The thing I can never tire of is how the current BO and his retard BVs cannot, for the life of them, refute anything OSS posts, so they resort to namecalling from several VPNs to "create consensus", whereas the posts that namecall him are so low-effort and so clearly, outstandingly non-anon they can be picked out from miles away. Oh sure, they "pretend" to "fit in" by throwing in some keks and pepes, but it's clear as rain they're just reusing the same pics over and over again.

All it takes is one cursory read of threads where OSS posts to see how inauthentic the vast majority of posters attacking him are. Actual anons have been through years of trolling and shivving each other with words, and Jon "Gerbil" Doodle can't even manage to call him a faggot. Pff.

>>15411957

I mean, sure, BO doesn't have to prove he deleted two whole breads worth of posts and notables, he just has to claim OSS posted CP of his own kids without ever providing anything in terms of proof.

Because, you know, actual moderation and administration is equivalent to lynching for trumped up charges.

>>15412002

So in the process of banning "some fag BVs hate", they removed two entire breads worth of posts and notables, with OSS not even baking said breads.

So at what point do you just realize you're so full of shit not even the biggest drain can take it?

>>15412020

Ah, but, see, I've seen both breads before they were deleted and OSS at most had 60+ posts there, with other content being the usual bullshit, with some pearls thrown in.

This is still not addressing the fact that BO tried to deflect his deletion by saying OSS posted CP, which he never did, and that OSS baked said breads, which he did not. So you're just going to sideskip the fact that BO lied to everyone's faces to keep his own vendetta going while throwing a legit baker under the bus in the process? The ends justify the means, right?

>>15412042

>if you keep engaging them they will not stop

Hah, knowing OSS from his entire tenure here, he's not stopping either way. Long story short, you fucked with the wrong autist.

>>15412051

>actual attempts at discussion is now spam

the absolute state of /qresearch/

The screencaps OSS posted of the thread are proof enough that actual work was done there. But you're just going to lie about that and ignore said proof. Predictable. Can't let anything pierce your bubble.

>>15412079

>accuses of violent racism

>calls someone a nigger

that none of you ever get an aneurysm is astounding

>>15412092

And look at that. He has no way to refute the fact that I am trying to have a discussion related to the significantly unfair, biased treatment and overall ruining of the board by the BO, so he just repeats what he said before without addressing anything.

Feels pretty hebrew to me.

>>15412107

>tries to kvetch his way out of the fact he uses a known word the leftist anti-racists get ape-retarded over by saying it's an entire phrase

delicious

>>15412116

>monkey

oh hey JonDoodle

>>15412122

so the thing is, you're getting called that because of prior art from a certain book you all wanted to ban forever that stated plainly this is what you do, so, you know, if the shoe fits.

>falsely presuming

I mean, the facts speak for themselves, don't they? All of my posts here have been manually input, they are replies keeping discussion up and present things without any sort of spam involved, yet you keep saying it is spam simply because you don't agree with it. Pretty transparent, don't you think?

>>15412148

Oh I don't think you do. Unless you're saying that you're actually the former poster who got his panties in a twist about "violent racism" while using a word that his particular clan says is racism personified. I am calling out the hypocrisy. So thanks for proving my point I guess.

>>15412181

Hahaha, okay, this one's delicious and I'm taking this one as a badge of honor. Omnislashing time!

>You all? Are you insane?

So tell me how the entire world didn't want to ban Mein Kampf for years and years, with the mere thought of translating it causing violent seizures.

>Oh no they don't, facts must be identified and proved.

So about that, OSS has posted identified facts and proved them with his screencaps over and over, but you refuse to accept them. Some facts are more factual than others I guess.

>No, I am saying it's spam because it's deliberately designed to interfere with Q research.

Oh, so that's the current definition, then? So remember when OSS was banning the actual repeated spammers for the same, and you cried your lungs out at the "unfair treatment"? The difference here is that when OSS had friendly fire incidents, he immediately unbanned and apologized. Where is the apology for the baker who baked the two removed breads and got banned? Didn't see one.

>Here, it's much different, because here it's Hive Mind.

Repeating phrases with nothing to back them will not get you far. You don't even get what being a Hive Mind actually means. You cling to past glory like an injected outsider. You might as well just tell me you are legion and you do not forgive and do not forget.

>Have you stopped to think why after 4 years of spamming the breads, that your desired outcome has not occurred?

Oh, so now it was me who was spamming the breads? So, please address the fact that OSS called out multiple spammers that seemingly disappeared after the 12th, like the loli/gore posters, the 66 million image spammer, the p=payseur guy and vatican shill? Because they HAVE disappeared and it's easy to confirm by just looking at the breads. So what happened? I am 100% certain OSS has been banning them, and yet they returned every single time. What happened?

So please, address said facts. Or just tell me I'm lying again and keep kvetching.

>>15412202

>here, watch me pull these VPNs out of my hat to create consensus

>>15412241 (me)

Aaaand silence. Predictable.

>>15412307

To be fair, I'd be pissed the fuck off too if the faggots I've been at war with for at least two years took over and claimed I've been posting CP of my own kids to "sabotage a bread I made myself".

>>15412320

>>15412321

In your language, "drama" means "unaddressed issues related to significant fuckery of the current owners of the board that they've been called out for and are now ignoring and are trying to sweep under the rug". Your priorities are fucked, shlomo.

>>15412336

>OSS is showing that when it comes down to it, OSS cares about OSS and not the board.

Yes, I am sure him warning anons about the fuckery, the injected "anons", fake Q posts and preparations for a false flag that will get pinned on this board are him not caring about the board. I am sure him giving them the exact same medicine he was forced to endure for his entire tenure as BV and, prior to that, investigating the circlejerk, was him caring about himself more than the board.

>>15412346

Hello. I am simply too tired to enter ## Board Owner into the name field. Last night I was taking way too many cocks up my ass and I am now worried I might have AIDS.

Please understand my difficulties.

• BO

>>15412357

Me? Ranting? Nervous breakdown?

This entire bread I was attempting to have a discussion based around facts and events that have happened within the last week. You might be mistaking me for someone else, fredo.

You also make the mistake of assuming your feelings are relevant here in any way, shape or form.

>>15412368

>he thinks I'm OSS

this is precious. You literally cannot accept a world where other anons support him. That's pretty pitiful.

>>15412389

>Spam need not be engaged in the way you demand.

you call it spam, without even acknowledging the contents of the posts. Says much more about you than his form of presenting it. You have not addressed the contents, at all, whereas it's the contents that matter and contain proof. You are ignoring the proof. You are the ignorant one here.

>Oh so all the claims you made are the 'current definitions' then?

You claimed the definition of "spam" is "things that interfere with Q Research". Per your definition, OSS was acting according to the rules. You pushed yourself into a corner.

>No, OSS BV was banning legitimate memes, legitimate posts, not 'spam'.

So it's my time to ask for proof, fren. Or will you just ignore it? Because I very definitely remember his bans for crying repeatedly that the spammers and disruptors got bans which, correct to your above definition of spam, was interfering with Q Research.

>Only as a psyop to trick anons into thinking the zillion bans prior to that were 'friendly fire'.

That's some mighty-fine mental gymnastics. You're assuming a level of such deep pre-planned activity that is not reflected in reality, basically lying to yourself to stay in the right, like a legit schizophreniac. So basically the things you were projecting at him all this time.

>Anons saw what happened.

We sure did. And what we saw was him fighting against an organized team of shitstirrers who made a sport of trying to disrupt the board and lead off genuine research into the ditches while, when in control of the dough, removing notables from it. This is a confirmed fact, JonGerbil. You were one of those who did.

>Banning anti-muhjoo memes, calling anons names, labelling 'belligerent' anons as kikes or jews, and spamming the breads with muhjoo crap day after day after day.

So… banning spam, as per your above definition again? These things were disrupting the board. Something's amiss here, wouldn't you agree?

>Spam.

Hahaha. Tell that to the baker and notetaker of these two breads.

>>15412391

>Hive Mind is a phrase that no anon is obligated to explain to you personally.

>literally trying to NO U

precious

>entire Hive Mind paragraph of word salad

you're literally trying to bring linguistic philosophy into a phrase anons have used for significantly different reasons way back when the phrase was coined. You are not a natural anon based on this one single fact. I bet you can't even name the origin of the phrase. Inb4 "ooh you don't deserve me telling you". Predictable.

>You're like leeches. Parasites. Shrinking every day because the 'host' is rejecting the draining and leaving you helpless and angry.

So what was that about namecalling, labelling and projecting?

>OSS were themselves spammers

Proof, please. Please provide proof that OSS was the spammers who spammed the threads back then. Please. If you value your position in this discussion.

>Kek, nice try lying faggot, Q confirmed P = Payseur.

So you're just attacking a fact that the spammer used instead of referring to the actual acts of spam said spammer did. What was that about low IQ?

>The muhjoo spamming hasn't stopped.

>I'll ignore all the rest of the mentioned spammers and instead reach for something totally different.

It's like you're not even trying.