Did Princess Diana Know Things, or Just Wanted to Go Underground?
On Aug. 30, 1997, Princess Diana and her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, left Hôtel Ritz Paris after dinner to head to his apartment. They exited the rear of the hotel, trying to avoid the paparazzi, but they were waiting for them. The limousine that transported Princess Di and Dodi was operated by Henri Paul, who was traveling at a high rate of speed to try and escape the paparazzi. The Mercedes towncar eventually crashed into a pillar inside of a tunnel underneath the visually obstructed Alma bridge.
The official story is that the driver, who was also killed in the wreck, was at fault for the crash. Paul was impaired by drugs and alcohol and was driving at nearly twice the speed limit when he lost control of the car in a Paris tunnel. He was also the director of security at the Ritz.
Some conspiracy inquirers theorize that Paul was not only being paid by the Ritz but also French and/or British security services.
“Henri Paul, who was the driver of the car, was also the security manager at the Ritz Hotel and he was a MI6 informant,” former British MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson famously attested. “I saw his file.”
Tomlinson told reporters at the time, “It’s been well-established that he went missing for two or three hours the night of his death.”
A Series of Sketchy Particulars
At the top of our list of red flags is the standard protocol of doth-Protest-too-loudly methods of the Lugenpresse. There were enough questions to shake a stick at but, irregardless, the media used words like weird, bizarre and crazy to gaslight normal discussions that questioned the incident.
Other red flags:.
Three eyewitnesses at the scene of the crash claimed to see a bright flash of light before the accident.
Lack of CCTV evidence where there should be some is a raging warning to Winter Watch. According to The Independent newspaper in 2006, there were more than 14 CCTV cameras in the Pont de l’Alma underpass, though none recorded footage of the fatal collision. How is this even possible?
The Mercedes involved had only been purchased by the limo company two days earlier and had been in a serious car wreck earlier. Could this have been a Michael Hastings-style hit?
The first call to the emergency services’ switchboard was logged at 12.26 a.m. The SAMU ambulance carrying the princess didn’t arrive at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital until 2.06 a.m.
Diana was a faithful seat belt user, reports claimed. Analysis of the wreckage of the car after its repatriation to England in 2005 by a forensic accident investigator from the Transport Research Laboratory found that all the seat belts were in good working order except for the right rear one, which was attached to the seat Diana occupied. The verdict of a British inquest explicitly stated that the lack of seat belts had “caused or contributed to” the deaths of both Dodi and Diana.
Diana was embalmed before an autopsy could be performed and, therefore, her blood could not be tested.
Diana’s two sisters and Prince Charles were scheduled to view the body later that afternoon before bringing it back to the United Kingdom. French President Jacques Chirac and his wife also wished to pay their respects. But the hospital staff decided to press ahead with embalming with only verbal authority from one Madame Martine Monteil, the local superintendent of police, who assured the staff “that everything would be in order.”
https://www.winterwatch.net/2022/01/did-princess-diana-know-things-or-did-she-just-want-to-go-underground/