>Give some of those to me and I'll build a house with 'em.
That's what I was thinking. They're designed to withstand hurricane-force winds and it takes a diamond-encrusted saw blade to but through them… Use these to build residences and businesses in hurricane-prone or tornado-prone areas.
>Go to Truth Social!
You know that the CCP bought controlling rights to Truth Social already, don't you? Why would anyone want to publish any personal information on a site guaranteed to be feeding China's AI world-domination machine?
>How are THESE for digits!?
They are exactly what the Cabal wants them to be. The Banksters and their handlers decide these digits in advance. Non-corporate investors don't move the needle at all.
>do you think it is still happening today?
Yes, it's still happening in most Muslim-controlled countries. Most people aren't aware that most tribes in North America prior to European incursions also kept slaves. Some people also are nunaware that in Colonial America, there were dark-skinned people who owned slaves; and that there were initially more white/European slaves than black/African slaves. Irish people were the most numerous white slaves for many years in Colonial America. Talk of "reparations" is disingenuous because it ignores the realities of history.
>sauce?
I didn't post it because ots been posted herein weeks ago in multiple breads over a few days' time. But you're right, it;s protocol to post sauce. Try Qresear.ch; you'll find it.
>sauce?
On Thursday, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings posted online revealed seemingly indirect connections to potential business in China. MeidasTouch News found Digital World chief executive Patrick Orlando was also listed as the CEO of China Yunhong Holdings Ltd.
The company, founded in 2019, is incorporated in the Cayman Islands—an offshore tax haven—and has its headquarters in the Chinese city of Wuhan in the country's central Hubei province.
According to Chinese-language financial and investment website MoneyDJ, Yunhong is a "blank check company" created with no specific business intent other than to engage in mergers as well as securities transactions, asset acquisitions and stock purchases.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/how-donald-trumps-truth-social-is-connected-to-china/ar-AAPPmNA
There were several separate reports. MSN is a crap source, but it's the first one which came up in a quick search. It's NOT a secret.
You're scolding the wrong anon. I posted the claim, and now I've posted the sauce.
I'm not a shill, nor have I any association with the other posts you listed.
I've posted one source for sauce; you appear to want to believe a story without examining facts. Real anons want to examine facts. The Chinese buy-in was widely reported, and was posted herein multiple times by different anons. Perhaps you're the anon who's being triggered by truth.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/22/trumps-new-social-media-backer-tied-to-china-lifestyle-venture
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-truth-social-connected-china-1641496
https://www.newsweek.com/patrick-orlando-bankroller-donald-trumps-truth-social-severs-china-connections-1657236
>microsoft is your sauce???
I've now posted FOUR separate references. The burden now falls upon YOU to post sauce which refutes the reports I've posted. That's how reasoned discourse works. Go ahead, refute the published facts I've posted (and also posted by other anons in days before). I would be happy to learn how the CCP investment isn't at all going to compromise Truth Social. Until then, I remain informed by the several sources which have reported the investment/business deal.
Don't conflate BLM with black people; the former is a small subset of the latter. Judge each person by their character.
So, no sauce to refute the reports? You've got nothin'?
Thus far, you have presented ZERO sauce to refute any of the reports. I'm familiar with the "4am talking points," but if you check the record on qresear.ch, you will see the reports span multiple days. Nor have I seen the CCP link refuted on censored.news, Breitbart, conservativetreehouse or any other alternative news source. Now stop being a lazy, naysaying denier and be the researcher you're posing as herein.
You're selectively reading my posts. I've done three quick searches while you've done none. I don't "rely on" any of those news sources; mostly I "rely on" posts which are nominated and seconded asnotableherein. I also scan the aforementioned alternative news sources as my primary news inputs. Nevertheless I should not have to justify my sauce to you, since you clearly haven't read the past breads where this news was first posted (and where I first read about it). You have not done anything but naysay and launch ad hominem attacks against me. You are not rising to the level of a real anon, so I shall be done with you.
>fleeing
KYS - you cannot engage in reasoned discourse, but at least with that bit of arrogant condescension you've displayed a touch of autism. I've been around since before Calm Before the Storm. I just don't post often.