You have all been taken foe a ride.
>>1542821 I hate to see it. You anons are incredibly intelligent, but it dawned on me what has been happening. I like you guys, but I'm in my 40's. I'd bet my money somewhere else…or I guess because we all love POTUS it doesn't hurt to keep the movement going. I've been watching for months as people put in tons of man hours of research and analyzing. I surely don't want a swamp creature running things. I'm 100% POTUS, as of now. Imagine if you guys took your intellect and talent and did something REAL/tangible with it? I'm not a bot. I'm a dude who was on the Q train for months…then it hit me. I love you all. If you filter me, so be it. I can voice my opinion elsewhere. Occum's razor.
P.S. @reallygraceful is the one I'm trying to contact about my THEORY. I thought about Beanz and Sather, but they are out. I need someone non-bias: Enter Grace
>>1542821 The evidence is in the graphic and posts. Consider.
>>1542827 Shows your inability to critically think.
I hate to see it. You anons are incredibly intelligent, but it dawned on me what has been happening. I like you guys, but I'm in my 40's. I'd bet my money somewhere else…or I guess because we all love POTUS it doesn't hurt to keep the movement going. I've been watching for months as people put in tons of man hours of research and analyzing. I surely don't want a swamp creature running things. I'm 100% POTUS, as of now. Imagine if you guys took your intellect and talent and did something REAL/tangible with it? I'm not a bot. I'm a dude who was on the Q train for months…then it hit me. I love you all. If you filter me, so be it. I can voice my opinion elsewhere. Occum's razor.
P.S. @reallygraceful is the one I'm trying to contact about my THEORY. I thought about Beanz and Sather, but they are out. I need someone non-bias: Enter Grace
"Plausible deniability," is an excellent cover for what's going on here. There is motive, and there is evidence that Q is a person we all know. I'm not saying I can't be wrong. But I am saying I'd bet MY CHIPS on someone other than that pic on the plane with the thumbs up seeming to be forming a Q if you elispe the circle just so in MS paint.
>>1543160 It's an information board. You are right, to an extent.I could make my cae but it would take hours and a lot of words. I'm not a hater. I'm pointing out the fact. Evidence for Q is shaky; evidence for another person is more solid.
Over the target, anon. If you only took the blinders off, and realize JUST HOW MUCH MORE YOU HAVE THAN YOU KNOW. I like you, anon.
Snowden is not working with Jack.Nor are they on the same boat (anymore?). Jack is in legal trouble, which he will serve no time for….he'll just shell out money. Snowden has a deal in the works and will regain his freedom.
I'm pretty sure I know who has been talking to us here. Won't confirm until I have SOLID proof. Occum's razor only takes us so far. And if you are going to quote Q put it in parentheses.
I'm pretty sure I know who has been talking to us here. Won't confirm until I have SOLID proof. Occum's razor only takes us so far. And if you are going to quote Q put it in parentheses.
That is very impressive, anon. (no sarcasm). I can scarcely refute your words. I have no "come back" to that, other than I am leaning toward someone else running this..not the FBI. And that is what is intriguing to me. Much respect to you.