>>15418093, >>15418068, >>15418632 The cabal is so fucked Q489 Q1249 Red Cross Hacked

Q: Red, Red. Was Q insinuating two “Red” organizations that money laundering, trafficking etc

I was thinking about the Salvation Army Red Kettle program of donations, how the lost donations at Christmas saying white people had to apologize to black people.

They are not much different than red cross. They rely on donations WW and are into a lot of different areas, similar to The Red Cross. Look at the areas of work and countries they are in.

Anons, this might be a stretch but theres a lot of foundations involved in the horrors of trafficking, many of them by religious organizations, major churches etc

Did anyone catch the air Q at the rally?

Trump + The Great Awakening

The Air Q

https://t.co/xPg1X6REMQ

https://twitter.com/Awakethepatriot/status/1483184171715825664?s=20

>>15419628 Anons hear Our President on Levin's show? He dropped the C-Bomb

I thought the C world was Cabal

JOHN BARRON

Biden is not tuff on Russia He’s tough on Republicans and that’s not him -that’s the cabal That surrounds him

https://t.co/qcIKys9jXa

https://twitter.com/POTUS_TRUMP_46/status/1482558758526263297?s=20

>>15419775, >>15419854, >>15419926, >>15419928, >>15419932, >>15419944, >>15419949 Covid 19 Positive Patients' organs donation/bioweapon chosen for organ harvesting among other sinister agendas & profits?

Black markets, transplant kidneys and interpersonal coercion. Pro Argument for legally buyingkidneys==J S Taylor

One of the most common arguments against legalising markets in human kidneys is that this would result in the widespread misuse that is present in the black market becoming more prevalent. In particular, it is argued that if such markets were to be legalised, this would lead to an increase in the number of people being coerced into selling their kidneys. Moreover, such coercion would occur even if markets in kidneys were regulated, for those subject to such coercion would not be able to avail themselves of the legal protections that regulation would afford them. Despite the initial plausibility of this argument, there are three reasons to reject it. Firstly, the advantages of legalising markets in human kidneys would probably outweigh its possible disadvantages. Secondly, if it is believed that no such coercion can ever be tolerated, markets in only those human kidneys that fail to do away with coercion should be condemned. Finally, if coercion is genuinely opposed, then legalising kidney markets should be supported rather than opposed, for more people would be coerced (ie, into not selling) were such markets to be prohibited.

It is well known that a thriving international black market in human kidneys exists and also that the vendors in such a market suffer from a variety of abuses, ranging from fraud to outright coercion.1 Yet at the same time that the horrors of the black market in human kidneys are becoming widely recognised, there is growing support for markets in kidneys to be legalised.2,3,4,5,6 Believing that trade in human kidneys cannot be eliminated,some people support its legalisation on the grounds that if it is legalised the abuses that now occur in the black market can be mitigated through regulatory control.7 Others adopt a more principled approach, arguing that legalising markets in human kidneys is required to respect the moral values of personal autonomy and human well‐being.8 The proponents of legalisation hold that once such markets are legal, the ability of their participants to seek legal redress against fraud and coercion would suffice to protect them from abuse.

Yet, many who oppose such legalisation claim that it is naive to believe that regulated markets in human kidneys would mitigate the abuses of the black market. Rather than mitigating the abuses of the black market, such people claim, legalising markets in human kidneys will increase them. This is because the typical kidney vendor would lack adequate access to legal representation and so the protections that the proponents of kidney markets believe would be ensured by regulatory control would be illusory.

If it is true that legalising markets in human kidneys would in practice increase the number of people who suffer from the abuses inherent in the black market, then this would be a powerful objection to legalising them—even if in theory legalising this market is required owing to consideration for autonomy or concern for human well‐being.

Con: Responding to the pro‐market argument from regulatory control

Despite the elegance and simplicity of this pro‐market argument, many who oppose legalising a market in human kidneys find it unpersuasive, for they believe that it fails to represent how a kidney market would operate in practice. As Scheper‐Hughes12 writes

Armchair bioethicists can ignore the real world and its messy social, economic, cultural, and psychological realities. They only need conjure up a hypothetical world where conditions can be controlled or manipulated so as tofavour the logic of a market approach to increase the “supply” of human organs for transplantation. (Fauci’s wife is a bioethicist)

Such critics reason that the proponents of the pro‐market argument assume that those who participate in a legal kidney market would have access to legal recourse if they were defrauded or coerced into selling their kidneys. They claim, however, that in reality this will probably not happen. The people who sell their kidneys will typically be the desperate poor, “nobodies”,13 a “discredited collection of anonymous suppliers of spare parts”,14 who are “socially invisible”,15 and “naive”,16 and whose voices have been “silenced”.17 Although not every kidney vendor is disenfranchised in this way, there is a subset of vendors who clearly do suffer such a fate: those who are so under the control of their family members that they could be coerced by them into selling their kidney against their will.1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563357/

>>15420985

Organ Trafficking: The Unseen Form of Human Trafficking

June 26, 2018

Organ trafficking, a lucrative global illicit trade, is often a lesser discussed form of human trafficking among anti-human trafficking stakeholders due to its intricate and often stealth nature. Trafficking sex and/or labor are the more commonly thought of forms of human trafficking among public policy leaders and general awareness campaigns. However, organ trafficking holds a critical place with transnational organized crime groups due to high demand and relatively low rates of law enforcement.

Organ traffickers profit in the shadows, while their destructive medical footprint is the only thing that is felt. It leaves vulnerable populations, aka “donors,” and first world beneficiaries, aka “recipients,” open to severe exploitation and a lifetime of health consequences.

This form of illicit trade also leaves the private sector, in particular the financial industry, susceptible to being an unknowing conduit for its facilitation. Although, with the right training and raised awareness, financial institutions may play a pivotal role in unmasking organ traders by way of the financial trail they leave behind.

Low Supply, High Demand

When describing organ trafficking, there is often confusion as to how this crime can happen. Global Financial Integrity (GFI) estimates that 10 percent of all organ transplants including lungs, heart and liver, are done via trafficked organs.1 However, the most prominent organs that are traded illicitly are kidneys, with the World Health Organization (WHO) estimating that 10,000 kidneys are traded on the black market worldwide annually, or more than one every hour.2

On their own, these numbers can be stark; however, when compared to average wait times for organs in developed countries, one can start to better understand the demand being diverted to black markets. In Canada, it is estimated that the average wait time for a kidney is 4 years with some waiting as long as 7 years.3 In the U.S., the average wait time for a kidney is 3.6 years according to the National Kidney Foundation.4 In the U.K., wait times average 2 to 3 years but could be longer.5

Hiding in Plain Sight

Once obtained, trafficked organs can be transplanted to recipients in the most reputable of hospitals in major cities throughout the world but makeshift operating rooms in houses have often been the clandestine locations for such transplants.

Traffickers orchestrate the recruitment of the donor often from a place of vulnerability, and victims are not necessarily properly screened for their qualifications to be a healthy donor. Desperate patients in need of an organ may fall prey to a trafficker who could be posing as a “reputable” representative of an altruistic organ matching organization. Financial exploitation plays a key part in both sides of this scenario. In addition, organ traffickers could also be involved in other forms of human trafficking, such as sex and/or labor trafficking. Cases are emerging where an organ donor may have been a victim of sex trafficking and/or labor trafficking as well as a victim of organ trafficking, creating a multi-level equation of exploitation. The term “transplant tourism” is often utilized in describing this crime, as defined by the Declaration of Istanbul:….

In most countries, the buying and selling of organs is illegal (e.g., Iran is the only country in the world where buying and selling an organ is legal but this exception only applies to its citizens). Conversely, there are few laws that restrict an individual from leaving one’s country to obtain an organ from someone abroad. In fact, there are many companies that cater to “transplant tourism” but purport to only match up recipients with donors who are willing.

It is difficult to know exactly how much transplant tourism generates annually worldwide but it is estimated that the illegal organ trade conservatively generates approximately $840 million to $1.7 billion annually, according to GFI.8

Continued…

https://www.acamstoday.org/organ-trafficking-the-unseen-form-of-human-trafficking/

>>15420999

If they estimate $1 billion its more likely 2-1/2x that much

Organ Trafficking: The Unseen Form of Human Trafficking

Unfortunately, even with estimated flow of funds crossing $1 billion annually, it is difficult for both law enforcement agents and anti-money laundering (AML) professionals to detect related financial activity. This is due to a myriad of factors such as a lack of domestic laws deterring citizens from travelling abroad, the transnational nature of the crime, and the savviness of the purveyors who know the laws related to organ trafficking well enough to circumvent them by way of shell companies and sanitized (legal) offerings via public websites.

Money Laundering Indicators

While it may be difficult for banks to detect financial transactions related to organ trafficking, it is not impossible as there are some indicators available. These red flags could include the following indicators and may be innocuous on their own but when combined, could present potentially suspicious behavior:

Wire transfers to entities in high-risk jurisdictions (See Figure A) with names that include a variation of medical. For example, “Medicus”

Methods of payment such as wires payment, email money transfer, and bulk cash withdrawal (See Figure B for estimated organ pricing)

Payments between charities and medical tourism sites

Credit card payments to travel agencies, airlines or hotels, prior to movement of money and travel

First-line banking staff indication of potentially ill customers moving large amounts of funds to numbered companies or charities prior to travel

Medical tourism websites that offer transplant services abroad that recommend utilizing their own trusted domestic doctors prior to traveling

One thing to keep in mind is that while traveling abroad to obtain an organ may be legal in certain countries, associated financial transactions would still be considered reportable in many jurisdictions as the act of purchasing an organ may be illegal within their country of citizenship. This stance gives AML professionals an interesting perspective above and beyond that of law enforcement as they are in a position to offer up intelligence that law enforcement agencies may have no insight on, nor a requirement to.

Intelligence gathered by financial intelligence units (FIUs) within financial institutions associated with organ trafficking or transplant tourism can be further disseminated to international partners by national FIUs.

Project Protect Expands: Project Organ

As previously stated, reporting on transactions related to organ trafficking is no easy feat. This way of raising awareness may prove to be an equally effective tool in deterring organ trafficking while increasing investigative knowledge toward reporting transactions….

Looking Forward

Countries like theU.S. and Canada did not include organ trafficking as a form of human traffickingwhen adopting their national laws on human trafficking. However, in the U.S. for example, some individual states like Massachusetts include organ trafficking within their state laws on human trafficking.

https://www.acamstoday.org/organ-trafficking-the-unseen-form-of-human-trafficking/

Was looking for notable events that happened on Feb. 21

https://www.onthisday.com/events/february/21