Anonymous ID: 5d2dc3 Jan. 19, 2022, 9:48 a.m. No.15414674   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4746

>>15414220

Whether this is really DJT or not, the thing about INFORMATION is that it can all stand or fall on its own merits.

 

Like I could speculate by saying the timestamp of 11:53 could be a Q proof that "SS" -"[O]SS" was a 'typo', an error, a MISTAKE, and corrected. Almost 4 years in advance.

 

Or, I could speculate that this post was made by an 'inauthentic' anon trying to convince Anons to trust anon drops as Q/Q+ drops.

 

Either way it's all about the information.

Anonymous ID: 5d2dc3 Jan. 19, 2022, 9:55 a.m. No.15414740   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4750 >>4752

>>15414711

No, I was only referring to the claim "OSS predicted there would be larping", that claim alone is what I was referring to, not any other drop here.

Anyone on their way out the door can 'predict' what will happen later onโ€ฆ.if they are the ones who will be posting that shit and blaming others, (projection).

Anonymous ID: 5d2dc3 Jan. 19, 2022, 10:09 a.m. No.15414857   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15414836

How do you know 'new' is in anon's mind?

Anons already showed it's a repost.

Obviously anons cannot be accused of thinking it's new when it was anons who posted the proof it's a repost.

You're quick to attack anons.

Why?

I know why.