>and it certainly is not going to point to future events.
This clockfag never made a clock that points to the future. Future proves past. Decodes aren't supposed to point to future events. Your opinion of qclock is based upon either your limited exposure or your lack of understanding.
That is a coherent point. Many decodes are complete nonsense, with or without clocks. Autists can tell which is which. The point of here was supposed to be having multiple participants decide if something is interesting or not. You say not. Ok. But "because clock" isn't going to work if there are valid decodes in some of these clocks. You can't say that there isn't if you refuse to understand the vast majority of the attempts. Clockfags are the least of this board's problems though when it comes to what makes Anons look fucktarded.