Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 12:20 p.m. No.15399204   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15399146

I uploaded the photo, then downloaded the full size pic from 8kun and uploaded it again.

 

Both time I got the same hash.

 

>>15399148

If that's the case, then it's specific to that pic and/or platform specific based on user.

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 12:30 p.m. No.15399272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9283 >>9320

>>15399251

Well when you upload a file on here, you get a filename based on the sha-256 hash of the file content.

 

WHEN THIS IS NOT THE CASE, that means there is special platform handling of it based on some reason.

 

Otherwise it's always the case.

Always sha-256.

 

When I hash an archived copy of AMERICA.png, I get sha-256 hash of 404c7678d96b3457494e880a914e3ff9589e4892b4ee2fbb28d579a0d5adff2b (404, is this supposed to be funny?)

 

This means special platform handling of some sorts.

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 12:47 p.m. No.15399450   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9474

>>15399431

>Faulty tests are not proof that what is being tested doesn't exist.

Show me a way to detect "covid" without saying "use the PCR test or another test based on the PCR test, which can - according to the inventor of PCR - not detect if you are sick or not"

 

If you can't, it's a hoax.

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 12:52 p.m. No.15399497   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9548

>>15399474

>Your question is for the scientists at the Wuhan lab who manufactured the virus.

Fiction.

Show me FACTS, not fake news nonsense lies.

 

>You can't argue for anything's non-existence

What I'm saying is show me proof.

If you can't, it doesn't exist.

 

"But but Santa exists"

"Show me proof then"

"So you think Santa doesn't exist? Are you a Santa denier??? Santa exists"

 

Same shit w/ covid.

They renamed the flu and called it covid.

And then based on the tests that don't work and the corrupt pharma system more and more got called "covid".

 

It's "how to create a new disease 101".

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 12:53 p.m. No.15399506   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9552

>>15399496

Well, I just tried .PNGs and I got different hashes.

So yes, my assumption (based on archiving tons of files) was wrong. It seems 8kun handles PNGs differently, which is very surprising.

 

I have to test a bit more.

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 12:57 p.m. No.15399537   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9606

>>15399520

No, I just tried a re-re-upload and still got different hashes.

 

Maybe it's really a platform bug of some sorts and it's appending extra data. I have to look into the binary data of the files.

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 1 p.m. No.15399579   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9585

>>15399548

>ignorance

It's ignorance to believe something exists WITHOUT PROOF of it existing.

 

>Absence of evidence is not equivalent to evidence of absence.

Yes, but it's more reasonable to think that someone doesn't exist when there is no proof of it existing instead of believing that it exists despite lack of any evidence what-so-ever AND it being used by criminals.

 

They renamed the flu.

The flu isn't gone.

That is all.

Anonymous ID: de2b4b Jan. 17, 2022, 1:04 p.m. No.15399618   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15399606

I just compared 2 copies of the "same" photo uploaded to 8kun.

There are different bytes.

Maybe it's really a platform bug and handling .png files incorrectly.