

—

1. Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

1. 1Th 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

1. Opinions don't count? <stub>

1. Pr 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him.

1. Rules: Rule - Complete

Since man shall live “by every word” [1] [2]; a doctrine is not sound until it sums up and includes all that God has said about it. [3] This keeps us searching.

This attitude of searching recognizes that the Bible is full of meaning, and that perhaps one person in his own studies has not yet identified or considered all the applicable passages. This attitude is missing when a few verses are used as a shotgun to force a discussion to a preconceived conclusion.

A doctrine must sum up and include everything the Bible says about it in the literal and hidden layers.

Consequence of lack of completeness Conclusions may be premature. [4]

—-

1. Mt 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

1. Lu 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

1. De 8:3 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every [word] that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.

1. Pr 18:13 ¶ He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him.

1. Rules: Rigorous

Since every word concerning life and death must be established by two or three witnesses [1]; every shadow/symbol must have at least two supporting scripture witnesses.

This means we cannot define a shadow with a single verse. The shadows speak of Christ and the cross. There is no other topic which addresses life and death for all men. This keeps us rigorous in methodology. A shadow is a hidden meaning which is not contained in the literal meaning [2].

Shadows are not the product of a wild imagination and are therefore verifiable by the scriptures. When a shadow has two or three witnesses, it should be regarded as a tentative meaning. This rule does not permit three verses to be the end of discussion, but specifically forbids a single verse from becoming definitive.

Consequence of lack of rigor: Conclusions may be premature and/or wrong.

—

1. De 17:6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; [but] at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.

1. Heb 10:1 ¶ For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.

1. Rules: Conclusion

If one skims through the rules without comprehending them, or like Naaman hears the instruction but is insulted at their apparent simplicity [1], the results of exegesis will look like the free-for-all allegory of others that we all reject.

It should not be expected that using the 'Syrian waters' of free-for-all allegory should produce a result any different than before.

The rules must be used rigorously to discern the truth of scripture.

—

1. 2Ki 5:11 But Naaman was wroth, and went away, and said, Behold, I thought, He will surely come out to me, and stand, and call on the name of the LORD his God, and strike his hand over the place, and recover the leper.

1. Ge 1:1

Ge 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

1 בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ׃

This verse is an introduction to Genesis 1. It stands alone from the enumeration of days. It repeats the declaration of the invisible aleph and the first word of the verse in declaring that God is the creator. It has a bookend in Ge 2:4,5[1]. By this verse alone with it's repeating declaration that God is the creator, there can be no doubt that the primary purpose of creation is to make the invisible God known.

—

1. Ge 2:4 ¶ These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, Ge 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.

>>15474064

1. The invisible aleph א

The rabbis ask the question "Why does the Torah [1] begin with the second letter of the alphabet rather than with the first?" [2]

The Greeks (and probably you) think that this is a stupid question, but only because you do not understand how to read the mystery which was hidden from the beginning [3]. The early Jews knew how to read it but their answer misdirects us because the true meaning of the aleph cannot be admitted since it will reveal Christ as the creator. The primary metaphor of the aleph is: God spoke and created the heavens and the earth.

The reason they cannot admit this is because the first three visible letters spell bar-a. 'Bar' is translated 'son' and later it will be shown to be the Son of God. It says: The Son (of God) spoke and created the heavens and the earth. [4] It is easy to see why they want to hide this.

The aleph is a silent letter and here at the beginning of the Torah it is also invisible. From this, the Berean discerns that when God spoke and created the heavens and the earth, he did it when there was no one there to see or hear him do it.

Job 38:4 ¶ Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.

Isa 43:10 … before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

—

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah

1. http://jewishexponent.com/so-why-it-torah-begins-%E2%80%98bet%E2%80%99

1. Hidden mystery <stub>

1. Col 1:16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

>>15474064

1. It is imagined that there are conflicting accounts of creation in Ge 1 and Ge2. This misconception is due to mis-identifying the end of the first pericope.

Ge 2:5 belongs to the first pericope, not the second.

Ge 1:1 Inclusio

The inclusio of Genesis 1 is complicated because there is another pattern within it. Instead of a simple ABA pattern, it appears as ABCDABCDA.

There are apparently three A's if 'heavens' is defined as A. But if A is defined as 'heavens and earth', then the pattern is ABCDBCDA. The apparent middle A is not legitimate since it is forced; 'heaven' and 'earth' are mentioned but separated by other words.

The author tells the reader that the Final A points to the A in Ge 1:1 rather than the illegitimate A when he defines the final A; he points to the beginning A.

He describes the first A: "Ge 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and [there was] not a man to till the ground."

The illegitimate A is after the plants of Day 3 had sprung up.

>>15474064

1. Ge:1 בראשית

In the beginning בראשית [God] created ברא six שית

The invisible and silent aleph said when God spoke and created the heavens and the earth, there was no one there to see it or hear it.

From the nothingness of the aleph, a fractal-like expansion occurs declaring that God is the creator. From the void of the aleph comes the first word of revelation: בראשית.

Using notarikon, the word is split into composite parts.

בראשית ברש-שית (read right to left): In the beginning בראשית created ברא six שית.

Ge 1:1 is an introduction to Ge 1. It is not a separate creation as some have surmised. This will be made clear when את is examined. All of the heavens and all of the earth were created.

Ge 1:1 expresses creation as a view from a timeless eternity. Within that view, the first word declares within that singular creation event, there will be six divisions.

In the beginning [God] created six.

This expression does not declare what the six things will be. It is designed to set an expectation or anticipation.

>>15471628

It’s ok if you can’t answer the question.

1. Ge 1:1 בראשית

Notarikon reveals other doctrine

ב-ראש-י-ת : in ב - the authority of (heads of) ראש - the creator י – (makes it an object) ת

בר(אש)ית : a covenant ברית with man אש at the center

בר-אשי-ת : the son בר – offered total devotion (fire offerings) אשי – (makes it an object) ת

ב-ר-א-ש-י-ת - a revelation to man ב it is revealed ר that God spoke and created the heavens and the earth א his word did not return void ש his plan for creation י was finished ת

Additional meaning to the literal record is not invented by the reader. They already exist in the letters and words within the literal text.

1. Ge 1:1 'bara' ברא

1 בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ׃

The second word of Ge 1: is 'bara' translated as 'created'.

As a child learns language, if he learns that coffee is hot, every coffee is hot until he learns otherwise. This is true of the Hebrew hermeneutic as well.

In Ge 1, whenever 'God said', he created something. Therefore 'bara is also the 'Word which created.

As We look into the notarikon, 'the son בר created the heavens and the earth א'.

John 1:1 tells us that the word was God. From ברא: the son created, and the son is the word which created.

Observe that ברא is in בראשית. From this John discerns that 'in the beginning was the Word… and the Word was God (since the Word created)".

Joh 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

1. Ge 1:1 'Elohim' אלהים'

1 בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ׃

The third word of Ge 1:1 is אלהיםtranslated 'God'.

John says in John 1:

1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word,

ברא is in בראשית

and the Word was with God,

ברש is next to אלהים

and the Word was God.

ברא is the son בר who created the heavens and the earth א

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

The same son בר was in בראשין with א (the creator)

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

His creation י was finished ם

—

4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

5 ¶ And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

Elohim has three puns "not dark", 'life' and 'bread'.

John uses two of these puns to say that God, the son, was the light and the life.

It is a childish pun or riddle.

Mr 10:15 Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom [teaching] of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.

The bible was construed by sun worshipers and other world evil. Religion(s) are simply used to capture the people farm as livestock for slaughter.

Stop volunteering for their matrix game and turn your gaze within, towards the light…and step out of this birth cycle enslavement to realize your true nature is energy and eternal.

>>15486250

This thread is showing what has not been seen since the first century. The nature of the language shows that it is of divine origin.

It does not speak of religion, so you have missed the mark again. But thanks for the bump.

You have no sauce.

1. 'Ge 1:1 Elohim

"God אל separated from his people ים by ignorance ה"

This is the primary doctrine of the Bible. The invisible God, who cannot be seen or heard, is unknown to his people. Every other doctrine must find it's foundation in this.

Because he is unknown, and wants to be known, the corollary is that he teaches. God teaches!!

The recalcitrant child believes he is being punished, but God disciplines those he loves [1]

If you imagine that God is angry with you, you have misjudged him. He is angry at your sin: that you do not acknowledge him as God [2]. He is angry at your sin and is teaching you.

He created a world where you reap what you sow; he gives you what you want; and let's you wallow in the consequences.

You desire to decide good and evil for yourself. You decide to judge the world and God. The consequences of sowing judgement is reaping judgement. Your sin creates pain suffering and death. As you suffer you realize that you are not God. You have no ability to judge and no power to save from judgement.

The system is perfect in confronting your sin. And you create your own discipline.

But God, in his love, is patient for you to learn that he is God. God is not an angry God who requires appeasement. He is a Holy God that loves you. You cannot understand his love until you understand his holiness.

1. Heb 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.

1. Ro 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

1. Ge 1:1 את

1 בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ׃

The aleph א is the first letter of the alphabet. The tov ת is the last letter of the ordinary alphabet (first 22 letters). [1]

The word is not translated in Ge 1:1. It is similar to the Greek 'alpha and omega'. It is used before 'heavens' and before 'earth'. From this it is discerned that Ge 1:1 is the introduction to the chapter.

In the beginning God created [everything from beginning to end of] the heavens and [everything from beginning to end of] the earth.

אר 'God spoke and created the heavens and the earth א his revelation was completed with a new life returning to him ר..'

Bereshith בראשית said that in the beginning he created six, and in those six he created all things את that are created in the heavens and the earth.

1. There are six 'final form' letters. Each of the ordinary letters has a meaning. The final form letters are paired with an ordinary letter but are found at the end of a word. This idea is not foreign. In English we have a set of Capital letters which are found at the beginning of names and sentences.

"The Mystery of Satan and The Devil"

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-mystery-of-satan-and-the-devil_pVy3PIqeAKwMw35.html

Free .pdf

https://anonfiles.com/5820md3fu4/The_Mystery_of_Satan_and_the_Devil_B_F_Jackson_pdf

1. Ge 1:1 השמים

1 בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ׃

The fifth word is 'the heavens'. It is a dual form with a prefix ה for 'the'. The idea of 'heavens' is expressed in several ways prior to this word.

When we dissect the aleph א it is a yod י vav ו yod י.

There are two representations of creation represented by two yods, but there is only one creation. From this it is discerned that when there are two things, they are two representations of one thing.

In one creation there are two parts: heavens and earth.

The invisible aleph, which was verbalized one way as " God spoke and created the heavens and the earth" has a primary metaphor of creation by separation.

We can see in it the primordial idea of "the spirit fluttered on the fave of the waters" [1] where one yod is the waters (or creation) above and the other yod is the waters (or creation) below.

The same idea is expressed in the first word בראשית. The Son בר was separated from the creation י being finished ת by the Spirit אש (fire). The Holy Spirit judged the son of God when the Son had been made to be sin. The waters above were separated from the waters below by the Spirit.

Now the word heavens ש - מים expresses that the Spirit ש (the one who gives life to the bride and gives the Word an increase) is on the face of the waters מים. Two doctrines have sprung from the invisible aleph in a fractal form.

1. Ge 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

>>15489095

Sorry, but the Roman Catholic Church is what brought us the perverted bible (KJV) and each version thereafter…religion is a satanic enslavement construct which keeps the faithful in the birth cycle matrix!

>>15499078

Sorry, this thread has little to do with the Catholic Church.

You keep demonstrating an amazing lack of ability or will to read the rest of the thread.

If you haven't noticed, I am using Hebrew, without the vowels that were added about 600 AD. This predates Jesus as validated by the Dead Sea Scrolls, and so predates the Catholic church.

Furthermore I have already identified that the Catholic church (the Gentile church) had gone astray by the end of the first century.

>>15456709

If you are referring to the footnotes where I quote the KJV, that is simply a convenience to avoid having to use copyright notifications. Use whatever version you wish and address whatever error you think the KJV has. I know there are some translation issues with the KJV

and am happy to point them out.

'Agape', though a Greek word, is also a transliteration from Hebrew meaning 'the combatants'. This is the love that one gives an enemy with no expectation of return. While we were sinners and enemies of God, Christ dies for us.

Mammon, though a Syriac word meaning 'money' is a Hebrew transliteration meaning 'the believing ones'. You cannot serve God and self.

When using Notarikon, the meaning of words can be discerned without outside influences like the Catholic church.

The word בצקלנו occurs only once in the Bible. Translators don't know what it means; some guessing it is 'knapsack', and others guessing it is 'husk'.

Using notarikon it is: dough בצק taught us לנו.

It is part of the running imagery of Christ as the bread. As the grass he was given to the cattle to eat; he is surrounded by cattle at his birth while he laid in the feeding trough.

He was the seed of the woman. As the seed he must die to be fruitful.

His rejection by men is symbolized by beating and threshing of flour.

The dough is baked to symbolize his rejection by God as he was made to be sin for us.

His body is the bread; given for us.

>>15499078

The Dragonborn is coming!

1. Ge 1:1 heavens and earth

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

John derives his doctrine from the notarikon of the words 'heaven' and ;earth'.

heavens שמים :

ש - the Spirit that gives life to the bride as she returns to God with the Word/Son.

מ - the Father who arranged the marriage (teaching)

ם- the Son finished the promise.

earth:

א - the Spirit who was on the face of the waters

ר - the water representing Gods revelation through his people

ץ- the blood of the righteous one who exchanged his righteousness for our sin.

THe cross was the plan from the beginning.

1. Notarikon makes possible the multiple meanings of sensus plenior. While men wrote a history, God wrote of the cross.

Consider Ge 2:21 ¶ And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

The following words have more than one meaning and create the possibility for double entendre:

sleep = death

took = married

one = certain

rib = limping side

closed up = delivered

flesh = mankind

God caused Christ to die.

Christ married the church.

Limping side: a prophetic riddle concerning Gethsemane

Christ delivered mankind

The limping side pattern is recognized in the seed of the women which had the bruised heel, Jacob's withered thigh, and Jesus who did not wish to die, but diminished his fleshly will to be obedient unto death.

1. Compare Johnathon Edwards's treatment of the same passage.

Though Jonathan Edwards strove to see Christ in all the scriptures, he could only see the hints and filled in the gaps with instinct and allegory. He often did well, but this is not sensus plenior.

Ge 2:21 ¶ And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

Thus God's making Eve of Adam's rib, was to typify the near relation and strict union of husband and wife, and the respect that is due, in persons in that relation, from one to the other. (Jonathan Edwards, Volume 9, Page 12)

Edwards ignored Paul's statement that marriage spoke of Christ and the church (Eph 5:32 ). The ante-type target of Edwards in this passage is marriage, falling short of the SP target of Christ.

We see you Satan, continuing your deception of duality you've played for millennium upon millennium. Your evil tongue eloquence only works on those already captured. You know, we see…the Christed only worship the source, and you're NOT that creator! This dead realm matrix is ALL yours, we will not be drawn by your dark lower sense practices, we've moved beyond your reach.

>>15509332

Your Christ only has partial authority by your own admission, and is therefore a false Christ. [1]

Mt 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

1. "This dead realm matrix is ALL yours,"

1. Nature of scripture

The word 'scripture' simply means 'writings'. The writings of the Old Testament have a particular nature which is discernible by sensus plenior. Every word of every verse of every chapter of every book apparently participates in painting the prophetic riddle concerning Christ.

The sensus plenior acts like security paper. If the text were changed, it would change the hidden layer as well. As long as the hidden layer is intact, we have confidence the text is intact.

The Gospels appear to be sermon notes. They were written at ten to fifteen year intervals to summarize the teaching that was taking place in the Hebrew churches. They were then given to the Gentile churches to get them up to date.

Why was the doctrine changing? It wasn't really; not in substance. It was being polished and being added to as they learned to read the mystery better with time.

Mark began the gospel with the preaching of John the Baptist. Matthew was able to push it back to Abraham by seeing that Israel was a living 'dinner theater'. Luke pushed it back to Adam by understanding that marriage represents Christ and the church. And John understood the notarikon, which opened up the sensus plenior to him in a greater fullness than seen before.

The gospels were delivered to Greek churches by 'interns'; messengers who used them as outlines for teaching. As they taught on the genealogy of Christ in Matthew, each person listed was a sermon note to speak of Christ from the history of that person in the OT and to discern titles of Christ. The depth to which they could teach was limited by the interest, or lack thereof, that the Gentiles had for Hebrew things.

Paul encountered the same disinterest saying that he chose to know only Christ and him crucified while among them.

The dispersion of the Gospel manuscripts into many copies spread amongst the nations was an allegory of how the hidden OT Gospel was made known and spread among the nations. Just as the Gospel was hidden in many ways, it was now proclaimed in many ways.

Is it inerrant? That is a silly question. It is a silly Greek question. The Greeks deified Mary and then deified the bones of dead saints and other relics, and now deify the writings. They are writings which contain the teaching of the apostles and eyewitnesses to the events of the life of Jesus, his death and resurrection. And they are a commentary on the OT. The OT is what gives them authority as the hidden prophetic riddles are made known through them.

The Greeks demand submission to the Nicolaitans (conquerers of the laity) by inventing silly questions by which to judge and manipulate men. Even the Protestant daughters of the Catholic church have their priesthoods defined around their answers to their set of silly questions.

The true authority of the writings is the Word of God which they contain. The Word of God in the New Testament is there because it is in the Old Testament. It is the Old which gives it it's authority. Paul's 'novel' teaching was validated from the Old Testament by the Bereans.

1. Acts 12

Luke has hidden a story of Jesus in Acts 12. It meets the definition of sod (pronounced sowd) given by the rabbis: it is hidden in scripture and speaks of Messiah. [1]

Herod

To see the picture, you must connect ideas, not merely words. The verses associated with the ideas below (in the references) concerning Christ do not use the word 'vexed'. But when we read 'vexed' in Acts 12:1, if we meditate upon it, we realize that Jesus had been vexed by two different Herod's; once at the time of his birth, and once at his trial. Jesus said all the scriptures speak of him, so we always ask, "In what way does this speak of Christ?"

Herod vexed the body of Christ [2]

Herod had vexed Christ. [3] [4]

The arrest

Connecting the dots concerning the arrests takes more than looking for a common word. Peter was arrested during the "days of unleavened bread". The lazy expositor assumes that the day of unleavened bread are the 'feast of unleavened bread' which takes place after Passover, and the connection to Jesus will never be made. To ensure that we don't misunderstand, Luke tells us that Herod intended to display Peter to the crowds after Easter. [5] The DAYS of unleavened bread occurred before Passover when the Jews sold all their leavening to their non-Jewish neighbors so they could buy it back after Passover.

Peter was arrested the week before Passover [6]

Jesus was arrested the week before Passover. [7]

Two

We have been taught to compare and contrast things. In prophetic riddle, we only compare. Peter was placed between two guards, and Jesus between two thieves. If we get hung up contrasting them, we are distracted that guards and thieves are not alike. The comparison between the two is that in each case they were between two somethings.

Peter was set between two guards [8]

Jesus was set between two (thieves): [9]

Light

A light shown in the cell [10]

A light shown (in the tomb):[11]

Poked in the side

Peter was poked on the side [12]

Jesus was poked in the side: [13]

Three barriers

Three barriers to escape (two sets of guards and a gate) [14]

Three barriers to escape (two days in death and the stone which was opened on the third day):[15]

Self-opened

The gate open by itself [16]

The stone opened itself:[17]

Mary

Peter went to Mary's house [18]

The first person Jesus saw was Mary:[19]

Women ran to tell the disciples

The woman ran to tell the disciples [20]

Mary ran to tell the disciples [21]

Told she was crazy

She was told she was mad [22]

The woman was told she was crazy:[23]

Another place

When Peter was finished visiting his disciples he went to another place [24]

When Jesus finished visiting with his disciple he went to another place:[25]

>>15514445

—

1. Ps 40:7 Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book [it is] written of me," "Mashiach is the personification of secrecy (sod, which also means the hidden, inner dimension of the Torah and the mysteries of prophecy) - Breslov Center: Breslov Teachings About Mashiach"

1. Ac 12:1 ¶ Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth [his] hands to vex certain of the church.

1. Mt 2:13 ¶ And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.

1. Lu 23:11 And Herod with his men of war set him at nought, and mocked [him], and arrayed him in a gorgeous robe, and sent him again to Pilate.

1. Ac 12:4 … intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

1. Ac 12:3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)

1. Mt 26:2 Ye know that after two days is [the feast of] the passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.

1. Ac 12:6 And when Herod would have brought him forth, the same night Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains: and the keepers before the door kept the prison.

1. Mt 27:38 Then were there two thieves crucified with him, one on the right hand, and another on the left.

1. Ac 12:7 And, behold, the angel of the Lord came upon [him], and a light shined in the prison: …

1. Mt 27:60 And laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock: and he rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed.

1. Ac 12:7…and he smote Peter on the side, and raised him up, saying, Arise up quickly. And his chains fell off from [his] hands.

1. Joh 19:34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.

1. Ac 12:10 When they were past the first and the second ward, they came unto the iron gate that leadeth unto the city;

1. Mt 17:23 And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again. And they were exceeding sorry.

1. Ac 12:10…which opened to them of his own accord: and they went out, and passed on through one street; and forthwith the angel departed from him.

1. Lu 24:2 And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.

1. Ac 12:12 And when he had considered [the thing], he came to the house of Mary the mother of John, whose surname was Mark; where many were gathered together praying.

1. Mt 28:1 ¶ In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first [day] of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. Mt 28:8 And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word.

1. Ac 12:14 And when she knew Peter’s voice, she opened not the gate for gladness, but ran in, and told how Peter stood before the gate.

1. Mt 28:8 And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word.

1. Ac 12:15 And they said unto her, Thou art mad. But she constantly affirmed that it was even so. Then said they, It is his angel.

1. Lu 24:11 And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not.

1. Ac 12:17 But he, beckoning unto them with the hand to hold their peace, declared unto them how the Lord had brought him out of the prison. And he said, Go shew these things unto James, and to the brethren. And he departed, and went into another place.

1. Lu 24:51 And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven.

1. Luke wrote Acts 12 in the same manner as he observed in many places in the Old Testament. Observe Ge 38

3 And she conceived, and bare a son; and he called his name Er.

4 And she conceived again, and bare a son; and she called his name Onan.

5 And she yet again conceived, and bare a son; and called his name Shelah: and he was at Chezib, when she bare him.

God had three sons: Adam, Israel, and Joseph; husband of Mary.

This may look like free-for-all allegory until we dig using notarikon and other rules and methods of sensus plenior.

How does Er become Adam in symbols?

'Er' means 'awake'. Now let's play word games. The opposite of awake is asleep. 'Asleep' is a euphemism for being dead. If you are dead you can be said to be returning to the dust. Er was called awake; therefore he was called 'alive from the dust, as was Adam.

The rule says that we need two witnesses. What else is known about Er?

Ge 38:7 And Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him.

Er was died because of sin. Why did Adam die? Because of sin.

With two evidences derived from the words and text it can be said with confidence that Er represents Adam.

1. Ge 38 Onan

Onan represents Israel. Israel is called the son of God [1] Isreal was supposed to be a spiritual son of God. He met them at the mountain and they covenanted with God.

But they did not believe God, and the whole generation died in the wilderness. They were an earthly people, and earthly seed.

Onan was named by his mother. This suggests that his name did not fit him for the woman (representing the church) was deceived. [2]

His name means 'vigorous' but he was not full of life. He fathered no children having spilled his seed in the earth.

With these evidences, it is not an invention to say that Onan represents Israel in the prophetic prophecy.

1. Ex 4:23 And I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, [even] thy firstborn.

1. 1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

1. Gen 38 Shelah

The three sons of Judah, Er Onan and Shelah, represent Adam, Israel and Joseph, the husband of Mary.

Shelah was named by his mother, and like Onan, the meaning of his name does not apply to him.

Shelah ("petition") was at Chezib ("false") meaning a "false petition".

Shelah, like Joseph, was in line to bear the child of promise, but did not get a chance. Instead, Judah, his father sired the son, as God did for Joseph.

1. "G3 38:17 Judgement immanent"

Ge 38:12 ¶ And in process of time the daughter of Shuah Judah’s wife died; and Judah was comforted, and went up unto his sheepshearers to Timnath, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite.

'Judah' means 'praised' and he is the father. He represents God.

Judah took the Adulamite ('justice of the people' ) with him. Justice is a two-edged sword, giving recompense. The Holy Spirit is prepared to display Holiness.

They went to Timnath, meaning "apointment". Christ had an appointed time. They went to the appointed time. They went to meet those who would 'cut off' the sheep; the sheepshearers.

Observe that 'shear' גז, though having the meaning 'cut off' as a symbol of judgement, Judah will not reach Timnath, nor will he shear the sheep. The notarikon meaning is "pursue ג the bride ז."

1. Ge 38:13 Tamar

Ge 38:13 And it was told Tamar, saying, Behold thy father in law goeth up to Timnath to shear his sheep.

Observe that Tamar and Mary (Marion) share the Hebrew gate (two-letter sub-root) of 'mar' מר meaning 'bitterness, myrhh and death'.

Tamar will symbolize Mary in the story and have many other parallels.

The widow and virgin are part of the same theme of the world being desolate. Desolation symbolizes being without the water/Word, or being without Christ.

1. Ge 38 Mary and Tamar

Tamar met Judah before Timnath (the appointment) [1]

Mary met God before the appointed time of Christ. “It is appointed unto man once to die…” [2]

Tamar was offered a goat by Judah. [3]

Mary was offered THE scapegoat, since the angel told her “He will save his people from their sins.” [4] The scapegoat would carry away the sins of the people. [5]

Judah told Tamar he would send a goat. The word he used for 'end' also means ‘sow’. [6](

God told Mary she would conceive miraculously by the Holy Ghost. God would 'sow' the goat. [7]

Tamar wanted an assurance that she would receive the goat,[8]

Mary asked for an assuring word of explanation [9]

They each got three things:

Tamar was given the staff or rod which represents the power of God in discipline. [10] [11] [12] [13]

Mary was told the power of the Highest would overshadow her. [14]

Tamar was given the signet ring. [15] A signet ring declares the wearer to be a son.

Mary was told that he would be called the Son of God. [16]

Tamar was given bracelets. [17] In a very literal sense, bracelets were given to signify a marriage, much like we now give rings. But the real clue to the hidden meaning comes from the law of cleanliness: Nu 19:15 And every open vessel, which hath no covering [bracelets] bound upon it, is unclean. Tamar was not unclean.

Mary was told that she was not unclean because although she was with child, it was by the Holy Ghost. [18]

Tamar, when discovered to be with child was threatened. [19]

Mary was discovered with child and was going to be put away. [20]

When the father was discovered, Tamar was honored [21]

Then the Father was discovered, mary was honored. [22]

Tamar bore twins [23]

Mary bore the dual-natured God-man

The names of the twins mean 'breaking forth' and 'rising sun'

Jesus was called Dayspring. [24]

The image of Tamar’s twin sons would be incomplete if the second son did not get the inheritance, and sure enough, they wrestle in the womb, and the second son emerges first and receives pre-eminence. [25]

In the flesh Jesus died desolate. As God’s only begotten son, he did not succeed in being fruitful and multiplying. Only in his resurrection, as the mystery second son, did he receive the full blessing and inheritance given to Abraham. [26] The teaching that Jesus is the second Adam is one of the recapitulations of the prophecy. [27]

There are many more details concerning Christ is Ge 38 which can be observed because of the details that Matthew, Luke and Paul recorded for us about Jesus. Genesis 38 has been called the worst chapter of the Bible, but only by those who cannot see the mystery hidden within.

—

1. Ge 38:14

1. Heb 9:27

1. Ge 38:17

1. Mt 1:21

1. Le 16

1. Ge 38:17

1. Lk 1:35

1. Ge 38:17

1. Lk 1:34

1. Ge 38:18

1. Pr 22:15

1. Pr 23:13

1. Pr 29:15

1. Lk 1:35

1. Ge 38:18

1. Lk 1:35

1. Ge 38:18

1. Lk 1:35

1. Ge 38:24

1. Mt 1:18-19

1. Ge 38:26

1. Lk 1:42

1. Ge 38:27

1. Lu 1:78

1. Ge 38:28-29

1. Ge 12:2

1. 1Co 15:47

1. Recapitualation

The Greek church did not wish to be Jewish and by 400 AD had cleansed itself of believing Jews and anything that looked Hebraic, including the original Hebrew OT texts. They did not carry forth the "marriage supper of the Lamb" which was the explosion of doctrine that took place as the mystery; hidden from the beginning, was revealed.

What is shown here are morsels from the banquet. Through a restored Notarikon, the mystery can be unpacked. Those who have read the whole Old Testament literally have only read half of the Bible.

No debates

For this reason it makes no sense to debate Greek scholars or wanna-be scholars. They do not have access to the mystery and based their doctrine on opinions formed using incomplete information. They also generate discrepancies and debates with their incomplete information. Many of the debates are silly arguments, many can be resolved by the additional information contained in the mystery. Motivation for the arguments is to win adherents which can support and be manipulated by the Nicolaitans.

There is a teaching about the invisible Father, and the Son who reveals him through his works, words, life, death, resurrection and indwelling Spirit which is proper doctrine. It leaves few debates and leads one to love God and his neighbor.

The Dinner theater

The history from Adam and through Jesus is a dinner theater play. Though a true history, is a dinner theater to teach of the invisible Father.

Next

A revealed Catechism has been displayed from the alphabet, as well as demonstrations that the New Testament authors were aware of the Notarikon and sensus plenior. The NT is a commentary (Gospels, Hebrews) and a praxis (letters) based on the OT scriptures . There is no new doctrine in the New Testament that isn't found hidden in the mystery of the Old.

1. A few parables will be examined to show that they too, speak of the cross.

2. A few miracles will be examined to show that Jesus communicated with the invisible Father through the miracles.

3. A correlation will be made between the revealed doctrine and the question of how do we now live.

4. Questions from skeptics will be answered.

This is the intended course, Should we deviate, we will be brought back by this intention.

>>15534983

don't click that. possible CP "lolita"

>>15535754

Thank you BO or BV for quick response.

Have you studied IS 19:19-20 using this method?

>>15536647

I have not focused in detail on it.

If I were to dig on it:

1. There are about 40 places where Isaiah says "In that day". They need to be placed on top of each other like transparencies.

2. Of the four voices: prophet, judge, priest, king, the voice of the prophet is the easiest to see.

3. Flag those symbols that are known to speak of the cross.

4. Divide the book into pericopes.

5. Then dig into the notarikon to see the details.

We can shortcut a bit.

The pericope is Is 19:19-22 here are hints of the cross.

19 In that day shall there be an altar [cross] to the LORD in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to the LORD.

20 And it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto the LORD of hosts in the land of Egypt: for they shall cry unto the LORD because of the oppressors, and he shall send them a saviour, and a great one, and he shall deliver them.

1. Mustard seed

Mt 13:31 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:

Mt 13:32 Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.

Mt 17:20 And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

Mr 4:30 And he said, Whereunto shall we liken the kingdom of God? or with what comparison shall we compare it?

Mr 4:31 [It is] like a grain of mustard seed, which, when it is sown in the earth, is less than all the seeds that be in the earth:

Mr 4:32 But when it is sown, it groweth up, and becometh greater than all herbs, and shooteth out great branches; so that the fowls of the air may lodge under the shadow of it.

Lu 13:18 ¶ Then said he, Unto what is the kingdom of God like? and whereunto shall I resemble it?

Lu 13:19 It is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and cast into his garden; and it grew, and waxed a great tree; and the fowls of the air lodged in the branches of it.

Lu 17:6 And the Lord said, If ye had faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye might say unto this sycamine tree, Be thou plucked up by the root, and be thou planted in the sea; and it should obey you.

1. Seed must die

'Seed' represents people or person. [1]

Corn [seed] represents Christ [2]

Seed of the woman is Christ [3]

Seed of the woman is the least of the seed because he served us all on the cross.

The Greek word for 'mustard' sounds like Hebrew 'bruised by anger'.

The seed of the woman had a bruised heel.

See above [119] for the bruised heel and Gethsemane.

1. Mt 22:24 Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.

1. Joh 12:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.

1. Ge 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

1. day

יום- creation י clarified or made distinct ו by the Son completing the promise or will or the Father ם.

Each day of creation in Gen 1 is a prophetic riddle of Christ.

This day too is a riddle of Christ.

When translating, there is not emphasis of THAT: In THAT day. The Hebrew simply says 'in day'.

However, since the rules say that a symbol is always the same thing, the day always speaks of the appointed time of Christ; the cross.

>>15543040

oops…>>15540623

>>15540623

'altar

מזבח - father's מ sacrifice זבח

It is in the death of Christ [altar], as in the sleep of Adam, that the bride ז is revealed to man ב and understood ח.

As Christ hung on the cross, water and blood gushed זב from his side to give us life ח.

Heb 9:19 For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people,

1Jo 5:6 This is he that came by water and blood, [even] Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.

1Jo 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

>>15540623

there shall be יהיה can also be translated 'he shall be'.

Substituting known things, the paraphrase of the mystery becomes :

At the appointed time, he shall be the Father's sacrifice…

>>15540623

Egypt מצרים is actually 'Egyptians'. So the verse should be 'land of the Egyptians' where 'land' is the same word as 'earth' ארץ.

In Biblical dualism, there is heaven vs. earth and spirit vs. flesh. The Earth and flesh are not evil as in some religions. They were created good.

This time, 'Egypt' is built from letters:

ר - revelation, revealed

צ - exchange of sin for righteousness, the righteous one

מ- the father, the promise, from, silent

צר - foe, distress, constricted, narrow, flint-knife, forms, preserve, rock, tie you up, agent

מצ - squeezing

מר - bitter, myrrh, death

Egypt is a symbol for the earth; here it is even identified as the 'earth' ארץ of Egyptians.

God called Israel his son, and compares Egypt as the son of Pharaoh. This participates in the second son theme. The first son loses his inheritance and the second son gains it.

Since the events of Egypt have already happened, it is used here as a metaphor, like Waterloo. Since it also speaks of the cross, the events in Egypt also speak of the cross as a 'dinner theater'.

At Egypt, Moses was a symbol of the righteous one. He too participated in the second son theme being both the first and second son; before and after the burning bush.

Looking at Egypt, in the midst of bitterness מ()ר the sins of the people were exchanged for God's righteousness. It was a great day, because of the exchange, but a terrible day because of the great death. Pharaoh also represents Christ before the cross. Jesus died unfruitful and alone, having lost everything. Israel is the fruitfulness of his death, representing the church.

Play with the letters and two-letter gates to see what else is hidden in the word about the experience at Egypt.

>>15542957

1. Great herb

Ps 104:14 He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth;

Since eating is a metaphor for learning, the herb is Christ as the great teacher. What is the greatest thing to eat (or learn)? The body of Christ… the cross.

The grass will be important later.

herb עשב - the flesh ע returns to God with Christ ש by the revelation to man ב

>>15547561

1. Tree. עץ

The tree is the 'flesh ע of the righteous man in death ץ'. It is the cross. Every tree in the Bible is a symbol of the cross.

Christ as the seed of the woman grew to be the great teacher, then died on the cross.

>>15547874

1. Birds We'll come back to birds for proofs… suffice it for now to say that those who live in in the spirit (fly in the air) rest in the cross.

>>15550131

1. Move the mountain to the sea

The word for water is mayim מים. The first mem מ represents the Father, the second mem ם represents the Son.

Jesus told the woman at Sychar that she worshiped on the mountain but would soon worship in Spirit and Truth. [1]

The Father is Spirit and the Son is Truth. She would move the mountain to the water.

1. Joh 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.

Your Canaanite programing is known.

>>15551563

Once again you miss your mark by not having read a thing and you still have no sauce.

You copy paste a half truth. Most of the time recorded in the history of the Old Testament, the Jews did not worship one God, but the polytheistic Gods of Canaan. So the arrow from Canaan to Hebrew Judaism is true.

Your ignorance of the Bible is then displayed with an arrow from Hebrew Judaism to Christianity.

Have you not read of the 400 years of silence, when God, being tired of the idolatry of Israel divorced her? Did you not discern the difference of what God was teaching and what they were practicing?

The leaders of Hebrew Judaism set up the synagogue system in hopes that the one God would return. They put a hedge around the law trying to live in a worthy fashion so that he would return. But he never inhabited the temple with his Shekina glory again.

At the time of Christ there was a teaching about one God, but they had no relation with him because they were still divorced from him.

Christianity began with the cross of Christ and rejected the religion of the religious leaders of Hebrew Judaism.

It went back to the religion of Adam. It showed the error of Hebrew Judaism through the ages. It taught what was hidden to them in prophetic riddle.

Now this is where your chart has the largest error. There is no pre-history. As mentioned previously, the evidence shows that Gen 2 was written by Adam; an eye witness to the events. See P.J. Wiseman.

These posts demonstrate that Hebrew is the language that God used to reveal himself in a verifiable way; removing silly Greek debates.

In the face of the evidence, you can merely copy-paste and pathetically parrot. To what end? To deny the one true God and elevate yourself as a god, usurping God's position to declare good and evil for yourself.

The next error of your chart, as mentioned previously, is that these posts have little to do with Catholicism, nor modern variants. You cannot find these teachings in their writings. So you are just lazy as you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions as you ignore what is actually written here.

By adopting an origin as being 'Pre-historic Polytheism' you demonstrate your own pagan religion.

Genesis 1 demonstrates that Hebrew is the language of God while the rest of Genesis was surreptitiously written by the Father with a theme of "Look at my Son. Sure there is sin, but he has it covered." The history of Israel is written by the Son with a theme of "My Father gave me a bride but she is a prostitute…"

This is the religion of a faithless people which was rejected in practice by the people keeping the record! What possible motivation would drive that dynamic?

The New Testament was written by the Holy Ghost to say "The bridegroom cometh" and "See him now be fruitful and multiplying".

So you do not even include this teaching on the chart, and there is no arrow from anything on your chart to this teaching.

This teaching speaks of the "mystery hidden from the beginning" which was revealed at the time of the resurrection of Christ in the 'marriage supper of the Lamb', and then buried by the Catholic church.

One thing common to all the religions listed: They all reject the God of the Bible as taught in the mystery hidden in the Old Testament which Jesus said spoke of him. As people are taught by God, they do not become religious; they become the bride.

1. The Dishonest Steward

(Lk 16:1-12)

Lu 16:1 ¶ And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.

Lu 16:2 And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward.

Lu 16:3 Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed.

Lu 16:4 I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses.

Lu 16:5 So he called every one of his lord’s debtors [unto him], and said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord?

Lu 16:6 And he said, An hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty.

Lu 16:7 Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore.

Lu 16:8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.

Lu 16:9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

Lu 16:10 He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much.

Lu 16:11 If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true [riches]?

Lu 16:12 And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man’s, who shall give you that which is your own?

∞ The parable of the unjust servant is troubling because normally moral imperative is sought. Perhaps that is not what is being taught at all.

Using the methods described in other questions called 'sensus plenior' let's see how this parable might be unpacked.

>>15554313

1. The keys to the kingdom (teaching) are the pictures of the cross.

There are several suggestive points:

v2. The servant would no longer be a servant. Christ had come to serve and ceased to serve in the flesh on the cross.

v3. The Hebrew word for 'beg' כרה also means 'trade'. Jesus could not get relief from the cross by trade; he alone would suffice.

v3. The Hebrew word for dig שאל also means 'ask'. Jesus asked for the cup to be removed, but obtained no relief. He was figuratively ashamed of his work on earth (increase for God ש-אל( because he would die alone; unfruitful. This is the language of riddle and does not attribute literal shame to Christ in this matter.

4. v4. Only after his stewardship is ended (the cross) will they receive him into their houses; tabernacles.

1. After the event of the cross is identified in the riddle, look for things that happen before and after the cross. Before the cross:

v5. He asks the debtors to confess their debt. In close reading we would expect the bookkeeper to know what they owed. He is asking for a confession, just as Jesus taught them to repent.

1. Identify key elements in Hebrew translating back from the Greek:

Mammon - the believing ones.(1)

wisdom - From ancient times it has been understood that wisdom was hidden in riddle. Ezekiek equates riddles and parables. [1] and God says that the literal history would be a parable. [2] THe proverb also connects wisdom to understanding riddles. [3]

generation - The word in Genesis for generation is toledoth תולדות which also means 'record' as in the written history.

1. Work out some riddles, synonyms, etc, so they become familiar.

unjust - we might say 'merciful' from the context, and it does not contradict unjust.

mammon of unrighteousness - the ones believing in unrighteousness, or the ones believing in grace; sinners.

the true - the righteous; there are none righteous.

1. Make a first pass at a restatement with Christ at the center.

v1. There was God who had a servant (Christ) who was accused of not being productive.

v2 "Give an account of your life, it will end soon."

v3 "I will die, I cannot trade the task. I cannot ask. I have no increase"

v4 "I am resolved to do what I must so that they will receive me after my death"

v5 He called everyone to repentance and asked for confessions.

v8 God commended his merciful servant because he had hidden a riddle (wisdom) in his literal history. For the children of the world write the wisdom of God with their literal histories as parables. The children of holiness speak plainly.

Now fill in the gaps with deeper digging:

100 - the church. By taking 'half' they are joined 50-50 like a marriage. It is a symbol of taking the church as his bride.

80-20 - When Joseph stored grain to save the people of the earth, he took 20%. This is a picture of the servant becoming the savior.

The last of the parable is an admonition to Jesus himself. If he is not faithful to the sinners, he will have no reward since there are no righteous.

The last line is silly if read literally. Everyone will give you your own. But Jesus must be faithful to the enemies of God, in order for them to become his own.

(1) See Deut 1:32, and Is 28:16 . You cannot serve God and self.

1. Eze 17:2 Son of man, put forth a riddle, and speak a parable unto the house of Israel;

1. De 28:37 And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb [parable], and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee.

1. Pr 1:6 To understand a proverb, and the interpretation; the words of the wise, and their dark sayings. [{the interpretation: or, an eloquent speech }]

1. Parable of the sower

Hidden wisdom

Questions

Seed

1. Jesus is the seed of the woman (Ge 3:15) This is a prophecy of the Son of Man as the seed.

2. The seed 'zerah' זרע is the sower 'zara' זרע (the words are the same). The Son of God is the sower.

3. "Sowed" זרעתם is the "fulfilled" 'final mem' ם "arms" 'zerowa' זרעת of the seed 'zerah' זרע or "the work (arms) of Christ (the seed)"

Places/times

The work of Christ has taken place in four places and/or times, mapping to the four voices of God.

4a. (King) Path outside of the garden. Man was left to know God by the testimony of the Son through general revelation (the creation). (Rom 1:18ff)

4b. (Judge) Stony place. The stone is Christ (Eph 2:20) as the Word of God revealed through the Torah (law). He is the chief cornerstone. The other stones are Israel which built the temple.

4c. (Prophet) Jesus said the thorns were the cares of the world. Jesus was revealed to the world he cared for, in the flesh, and they killed him.

4d. (Priest) Good ground/earth. Christ made his bride 'good' through his death and resurrection, and they are fruitful in resurrection.

Misc.

4a. Birds

There are two kinds of birds:

Seed eaters: צפר tsippore like a sparrow and used in sacrifices.

Flesh eaters: עוף ofe (Ge 40:19 )

Men ate the seed of the Word. The seed had not yet become flesh. This is the same teaching that Adam could not eat of the tree of Life after the fall, that God spoke in riddles so that they would not hear, and Jesus spoke in parables so they would not understand. They could not be made complete without the cross.

4b. In the stony place. The sun and the Day represent the Holiness of God. No sooner had God pulled Israel out of Egypt, and they complained about being scorched, without water. They all died, save two, in the desert having rejected God's holiness. God's word did not abide (take root) in their hearts.

4c. Like the ram that substituted for Isaac, Jesus died because he was ensnared by his care for the world. (Joh 3:16)

The word for choke/strangle חנק is the same as for hang חנק. Jesus died by being hung on a cross.

4d. Fruit of the spirit

100 = the church

60 = three testimonies in heaven and three on earth (6) of Christ (10)

30 = God's (3) testimony of Christ (10)

>>15558205

Retelling the mystery

Mt 13:1 ¶ The same day went Jesus out of the house, and sat by the sea side.

On this day, Jesus spoke from the land (earthly) and from the sea (spiritual). He spoke of earthly things and spiritual things. First of earthly things: in chapter 12, he had rebuked the Pharisees who had challenged him. Then in spiritual things: he went to the sea to speak as the Living Water. The parables he told in chapter 13, all speak of him.

Mt 13:2 And great multitudes were gathered together unto him, so that he went into a ship, and sat; and the whole multitude stood on the shore.

Ship אניה is the same word as sorrow אניה .

Shore שפה also means brink שפה

The parables that he told speak of his own death. It brought him sorrow whenever he was faced with the prospect of the cross. Sitting in the boat was a sign of his sorrow. The people stood, in the same fashion that they would when they later cried "Crucify him!" and as they did at the cross. The people stood on the shore… on the brink between condemnation and justification. If Jesus had chosen not to die on the cross, they would be condemned.

Mt 13:3 And he spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow;

Hidden in the parable was ancient wisdom:

Ps 78:2 I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings [riddles] of old:

The Son of God went forth to reveal himself to man.

Mt 13:4 And when he sowed, some [seeds] fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

He revealed himself through the things that are made (Ro 1.18ff) and those who would be saved ate what they could of the Word, but the seed was not mature, so they did not receive his body of flesh. These are those who looked for a city not made with hands.

Mt 13:5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth:

Then he revealed himself to Israel and led them out of Egypt. And they rejoiced at being set free from Egypt.

Mt 13:6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

But their love for God withered in the heat of the desert as the holiness of God was revealed. They had loved God merely for rescuing them, but they did not know him as their God.

Mt 13:7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

Then he revealed himself in the flesh among the people he cared for. And they rose up and killed him.

Mt 13:8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold.

Finally, he revealed himself in resurrection, and brought his purified bride with him. Together they were fruitful. Together they testified as the church, as God's spiritual and earthly testimony, and as the testimony of God himself.

1. Kensosis - the emptying

Php 2:7 But made himself of no reputation [kenoo], and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

kenosis - AV-make void 2, make of none effect 1, make of no reputation 1, be in vain 1; 'empty'

The Catholic church and some Protestant churches hold that the doctrine of kenosis 'the emptying' is a heresy. They acknowledge that Jesus was fully God and fully man, and that the two natures were never separate.Some say that the two natures are not two natures, but they are so inseparable that they are one nature.

Because of this, myths of magic baby Jesus persist. Though they formally deny the myths, people still talk of them as if they were possible: Jesus flying and making clay birds come alive.

There are some groups who argue that the natures are so separate, that Jesus was just a man with a Christ consciousness. This leads to speculations of the consciousness falling on other men.

The nun נ and kof כ clarify the doctrine. In the square text, the upper horizontal ar heavenly of spiritual things we can know, the lower is earthly or fleshly things. The kof כ has full length horizontals. As the Son of God [which title is referred to by the kof כ], he was fully God and fully man. The nun [referring to the Son of Man title]has shortened horizontals representing that he was partially God and partially man. These are not contradictions.

The kof refers to his nature, and the nun refers to his choice. By nature he was fully God and fully man, by choice he closed his eyes to his divinity and did not live fully as a man, choosing no wife, nor career.

When you choose to close your eyes, you do not become blind, you simply choose to not see. Jesus chose to not use his divinity as he resisted the same temptations we have. If he had used his divinity to resist temptation, he would forfeit being qualified to be out high priest. [1]

Since he chose not to use his omniscience, he had to learn who he was and what he was to do from the mystery hidden in the OT that we are now reading.

—

1. Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as [we are, yet] without sin.

>>15560079

Don't click that .. probable Child porn "lolita pics"

1. When did Jesus know he was God? The baby or child?

As a baby, Jesus knew what babies know. There is no reason to believe that Jesus did not cry, nor wake his parents in the night.

Having closed his eyes to his deity, he was a normal human child. The nature of a child is that like Eve's. She desired to live by instinct. The baby lived by instinct. He put himself first. He demanded of his parents. He measured the universe with him at the center. Just like you and I did.

This is not Adam's sin; it is Eve's transgression. She was deceived. [1]

You and I were deceived by the flesh, by the carnal mind, by the instinct, to think of ourselves as God and be the measure of all things.

But Jesus was not deceived. He was God! He had every right to demand attention and to measure the universe with him at the center.

Though we were deceived and in transgression, we did not deserve death. Eve's transgression did not bring death. The sin of Adam did. [2]

The church teaches that we all are punished for Adam's sin. This produces one of the most pernicious doctrines the church has ever invented. Theologians decided that babies in the womb and children under the age of accountability were given a pass on Adam's sin because they had no awareness of their sin.

This is purported to display God's wonderful grace. But consider the child who dies moments after becoming aware of his sin, but has not yet heard the gospel message. According to the doctrine, since he has reached the age of accountability he will spend eternity in hell.

This is not so!!

Elohim!!! God separated from man by ignorance. Israel - man joined to God by revelation. God is not waiting for every theological hole in the doctrines of men, to destroy those whom he created and loves. God's purpose is to teach.

Adam was not punished with death, he was instructed in holiness and grace by it. He did not die the day he ate the fruit because a symbol of Christ died in his place; the Lamb of God. He did die the day he ate the fruit because all seven days representing all of time occur in one day. The death we experience is not a true death. It too is a 'dinner theater' death. We leave the stage to be with Christ. He died the day he ate the fruit with the Lamb of God in the same manner that we died in Christ on the cross.

—-

1. 1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

1. Ro 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

1. As a youth?

When Jesus was 12 and preparing for his Bar Mitzvah He knew that he was the son of God, and he had learned that from his parents.

He did not yet realize the implication of that. The event in the temple is the fulfillment of the prophetic riddle found in Genesis 14. The riddle speaks of Jesus coming of age and wrestling flesh against spirit. His spirit won as he declared that he must be about his Father business.

Manessah was 12 when he reigned and when he returned to Jerusalem, he knew he was God.

After teaching in the temple, Jesus would return to Jerusalem when he began his ministry. He then had realized that he was God incarnate. At the wedding at Cana he wrestled whether to save Israel or judge it.

1. When he returned

It was almost time for the wedding supper of the lamb and the leaders of the feast had no grace (wine). Jesus asked for water (the word) which contains judgement and grace. He is the Word and could rightly choose to give either.

As Elisha removed the axe from the stream, Jesus removed judgement from his own heart and chose to be savior.

Prior to the wedding he said it was not his time. After removing judgement from the word, he began his ministry. Though he knew he was God, and went to claim his temple, he did not yet fully realize the requirement that he die.

>>15565101

>Manessah was 12 when he reigned and when he returned to Jerusalem, he knew he was God.

That is in the riddle.

1. 'Talking with the Father

Before Jesus 'returned to Jerusalem' he was beginning to believe that he was God incarnate, but without using omniscience, how could he be sure he wasn't delusional?

As he stepped into the circumstances surrounding the wedding at Cana he saw the dinner theater arranged by the Father.

The rulers of the feast were without grace, as the rulers of Israel were without grace.

The wedding symbolized the Wedding of the Lamb where he would obtain his bride (those taught by him) and where he would be revealed as the Messiah.

Knowing that at the cross he would remove judgement from the word, and the symbols he discovered in the Old Testament, he stepped forward in faith to turn water into wine.

The Father performed the miracle, as he had done for the prophets of old. For the prophets he did miracles to speak of the cross in the mystery, now he did them to encourage his Son to the cross.

Jesus said that he would only do one sign by his own power [1] which was his own resurrection. All the other signs were performed by the power of the Father.

We can say that he performed them the same way the prophets did. They did not have power themselves, but in faith stepped out as the Father did them.

Through the miracles the Father and Son had a dialog. The Father would arrange 'dinner theater' of teh cross as he had done throughout the Old Testament. The Son would recognize the story and step on stage to participate in it to say taht he understood that he was God incarnate who had closed his eyes to his divinity, and had to die. The Father then gave his stamp of approval with the miracle.

The miracles were not designed to get the people to follow Jesus. He had to die alone. He taught so that they would not believe; why would he do miracles so that they would? [2]

—-

1. Mt 12:39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:

1. Mt 13:13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and [their] ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with [their] eyes, and hear with [their] ears, and should understand with [their] heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

1. Zacheas

Lk 19:2 And, behold, [there was] a man named Zacchaeus, which was the chief among the publicans, and he was rich.

3 And he sought to see Jesus who he was; and could not for the press, because he was little of stature.

4 And he ran before, and climbed up into a sycomore tree to see him: for he was to pass that [way].

5 And when Jesus came to the place, he looked up, and saw him, and said unto him, Zacchaeus, make haste, and come down; for to day I must abide at thy house.

6 And he made haste, and came down, and received him joyfully.

7 And when they saw [it], they all murmured, saying, That he was gone to be guest with a man that is a sinner.

8 And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore [him] fourfold.

9 And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham.

10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.

Zacchaeus means 'pure' yet he was chief tax collector.

Who else do we know who was pure but bore our sin?

He climbs a tree. Jesus sees him as a symbol of himself on the cross. Why would he go to dinner with him?

According to the mystery, the marriage supper of the lamb occurs when Jesus comes off the cross and rises from the dead.

Jesus participated in the dinner theater nudged in position by the Father.

1. ¶ Leper

Mt 8. When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him.

2 And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean.

3 And Jesus put forth [his] hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed.

There is textual structure where the block starting in Ch 5 when he went up the mountain, now he comes down the mountain.

In Ch5 "Blessed are the poor in Spirit, and here he heals one who is poor in spirit.

There are many parallels in the two blocks which may be examined at a later time.

The Leper is a prophetic riddle of Christ. Leprosy represents sin.

The leper shaves his head. With hair representing authority, Jesus lost his on the cross as he cried "Why have you forsaken me?"

The leper is put outside the camp, as Christ would be on the cross.

The leper covers his lip, an action taken when your prayer is not answered. Jesus prayed "Remove this cup".

When the leper is completely covered with leprosy, he is declared clean. When Jesus has fully borne our sin, he rose holy.

The cleansed leper goes through a ceremony like ordaining a priest. Jesus, in his resurrection became our high priest.

Jesus saw himself in the leper. in faith he declared him to be clean demonstrating his faith that though he would bear the sins of mankind he would be restored to holiness. The Father encouraged him toward the cross by healing the leper.

1. Palsy

Mk 2:1 ¶ And again he entered into Capernaum after [some] days; and it was noised that he was in the house.

2 And straightway many were gathered together, insomuch that there was no room to receive [them], no, not so much as about the door: and he preached the word unto them.

3 And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four.

4 And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken [it] up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.

5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.

6 But there were certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts,

7 Why doth this [man] thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?

8 And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these things in your hearts?

9 Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, [Thy] sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?

10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)

11 I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way into thine house.

12 And immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went forth before them all; insomuch that they were all amazed, and glorified God, saying, We never saw it on this fashion.

Jesus saw the 'dinner theater' and participated in it.

The man was lowered from the roof. Jesus descended from heaven.

The man was disabled, unable to walk (symbol for life). The Word of God experienced his first separation (death) from the Father in his incarnation. He was figuratively dead compared to his previous glory as he closed his eyes to his divinity.

The man 'bore' sin since Jesus forgave him. Jesus bore our sin, but rose from the dead holy (forgiven).

In faith of his own resurrection he commands the man to walk. The father performed the miracle to encourage him toward the cross.

1. Blind

Mt 9:27 ¶ And when Jesus departed thence, two blind men followed him, crying, and saying, [Thou] Son of David, have mercy on us.

28 And when he was come into the house, the blind men came to him: and Jesus saith unto them, Believe ye that I am able to do this? They said unto him, Yea, Lord.

29 Then touched he their eyes, saying, According to your faith be it unto you.

30 And their eyes were opened; and Jesus straitly charged them, saying, See [that] no man know [it].

31 But they, when they were departed, spread abroad his fame in all that country.

Hearing represents being drawn to God. Sheep hear and recognize the voice of the shepherd but do not understand his words,

Seeing represents understanding.

Walking represents living the lifestyle.

Jesus saw himself in the dinner theater of he blind men. When he descended from heaven he gave up his omniscience… he chose not to use it. Testing his faith, he pronounces healing upon the blind men, to see that he might choose to regain his omniscience.

If he could make them see, then he himself could choose to see.

The Father worked the miracle to indicate to Jesus that his faith was sound.

1. Calming the sea

Mt 8:23 ¶ And when he was entered into a ship, his disciples followed him.

24 And, behold, there arose a great tempest in the sea, insomuch that the ship was covered with the waves: but he was asleep.

25 And his disciples came to [him], and awoke him, saying, Lord, save us: we perish.

26 And he saith unto them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith? Then he arose, and rebuked the winds and the sea; and there was a great calm.

27 But the men marvelled, saying, What manner of man is this, that even the winds and the sea obey him!

The Spirit communicates the Holiness of God while the Son communicates his love. This is prophesied in Genesis.

Ge 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Ge 1:6 ¶ And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

The Spirit stirs up the boundary between the waters above and those below. This is the symbol of God's judgement. the disciples are afraid of the storm and afraid of dying.

Jesus is represented by the firmament, and his Love calms the wrath of holiness.

>>15582959

Did you notice the symbol of the cross?

'Sleep' is a metaphor for death. Jesus was asleep in the ship. In his resurrection he made peace between heaven and earth.

Incredible the length you've gone to sell your corrupt, evil, perverted blood sacrifice enslavement system…your pattern of unfrequency and desperation shows you're unable to get it done. Try harder!

>>15585151

You are always missing your mark.

Pr 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him.

There is no enslavement to blood sacrifice.

Isa 1:11 To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats.

1Sa 15:22 And Samuel said, Hath the LORD [as great] delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey [is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams.

Most of the sacrifices were eaten by the priests and the one offering it. It is hypocrisy to think of the "terrible bloody sacrifices" while BBQing your steak. God was not pleased with the sacrifices because the opportunity of fellowship with God was tainted by their idolatry and disobedience.

The sacrifices were a giant BBQ to the Lord. And they were dinner theater. They taught about the cross, which was the culmination of God's revelation of himself.

Elohim - man separated from God by ignorance

Israel - man joined to God by revelation.

God's purpose is to teach who he is.

The carnal mind is war with God. [1] Your instincts deceive you into usurping God's position by declaring and defining good and evil for yourself.

The carnal mind, the flesh must die. The animal is killed and burnt up.

The burning represents the pain, and suffering caused by your carnal mind which God uses for good [2] to confront your carnal mind. You cannot be a god if you suffer; God's don't suffer.

The smoke rising from many of the sacrifices, representing your spirit (as you are in Christ) is a sweet savor to the Lord. The sacrifices were literally a Holy BBQ which teach about God. Your carnal mind must die to be in fellowship with God.

You eat your BBQ to merely satisfy your flesh. It is a bloody sacrifice to your personal deity.

As mentioned previously, the word 'mammon' is a Hebrew word meaning ' the believing ones'. You cannot serve God and self. The sacrifices were a fellowship meal with God. Your lonely personal sacrifices to the god made in your image avail nothing.

>sell …enslavement

If you think I am the target you have missed the mark again. There is no I here, we are anon. Nothing is sold; no church promoted. No demands are placed. This is merely sharing observations. Though much of it is shared quickly, without giving proofs, this is done to avoid tedious language studies.

There are two way to properly engage the material.

1. Collaborate and expand on the observations (avoiding opinion)

2. Challenge an observation using one of the rules.

I am irrelevant to the observations, so each of your posts addressing me are irrelevant to the material.

On the other hand, you and your ego are relevant to your posts. You are the center of them, since you offer no new material. Ad homminem attacks have no 'homm' [3] and so discredit you. You have decided the matter before hearing it out, and repeatedly missed your mark.

—

1. Ro 8:7 Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

1. Ro 8:28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.

1. LOL

1. Most reading this have noticed that the core doctrine is familiar.

One God in a Trinity of Father , Son and Holy Ghost.

There are differences.

The mystery emphasizes that God is teaching us who he is, where the churches emphasize a cat and mouse game of doing enough to get saved without doing anything because salvation is by grace.

Both teach that Jesus bore our sin. In the church it is not understood how. The mystery seams to suggest that he chose not to be offended and thereby absorbed sin as an expression of love .

The church sees Christ as a divine magician who manipulates creation at his will. The mystery suggests that though he was fully God, he had closed his eyes to his divinity and the miracles were a conversation between Father and Son.

The church see parables as moral teaching to help one live the law better. The mystery sees parables as hidden teachings of the cross to be revealed during the marriage supper of the lamb.

The church says this is a fallen world and doesn't understand why bad things happen to good people. The mystery seems to suggest that the world is a perfect insane asylum for people who think they are gods, reap what they sow, and cause pain suffering and death. God uses all these things for our good to lead us back to him.

The church sees the law as a moral imperative which is impossible to keep, giving God delight in expressing his holiness by punishing unrepentant sinners or passing over their sin if they have the right magic mantras and they are really sincere about it. The mystery sees the law as a confrontation of the instinctive nature of man, revealing that man is not God; enabling us to enter into a proper relationship with him. The church says they believe this, but sermons are focused on teaching you how to live the law better.

I have made some generalities about the church. There are, of course, exceptions.

1. The garden Ge 2:6

The skeptic claims there are two creation accounts by mis-identifying the start of this pericope. Verses 4 and 5 belong to the first creation account.

This account occurs in Day six of the first account. Mist is a symbol for general revelation it was the word everywhere. [1]

When tablets were related, the topic at the end of the first tablet was repeated in some way at the start of the second in order to indicate the order of the tablets.

The mist is a recapitulation of the topic of water in verse 5.

Mist אד is 'after God created א he gave a command'. The word 'grief' אדב happened when the command was revealed to man ב.

Watered also means 'to give drink' which is a symbol for teaching.

face פמי also means 'person'.

ground אדמה is also 'man אדם who doesn't understand ה.'

There went up a general teaching from the three testimonies (Spirit, water, blood) to teach all of the people of man who don't understand.

Ro 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them. [{in them: or, to them }] Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: [{so … : or, that they may be }]

1. 'Ge 2.7

Ge 2:7 And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. [{of the dust … : Heb. dust of the ground }]

Even without digging deeply A picture of Christ's resurrection can be seen.

'Formed' also means 'distressed' as in his tribulation. [1]

'Dust' - Without water/word. A symbol of kenosis and incarnation.

The man Adam/Christ was formed of the 'adamah'; the ground/grave.

And he became alive or rose from the dead.

Greeks like to debate when a person 'gets saved'. Here may be one indication that one comes alive when he receives the Spirit of God.

—

1. Heb 5:8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

>>15600777

>>15600783

>>15600785

This has nothing to do with this thread.

>>15601642

You say this because it doesn't follow the rules? It doesn't focus on Christ and the cross. It uses outside sources.

It also plays on a fear of death or the end times. What does this method teach of eschatology?

>>15602098

That's a good observation.

The Book of Revelation speaks of the cross using the metaphor of the Old Testament. It is not a literal book,

The popular eschatology is a modern invention funded by the Rothchilds through the Scofield Bible.

The Bible is not about the history of the world. It is about the Word revealing the Father. He said it was done at the cross.

Interpreting Revelation as a prophecy of the end of the world is a misapplication.

The Word came many times. In the parable of he sower, Jesus mentions four times. So asking about his second coming in the context of the end of the world is nonsensical.

1. Ge 8 Filthy time

Ge 2:8 ¶ And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.

'east' also means 'ancient' and 'before'.

'Eden' עדן - filthy עד time עדן

The garden was placed before filthy time. It was in a timeless eternity before the fall.

1. Ge 1:9 Two trees

Ge 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

We observe that when there are two things, they appear to be two sides of one thing. This observation started with the creation of the heavens and they earth. There is only one creation with two natures: spiritual and physical. In the first day there was light and dark. These represent two natures of God as Holy and Love. The waters above and below, represent the two layers of God's word, and the dual nature of men.

The two trees represent one tree: the cross. The cross is both the tree of life and the tree of death. In the Book of Revelation the two trees have grown together over the stream.

Adam and Eve had three choices of trees. 1. Eat the unnamed trees and remain as they were. 2. Eat of the tree of life and understand who God is through the story of the cross. 3. Eat of the tree of death and learn that they are not God through pain, suffering and death, before they can have eternal life with God through the reality of the cross.

The word 'know' ידע also means 'declare'. Declare is the better translation since Adam and Eve chose to make up their own rules. By choosing the eat/learn through the tree of death, they wanted to declare their own rules.

There was nothing magic in the tree of fruit. They were dinner theater to teach of God's holiness.

>>15610142

God gave them the choice to learn who he is the easy way, through instruction, or the hard way, through experience. They chose to learn by experience.

Had they eaten of the tree of life before the fall, it is probable that God would have used a parable of the cross.

1. Ge 2:10 Four rivers

Ge 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.

Water as the word of God was split into four 'heads' or authorities. I use the term 'voices'.

The Catholic church has a faint memory of this in the use of the term 'Quadriga'. They taught that the word has four layers of interpretation, though they could never exercise this belief well.

>>15611261

2Ti 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

It is given for four purposes.

Doctrine speaks of Christ in the flesh.

Reproof confronts your sin.

Correction makes things right through the high priest.

Training in righteousness helps discipline the goat or flesh of man.

1. Ge 2:15 the garden

Ge 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. [{the man: or, Adam }]

Here is a riddle:

The garden and the city have walls, where the field and the town do not.

The kingdom is equated with a city. [1]

The kingdom is also equated to 'leaven' [2] which is 'teaching'. [3]

'Dress and keep' are two things which are one. Man was to care for the teaching in the flesh and spirit.

1. Isa 19:2 And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother, and every one against his neighbour; city against city, [and] kingdom against kingdom. [{set: Heb. mingle }]

1. Mt 13:33 Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened. [{measures: the word in the Greek is a measure containing about a peck and a half, wanting a little more than a pint }]

1. Mt 16:12 Then understood they how that he bade [them] not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

1. Ge 2:17 Don't eat/learn

Ge 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. [{thou shalt surely … : Heb. dying thou shalt die }]

>>15612463

It all speaks of Jesus.

See a pre-incarnate conversation between the Father and Son here.

Do not learn of… evil. the day you do, you will die.

Christ bore our sins (learned of evil) and died.

1. Ge 2:18 a wife

Ge 2:18 ¶ And the LORD God said, [It is] not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. [{meet … : Heb. as before him }]

It is not good that Christ should be alone …

'help meet' עזר also means 'treasure'. There are two parables of something buried in the field. The pearl, a singular thing, and the treasure; a singular thing made of many parts.

'Buried' is a symbol of death. The church died with Christ.

עזר - flesh ע bride ז revealed ר.

>>15612463

My hope is that by giving you confidence that it all speaks of Jesus, and giving your permission to look for him, that you too can see him.

A lot can be seen in English, which the Notarikon can then validate.

The prophetic riddles are called wisdom. [1]

If you lack wisdom, ask God. [2]

Eph 1:17 That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him: [{in … : or, for the acknowledgement }]

1. Pr 1:6 To understand a proverb, and the interpretation; the words of the wise, and their dark sayings [riddles]. [{the interpretation: or, an eloquent speech }]

1. Jas 1:5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all [men] liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.