Kek. Let /pol/ deal with them.
>trannie/jannie detected.
>>15381561
60 years out of date. Tactics and techniques are adjusted constantly, and much never versions are available. You'd be better off with current version of Ranger Handbook and Special Forces Medical Handbook.
Joe can have my a/c when he pries it from my comfortably cool dead fingers.
>>15381613
All true, but if you expect to jiu-jitsu their current counter-insurgency tactics, you have to know what they are, not what was tried and failed in the Vietnam era. You need to study what was tried and failed in Iraq.
>>15381640
GTFO. You're encouraging morans to make themselves into targets for the Feds. Have the Oathkeepers taught you nothing?
I haven't read any reports of your heroic actions in the news yet, so I'm just going to classify you as a Walter Mitty military wannabe with delusions of relevance to the fight we're actually in.
Have a nice insurgency Fed.
Jim never takes his penis out at home…
Fuck off clown. You glow so hard you're the only one who doesn't see it.
NATO hasn't exactly been winning lately have they? Anon can see NATO dissolving in the near to mid-term future.
Their desperation is intensifying.
They can't be stupid enough to think they can depose Putin militarily. Not without the US and I can't see Potato Joe being able to drum up support from the public or Congress.
The only reason they're making muh democracy noises at Putin at all is that (they) + Germany don't have to worry about T-14's rolling over and through the Fulda Gap. They have the old Soviet satellite nations as a buffer zone. And therein lies the base problem.
The Russians won't give up any more of the old Warsaw Pact than they've already lost. They can't, from their perspective allow another Operation Barbarossa. So they need a buffer on their western border and that's what Ukraine is to them.
Putin's will is unbreakable. NATO's will can be broken with memes. Who is likely to win in that scenerio?
Kek. The absolute state of the Feds right now.