Anonymous ID: 7e143b Jan. 23, 2022, 5:58 p.m. No.15446229   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6258 >>6272 >>6273 >>6296 >>6328

>>15446194

Moron, that isn't Q linking directly to any clock image.

 

You're like those real raw news idiots claiming that site is using Q intel because a Q drop mentioned 'Raw'.

 

The CLOCK referred to in that Q drop is the difference between Q drops and POTUS tweets, NOT the clown clock.

 

The 'graphic' referred to in that drop is the amalgamation of Q drops that an anon posted that Q directly linked to and confirmed.

 

Nice try clown.

Anonymous ID: 7e143b Jan. 23, 2022, 6:08 p.m. No.15446319   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15446296

It's about time these stupid clock shills get called out.

Notice the pattern in the responses?

They have zero tolerance for questioning or criticising.

They immediately reply to criticisms with the same pattern of smears.

And they're lying through their teeth, claiming Q directly linked to a clock image and then proving that claim by posting an image that does no such thing.

Anonymous ID: 7e143b Jan. 23, 2022, 6:27 p.m. No.15446468   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15446415

>Circular flow diagram

Clown clock concept is not confirmed with this statement.

The definition of 'circular flow' is provided in the drop. It's a reference to Q posting a question or statement and then some time in the future a news event occurs and it can be better understood in the context of the Q drop.

That's what 'circular flow' means. Like this: