Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 8:38 p.m. No.15395404   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5446

>>15395334

There were back when I used to back in 2018 (Night Shift and not that often because others would beat me to it).

It all changed after /Comms/ fully took over in 2019 and GYB would insist on new Anon Bakers taking the Baking class first.

Even those that did would get hounded by the goons about how they did all kinds of little shit wrong and the you suck bad gtfo moran treatment (pic related).

So, as a result nobody new did and the old ones like me quit it altogether.

But, to stay factual, after they got booted in late '20 there wasn't a big rush back in to do it either.

Just like there still isn't now under this new admin.

Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 8:57 p.m. No.15395534   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5548

>>15395409

Even those of us branded as "OSS crew" and "Allies of former management" will tell you that OSS went too far many times even if it was mostly the same few "usual suspects".

And on occasion other Anons just voicing there opinions like those of us are now got fragged by him.

Which he often apologized for and toldthem to appeal.

That said, he's back to being non-admin so the focus now is on the new admin.

And their behavior is similar if not exactly the same.

The Civil War also rages on because of posts by "allies of the new management" like this one:

>>15395412

Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 9:14 p.m. No.15395634   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5652

>>15395548

My take has always been do not delete unless absolutely necessary because illegal or legit spam (you know it when you see it).

Because it breeds suspicion even if what was deleted is pretty much crap and leads to narratives from those with less than honorable intent.

This applies to every admin past, present, and future.

Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 9:17 p.m. No.15395651   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15395554

> I went there a few times and none did.

This is true.

And in the beginning parts of that thread there were some pretty decent discussion items asking for refutation.

Of course all hell broke loose after that and name-calling by both sides dominated.

Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 9:25 p.m. No.15395691   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5705 >>5716 >>5720

>>15395626

>No anons had any say whatsoever.

Even though FJ legit fucked up (or was compd) and gave Jim the opening he needed, there is still an air of illegitimacy hovering over the new admin's heads because of that.

The shock of springing it on Anons the way they did (I first brought it up after seeing it on the Board Log when it was only 7 minutes old) was absolutely the wrong way to go about it.

As a result they have a yuge hole to climb out of if they have any hope of having their reign get the approval of the vast majority still here.

And if /godspeed/ really does become a new board and is done right it will prolly end up being a 50/50 split of what's left of the once mighty QR.

Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 9:27 p.m. No.15395703   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15395689

>Why did Jim start his little podcast with a snide reference to Q as "superstar, miss you"? Didn't seem friendly. Just seemed like some fag who wants his website to get moar traffic and Q is a traffic generator. And the board mgmt change he orchestrated was directly related to that mindset. That's what it seemed like.

Really?

I did not know that.

That is fucked up.

Anonymous ID: ec5c3f Jan. 16, 2022, 9:32 p.m. No.15395734   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15395652

No it's not.

The deletions/banning I could see being justified before (although I myself would have still refrained) was from Vatican Shill.

That nigger just kept going on and on with the same shit and only to antagonize OSS.

Those weren't the only incidents, but the vast majority of it.