Who was the "possibly Trump twatter" and what is the link to the twat?
What is the link to the anon flag post?
Which one. There's a lot
Thanks
Disregard
I personally could not duplicate the hash, of course I'm not tech savvy either. I tried different methods of saving, copying and pasting the image with no luck.
There is a method which you can assign a unique hash to an image using an algorithm in Linux. This is beyond my abilities to try and duplicate. I'm sure anyone with basic coding knowledge can do it. It would seem possible for someone to be able to assign this hash to the image before posting it.
barronjohn1946 did not have anything posted that seemed to fit with these posts. The dates of the last posts were way off from being recent.
Papi is considered legit and seems to hold strong to producing quality intel. The pinned Tweet on the page and other Tweets have shown decode possibilities. So, it is not without reason to believe that Papi and the 8kun post in question are related. Especially with the time stamp.
If Papi was a fake account, it would be easy for the owner to create a fake hash for the image and post the image at the same time they posted the Tweet.
If Papi is a legit account, which seems to be the held belief at this point, it would be very difficult to post something like this.
It is not without reason to consider that someone could have had the flag already hashed and was waiting for Papi to post something relevant. This would take a lot of dedication, or a large team (cough-china-cough). But, this does not seem like something that could lead to division, it would only bolster anons to push forward and hold the line.
The only thing I could see that this could lead to IF Papi was a fake account, is the attempt to persuade anons to believe Q was posting on Papi Twat. This, I believe, is not something to worry about. Anons know Q only posts to 8. Anons also know this type of double posting has been used many times by PDJT.
With this in mind I would say that this was a legit comm.
Sorry, It's almost time for me to go to bed. Long night.
I don't believe they deleted the bread.
From what I have read tonight, OSS baked two breads. OSS then used the same IP to post spam, and supposedly CP, don't know the truth on this one. The spam was deleted, ad only the spam. BUT, since OSS had used the same IP for both the bread and the spam, the whole bread was deleted along with it.
This was a set up by OSS to get the breads deleted. Whatever grievances OSS may have had, they went out the window with this low handed trick to destroy two breads.
>>re-auth
What are you saying here?
I never said it was Q posting. I said I believe it was DJT using the image from a Q post.
>>B fuggery
What?
Not following you.
Did you not read my entire post. I was saying they did not intentionally delete it. They did not delete it by saying hay let's delete it. They deleted the spam. OSS used the same IP to connect the spam to the bread. Bread was deleted by OSS booby-trap, not by intention of others.
I usually mind my own business here and just dig and provide decodes and news. What has been going on has crossed a line. OSS and their team have intentionally boobie-traped two breads leading to their deletion. This was a direct and malicious act against the board, 8Kun, and anons. OSS has made a direct threat against this board on this bread. This can not be allowed to continue.
How to proceed? I hope BO can develop a means to address this.
>>And just so we are clear, I'll make 751 posts per bread all day long if it keeps you pieces of shit from destroying something we have put almost 5 years into