Anonymous ID: b94eda Jan. 16, 2022, 2:07 p.m. No.15392645   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3303

all pb

>>15391845

 

>Unhinged liberal!

 

Moar like UnhingedCommunist

 

>https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/letitia-a-james-1958/

 

James first ran to represent the 35th District of the New York City Council in 2001 but lost to James E. Davis. After the assassination of Davis in 2003, James defeated Democratic nominee Geoffrey David, brother of the late James Davis,''' running as amember of the Working Families Party.James won and became the first third-party candidate to be elected to the city council in over twenty-five years===. James spent most of her ten-year tenure in the Assembly working on the Atlantic Yards project, now The Barclays Center, Brooklyn’s largest housing development project in its history. The October 2006 fire at the historic Broken Angel House prompted James to sponsor two New York laws that focus on public housing code violations, and safety in child day care centers.

 

>https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/blumenthal-claims-ignorance-over-communist-event-video-says-otherwise/

 

Sen. Blumenthal claims he didn’t know event he spoke atwassponsored by communists– but video proves he’s lying

 

Posted by: Jim Patrick|December 19, 2021 |Categories Editorial, Featured

 

Yet here we have our entire Congressional delegation in the state, including its newest member Johanna Hayes, tied to the Communist Party of Connecticut. These are national security risks which should be investigated, but we know they will not.

 

It should also be noted that all of these 0fficials have been repeatedly endorsed bythe Working Families Party, an __offshoot of the Communist Party US__A.

 

As Loudon notes, all of these representatives would have to submit to an FBI background check were they applying for low-level federal jobs; luckily for them no such requirement is necessary for members of the House or Senate.

 

>https://www.cpusa.org/party_voices/convention-discussion-fighting-the-right-danger-in-a-blue-state/

 

The Working Families Party

 

New York has a long history of fusion politics – allowing smaller parties to cross-endorse major party candidates, avoiding the spoiler dilemma. The Working Families Party has engaged in this process for the last 15 years or so, chalking up some significant victories that have helped change the political landscape in the state, including the recent election of NYC mayor Bill DeBlasio. The WFP endorsement is increasingly a requirement for a candidate to prove their progressive credentials and has been the margin of victory in some elections. WFP is not just a ballot line, but is a coalition of unions, community organizations and activists engaged in grass-roots work on issues most notably paid sick leave, living/minimum wage and electoral finance reform. These campaigns “move the masses” into action, turn the heat up on politicians and lay the basis for the election battles, both primary and general, that will determine the balance of power in State and local government.

 

What are the prospects for the WFP? It’s hard to say. As the WFP influence has grown into “the most effective political operation the American left has seen in decades” (American Prospect, Meyerson, 1/6/14), it has drawn more fire from New York’s ruling interests. The upcoming elections will prove an important challenge: recent polls show a WFP gubernatorial candidate trailing Governor Cuomo by only 15% and even with a GOP candidate. Still, Cuomo will be elected Governor. Key questions include: would a WFP candidate who denied Cuomo a significant margin of victory move him to the left or right? Would allowing him to run on the WFP line mean that he would be influenced by progressive forces, or not? What about the State Senate? What scenario offers the most promise for winning it? No one can pretend these are easy questions and there are many different views within the broad anti-right coalition.

 

PB

 

>>15389523 notes from rally and letita james digz request into law firms and rise to power.

Anonymous ID: b94eda Jan. 16, 2022, 2:20 p.m. No.15392716   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2839

>>15392707

Weather reports on the night of the crash July 16, 1999 cited haze or mist and visibility as low as four miles. Pilots who flew over the Cape Cod-Martha's Vineyard area that night reported serious haze; one told investigators he had flown over Martha's Vineyard and thought there was a power failure on the island, because he could not see any lights.

The report said that investigators had interviewed one of Mr. Kennedy's flight instructors, who said he would not have felt comfortable with Mr. Kennedy conducting night flight operations on a route similar to the one flown on, and in weather conditions similar to those that existed on, the night of the accident.

Anonymous ID: b94eda Jan. 16, 2022, 3:28 p.m. No.15393176   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3181 >>3192 >>3200 >>3303

>>15393026

>THE ONLY FUCKING THING ANONS SHOULD BE FOCUSED ON IS PROVIDING INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT POTUS ORDERED 10,0000 TROOPS TO PROTECT THE COCK SUCKING MOTHER FUCKING CAPITAL

sounds like a good project.

let's find some sauce

 

Trump Offered to Deploy 10,000 National Guard Troops in DC Ahead of Jan. 6: Mark Meadows

By Isabel van Brugen

February 9, 2021 Updated: February 11, 2021

>https://archive.ph/dpAw5#selection-1017.0-1037.26

Anonymous ID: b94eda Jan. 16, 2022, 3:32 p.m. No.15393192   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3228 >>3303

>>15393026

>>15393176

 

oh never mind.

it's been Deboooooooonked

kidding

 

> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/12/16/fact-check-no-trump-request-10000-guard-troops-jan-6/8929215002/

 

Fact check: Trump repeats false claim that Pelosi rejected request for National Guard ahead of Jan. 6

McKenzie Sadeghi

USA TODAY

 

The claim: Nancy Pelosi rejected Donald Trump's request for 10,000 National Guard troops to be deployed before Jan. 6

 

As a House committee continues its investigation into the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and former President Donald Trump goes on a speaking tour, debunked narratives about the deadly insurrection are resurfacing on social media.

 

Reports show military and law enforcement officials were unprepared and slow to respond to the riot. Trump has repeatedly attempted to blame that on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., claiming she rejected his request to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol ahead of his “Stop the Steal” rally.

 

Trump’s claim is one of many efforts by Republicans and supporters of the former president to shift blame and downplay the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol that resulted in four deaths and led to more than 600 arrests.

 

“Trump Says Pelosi Turned Down His Request For 10,000 National Guard Troops For Jan. 6 Rally…!!!” reads the caption of a Dec. 13 Facebook video that accumulated more than 4,000 views within a couple days.

 

The video included in the post shows Trump speaking to a crowd on Dec. 11 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, where he claimed he recommended 10,000 National Guard troops be deployed because he knew the crowd size was going to be "enormous."

 

“I recommended 10 but I said do whatever they want, they’re running the Capitol, they know what they’re doing,” Trump says in the video. “And the Capitol police knew about it, she (Pelosi) knew about it, and they turned it down because they said it didn’t look good.”

 

But Trump’s claim was debunked by fact-checkers in March, after he first made the statement during a Fox News appearance, and it’s still not true. There is no evidence Trump made any formal request about deploying 10,000 National Guard troops before the rally.

 

Our rating: False

 

Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that Pelosi rejected Trump's request for 10,000 National Guard troops to be deployed before Jan. 6. Pelosi's office said the speaker was not contacted about deploying the National Guard prior to the rally, and the Pentagon has previously stated that there is no record of the request. A timeline from the Department of Defense about the events leading up to Jan. 6 does not include any mention of a request for 10,000 National Guard members. The former House sergeant-at-arms said he did not have any discussions with congressional leaders about the National Guard until the day of the riot.

Our fact-check sources:

 

Drew Hammill, Dec. 16, Phone interview with USA TODAY

PolitiFact, March 2, No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it

The Washington Post, March 2, Trump falsely claims he 'requested' 10,000 troops rejected by Pelosi

USA TODAY, July 27, Fact check: Nancy Pelosi wasn't 'in charge' of Capitol Police on Jan. 6

USA TODAY, March 2, Fact check: U.S. Capitol Police Board oversees the force, along with congressional committees

Department of Defense, Jan. 11, Timeline

Rev, Feb. 23, Senate Hearing on January 6 Capitol Attack Transcript

USA TODAY, Feb. 23, Politics live updates: Capitol Police acted in same ways for riots, George Floyd protests, former chief says

Vanity Fair, Jan. 22, 'The president threw us under the bus': embedding with Pentagon leadership in Trump's chaotic last week

 

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app, or electronic newspaper replica here.

 

Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

Anonymous ID: b94eda Jan. 16, 2022, 3:37 p.m. No.15393228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3242 >>3303

>>15393192

>it's been Deboooooooonked

 

>kidding

>it's been Deboooooooonked

 

>kidding

 

>>15393026

even the commies admit it.

Headline says it, but not seeing it in the article. I watched some of that hearing with Chris Miller, and I heard him say the troops were approved. That would be a good source.

Fake news playing semantics.

approvedvs 0rdered

Anonymous ID: b94eda Jan. 16, 2022, 3:40 p.m. No.15393242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3303

>>15393228

>>15393026

Reuters has it

 

> https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congresswoman-says-trump-administration-botched-capitol-riot-preparations-2021-05-12/

 

May 12, 202110:57 AM EDTLast Updated 8 months ago

United States

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

By Jan Wolfe

 

2 minute read

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

 

May 12 (Reuters) -President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rallythat ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

 

Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment.

 

According to Miller's testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia's mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden's presidential election victory.

 

Trump told Miller to "fill" the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: "Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights."

 

Miller made the remarks during a contentious hearing held by the House Oversight Committee, which is investigating security failures in the days leading to and during the riot.

 

Representative Carolyn Maloney, the Democrat who chairs the committee, demanded answers from Miller on why National Guard troops did not arrive until hours after the building was overrun.

 

Miller testified that the U.S. military was deliberately restrained that day when Trump's rally turned into an assault by hundreds of his followers that left five dead, including a Capitol Police officer.

 

Miller testified that he was concerned in the days before Jan. 6 that sending National Guard troops to Washington would fan fears of a military coup or that Trump advisers were advocating martial law.