Deals with sex offenders but got very close to Sec. 230
Public square.
PACKINGHAM v. NORTH CAROLINA
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1194_08l1.pdf
"Even with these assumptions, the statute here enacts a prohibition
unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate with one another on any subject that might come to mind.
With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many
are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for
employment, speaking and listening in the modern PUBLIC SQUARE,
and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment rights. Even convicted criminals—and in some instances especially convicted criminals—might receive legitimate benefits from
these means for access to the world of ideas, particularly if they seek
to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives. Pp. 6–8"
Opinion of the Court
By prohibiting sex offenders from using those websites, North Carolina with one broad stroke bars access to
what for many are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and
listening in the modern PUBLIC SQUARE, and otherwise
exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. These websites can provide perhaps the most
powerful mechanisms available to a private citizen to
make his or her voice heard. They allow a person with an
Internet connection to “become a town crier with a voice
that resonates farther than it could from any soapbox.”
Reno, 521 U. S., at 870.