>>15436876 (lb)
>Wouldn't Trump team have know all about this?
That's what I think the line of demarcation is.
Bottom line is that Trump, or those who are behind Trump, are there to dissolve the entire DC shit show. Anyone who has future financial skin in the DC game will be anti-Trump. Adding to that, regardless of what they spout off in front of a camera, which will be the bear that bites them in the ass.
Only way to judge if a person is pro-Trump is to see if they elect to choose a new career outside of DC. Nunes is the prime example. I'll go with Manchin and Sinema, too. Those two staying in the fray just to get some good licks in before the SHTF. Payback maybe, Retiring dems might be as well. Seen't the writing on the wall and can read it. Retiring dems would actually come out of this smelling better than RINOs who decided to try to stick it out and will get bit in the ass by the bear.
Jan 6, I think Pelosi was expecting a different reaction from the protestors and tried to force the issue on the fly. She had to have dead people, IMO. Trump, calling the rally, showed that the masses of protestors would be peaceful. Pelosi has to lie her ass off and pull legal weight to gaslight that. Retiring dems, I think, don't want part of that.
TL;DR: Only those with no future political ambition are pro-Trump. With