dChan
Anonymous ID: 0b5648 Jan. 21, 2022, 6:37 a.m. No.15428561   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8594 >>8612 >>8641 >>8657 >>8660 >>8690 >>9014

>>15428228

>>15428499

tyb. BO here.

Working with bakers on meta to get globals posted in dough, we're getting there. But would like to see Globals relocated to the top of Notables page (same place it traditionally was placed). No use competing with Jim's eye-catching ads.

 

Would look more or less like cap.

Previous baker posted example but didn't put in dough.

Will post as bo if you need verification, prefer low key most of the time.

 

Thinking about bakers indicating dough changes like this in Meta, what do you think? Helps continuity and transparency.

 

Admins and bakers have been having ongoing discussions about stuff like that there, as exploring ways to make things work better on qr. Please drop by.

Anonymous ID: 0b5648 Jan. 21, 2022, 7:08 a.m. No.15428702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8863

>>15428593

>It's Lin in his own words explaining his thoughts.

Lin has been explaning his own thoughts about Gen. Flynn for some time. but does he have any evidence of wrongdoing of any kind? Or is it just conjecture?

 

I am not anti-Lin but have noted several things:

  • he discouraged voting in the GA senate election in Jan 2021 (againt what @45 promoted)

  • around Dec 1, 2020, he tweeted out inaccurate information regarding the percentage of Dominion Voting Systems owned by the Chinese gov't (75% when the actual figure was 49%); see tokenist.com/what-we-know-dominion-voting-systems-and-ubs-securities. This was a careless error that was later used by "fact checkers" to discredit patriot movement.

www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/01/23/fact-check-dominion-voting-systems-foreign-investment-claim-false/4038654001/

  • the mystery guest in Lin's Fireside Chats turned out to be John Here to Help - who himself gives accounts about his treatment by the US government that have not been objectively verified, afaik.

  • Lin relied initially on charges that Flynn used a "satanic prayer" (meaning from a non Christian source) more than 30 years ago; Flynn responded he did not know where it came from. Who unearthed this story, anyways? And for what purpose?

  • if we compare the tone of Lin's vs Flynn's statements, the latter seem far more professional - that is just an opinion but i believe many would agree.