>Just Commscrewtards laying the groundwork for their op. Very easy to discern if you're paying attention. New influx of normies will fall for it. Despite what they're trying to make you believe, autists have not returned.
Enjoy it when the "Nu-Q" starts telling you to go against PDJT. I'll make sure to drop by and shout "I told you so" no fear, they will call it spam and delete it when I do.
>his spam is being deleted
>
>he's not getting a new board on 8 kun
>
>he's not gonna quit the meth
>
>we carry on
>his spam is being deleted
Can we have a clear definition of spam Mr. BV, that way i can stay within your parameters. It appears anything that points out you are all shills is currently considered spam.
>his spam is being deleted
Can we have a clear definition of spam Mr. BV, that way i can stay within your parameters. It appears anything that points out you are all shills is currently considered spam.
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
>his spam is being deleted
Can we have a clear definition of spam Mr. BV, that way i can stay within your parameters. It appears anything that points out you are all shills is currently considered spam.
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
For example, why deleted the rules of forums spies posts, how is giving anons information on how shills infiltrate, obfuscate and obliterate a board (like you are) considered spam?
>fuck you
Alex jones comment upset you, eh?
COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..
There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'
Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'
If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.
Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'
A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'
Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'
Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'
Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.
Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'
Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.
Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'
It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.
CONCLUSION
Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participantsDO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM.Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.
STILL NO ANSWER SO I WILL ASK AGAIN, I AM TRYING TO PLAY BUT YOUR RULES BDT CREW.
Can we have a clear definition of spam Mr. BV, that way i can stay within your parameters. It appears anything that points out you are all shills is currently considered spam.
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that the porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
For example, why deleted the rules of forums spies posts, how is giving anons information on how shills infiltrate, obfuscate and obliterate a board (like you are) considered spam?
Is every post that goes against your false rule of this board "SPAM"? Will you start deleting other anons when they start pointing out that only your crew can bake/collect notables, same as when you ruled the board before?
>Seethe. You do not need to know the staff's definition of spam. Why are you so desperate to know the inner workings?
OH SO ANONS AREN'T ALLOWED TO KNOW WHAT IS SPAM. BASICALLY ANYTHING THE SHILLS THAT TOOK OVER THE BOARD WANT TO CALL SPAM. GOTCHA. THANKS FOR SAYING IT.
STILL NO ANSWER SO I WILL ASK AGAIN, I AM TRYING TO PLAY BY YOUR RULES BDT CREW.
Can we have a clear definition of spam Mr. BV, that way i can stay within your parameters. It appears anything that points out you are all shills is currently considered spam.
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that the porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
Is every post that goes against your false rule of this board "SPAM"? Will you start deleting other anons when they start pointing out that only your crew can bake/collect notables, same as when you ruled the board before?
For example, why deleted the rules of forums spies posts, how is giving anons information on how shills infiltrate, obfuscate and obliterate a board (like you are) considered spam?
>FYI, oss free speech spam rules, just a refresher
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that the porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
>seems the definition of spam is (you)
Almost like I threaten them in some way. Like they know what happened last time. If you don't remember, in the beginning anons ignored me, until everyone could no longer deny the bakers union was comp'd, and then we booted all of them to boards that got 0 traffic. Yet, here they are again.
>Here is you as BV faggot
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that the porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
STILL NO ANSWER SO I WILL ASK AGAIN, I AM TRYING TO PLAY BY YOUR RULES BDT CREW.
Can we have a clear definition of spam Mr. BV, that way i can stay within your parameters. It appears anything that points out you are all shills is currently considered spam.
When I was BV spam was someone constantly shilling, posting the same stupid images 60+ times, or posting porn over and over, which has all mysteriously disappeared since your crew stole the board. Even more weird when you consider that the porn spam was the tranny porn we know Alex Jones loves.
For example, why deleted the rules of forums spies posts, how is giving anons information on how shills infiltrate, obfuscate and obliterate a board (like you are) considered spam?
Is every post that goes against your false rule of this board "SPAM"? Will you start deleting other anons when they start pointing out that only your crew can bake/collect notables, same as when you ruled the board before?
>filter.
> filter
> filter
> filter
> filter
> filter
>filtered
>FILTER
>filtered
Welcome to Not Q Research, where we discuss how to do the exact opposite of everything Q said. Such as, tripcodes, filtering, and never discussing anything Jew related
>OSS was right and the board management suppressed him
THAT WAS JUST THE FIRST ONE, THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU GIVE THE BOARD TO PEOPLE THAT HAVE ALREADY TRIED AND FAILED AT PLACING A BOMB THREAT. CAN'T BELIEVE ANONS DON'T SEE THIS COMING.
>Picks three letters at random out of all the BV in log, makes a label.
>
>Are you MSM?
I THINK YOU MEANT TO SAY THE FIRST THREE. WEIRD HOW IT HAPPENED ON THE 4 YEAR DELTA OF Q MENTIONING IT AS WELL. YOU JUST TRIED TO LIE BY OMISSION, ARE YOU MSM OR INFOWARS?
>The amount of attempted slides last night during PDJT's miraculous speech was epic. What a life when that's your focus during such an event
I didn't make a single post during the rally. my first post was as soon as it ended, as can be seen in this graphic. I would link the posts, but the BDT crew has deleted them, cause ya know, spam.
>panic is turned to 11
Yes, I agree, when the BO has to delete anything that shows shills have taken over management, that's definitely panic. I mean, let's think about it clearly, would an anon steal the board, or would nefarious actors steal the board? You would think this is day 1 shit for QR.
>Oh yeah, I forgot that a few weeks ago she was claiming the "attacks" on the board were coming from AJ and Infowars.
I DIDN'T CLAIM THAT, Q DID, THIS IS STILL Q RESEARCH ISN'T IT? HAVE YOU EVER READ THE Q DROPS?
Ask yourself a (simple) logical question…
Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?
Why are we a threat to them?
Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?
Why was this done in the past?
We knew this type of "attack" was coming.
PREDICTABLE.
FAKE NEWS.
ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY.
Q
>>Oh yeah, I forgot that a few weeks ago she was claiming the "attacks" on the board were coming from AJ and Infowars.
>
>I DIDN'T CLAIM THAT, Q DID, THIS IS STILL Q RESEARCH ISN'T IT? HAVE YOU EVER READ THE Q DROPS?
Follow the picture.
"Jerome Corsi who I outed as a Mossad asset/agent in a 1997 sting operation in London. Corsi and Piper Jaffray broker Brad Ahmundson were integral to a fraud that took Minnesota investors for $1 million that the FBI refused to properly investigate. Instead, agents sought to portray me as responsible. Corsi is named as the author of several best-selling Israeli psy-ops books, including Unfit for Command (2004), Atomic Iran (2005), Minutemen (2006), The Obama Nation (2008)."
Q
ALWAYS AD HOM ATTACKS. NEVER REAL ATTEMPTS TO REFUTE. VERY ANON-LIKE OF YOU.
SO WEIRD HOW THE NEW BOARD MANAGEMENT SEEMS TO HAVE ZERO KNOWLEDGE OF THE Q DROPS.