Anonymous ID: 56051d Jan. 16, 2022, 10:03 p.m. No.15395863   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5905

>>15395843

>Figure it out yourself or next time you see one ask questions without being an asshole.

I was making those kind of connection maps 3 years ago and posting them here for anons to share and understand. There's nothing in the one you posted to figure out; it's just gibberish. You have trouble distinguishing an attack on yourself and an attack on the idea you're presenting; they are in fact mutually exclusive.

Anonymous ID: 56051d Jan. 16, 2022, 10:30 p.m. No.15395960   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15395916

Anons look at my posts and they look at yours. They see who uses logic and who uses insults. They see who is here to help, or at least try to, and who is here to mislead. I called out your post in my own as misleading and you've gone on a multi-post rant about how I should get smarter and how I'm an asshole because I was condescending. Yeah, re-read that last sentence.

Anonymous ID: 56051d Jan. 16, 2022, 11:27 p.m. No.15396158   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6168

>>15396147

>You really have a problem in your brain. You deserve to be banned, because you are an angry miserable piece of shit that makes everyone else angry and miserable. You're literally scum. You spend all day here doing nothing but attacking everyone else, and you have been doing it for years.

Okay, first thing's first: You claim yourself, with the very ID you're using in this bread, that you weren't a BV here until the end of May. So were you or were you not a BV? The only known BV from end of May until lately was OSS. Which is it?

Anonymous ID: 56051d Jan. 16, 2022, 11:35 p.m. No.15396175   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6184 >>6189

>>15396162

>I WOULD BAN YOU EVERY CHANCE I COULD GET BECAUSE YOU ARE FUCKING CANCER.

Of course you would. You don't like being exposed. For the sake of argument, I don't normally make that many mistakes but I'll just CTRL+F my ID and yours and make sure it was you I was engaging with.