Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 2:30 a.m. No.15448231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8278

Must-see TV: Mark Levin interview with Peter Schweizer exposes $31 million in CCP money to the Biden family and much more~January 24, 2022

 

Biden family’s gigantic payday “for no discernable work” from corporate entities controlled by members of the CCP elite.

 

Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win, Peter Schweizer.

 

And after discussing the Biden family’s ties, toward the end of the hour, Schweizer describes the GOP politicians who have been receiving big Chinese money, including former Speaker John Boehner and (surprise!) the Bush family.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/01/mustsee_tv_mark_levin_interview_with_peter_schweizer_exposes_31_million_in_ccp_money_to_the_biden_family_and_much_more.html

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 2:35 a.m. No.15448245   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8278

There’s disturbing vaccine data coming from Scotland~Jan 24, 2022

 

The vaccines are proving to be a constantly moving target. Two shots will save us. No, three will. No, better make it four. Heck, let’s just keep it open-ended but you better get shots if you want to work, shop, eat out, go to a concert, maybe even board a plane. But what happens to this manic shot regime when we’re beginning to get data showing that, not only do the shots not prevent people from getting COVID (which is the traditional effect of a vaccine) but that they may actually leave people more vulnerable to COVID?

 

Israel, which was so terrified of having COVID shut it down, thereby leaving it vulnerable to the genocidal organizations and nations around it, embarked upon the most aggressive vaccination program in the world. Now, it’s the nation with the world’s highest per capita COVID rate, per a weekend report:

 

Israel recorded 69,201 new coronavirus cases in the past 24 hours, according to an update to the Health Ministry's website on Friday.

 

There are 427,023 active Covid cases in Israel, making it the country with the highest number of cases per capita, ahead of Slovenia.

 

The caseload, driven by the highly contagious omicron variant, includes 638 patients in serious condition and 124 on artificial lung ventilation. Of those currently hospitalized in serious condition, 84% are over the age of 60.

 

The death toll, as of Friday afternoon, was at 8,371.

 

The positivity rate in Covid tests reached record highs of 20.13 percent.

 

In total, 2.2 million Israelis were infected since the start of the pandemic. Some 4.5 million received three doses of the vaccine and over 500,000 four doses.

 

That kind of news report tells me that the vaccines don’t work as vaccines. That is, they do nothing to stop people from getting the disease. This runs counter to our 200-year-old understanding of what a vaccine is; namely, a vaccine is the single dose of a substance that triggers the body’s natural immune system ensuring that the person will never get the infectious agent that is the vaccine’s target (e.g., smallpox, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, etc.).

 

Indeed, the CDC’s Rochelle Walensky has conceded that the vaccines neither stop people from catching nor spreading COVID. The new rap from the CDC is that the shots formerly known as vaccines are now therapeutics. Oh, and there’s no end to the number you’ll have to take to get that vax pass for working, shopping, traveling, education, etc.

 

None of that, though, addresses the newest, most concerning information about the vaccines: What if it turns out that they’re not even a therapeutic? What if you get more sick, not less sick, from the vaccination? Data out of Scotland suggests that this is a real possibility:

 

Scottish data shows that the COVID-19 age-standardized case rate is highest among the two-dose vaccinated and lowest among unvaccinated! It further shows this trend of negative efficacy for the double-vaccinated persisting for hospitalizations and deaths. Something is very wrong here, and together with other data points, it raises concerning questions about the negative effect of waning antibodies, constant boosting, and the consequences of a leaky vaccine with narrow-spectrum suboptimal antibodies against an ever-evolving virus.

 

Daniel Horowitz has a detailed analysis of the data in the above-linked article, and I recommend reading it.

 

Of course, this was always a risk with mRNA vaccines. In August, Pandra Selivanov wrote about the chicken experiments that today’s arrogant scientists ignored:

 

Marek's disease affects chickens, not humans. It's one of the deadliest viruses in the world, killing one hundred percent of unvaccinated chickens in ten days. Not even Ebola, one of the most feared viruses that affects humans, kills everyone it infects. Maybe only ten percent of people infected with Ebola live, but that's still ten percent more than chickens infected with Marek's.

 

And why am I thinking about a disease that infects only chickens? It's because the vaccine for Marek's not only protects chickens against the disease but it also makes the virus far more dangerous. Vaccinated birds rarely die but can spread Marek's to unvaccinated birds, just as vaccinated humans can spread variants of COVID to unvaccinated humans.

 

At the end of all of this, we’re going to discover that the vaccines made minimal difference to the spread of COVID. I think we’ll also discover that, in America alone, hundreds of thousands of people died because the Fauci-guided bureaucratic and medical institutions insisted on these pointless vaccines while ignoring therapeutics.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/01/theres_disturbing_vaccine_data_coming_from_scotland.html

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 2:47 a.m. No.15448271   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8275 >>8389

The Jan 6th Committee's (Gulag Keepers') conduct presents a very serious and dangerous civil liberties violation.

 

What Congress is barred from doing, as two McCarthy-era Supreme Court cases ruled, is exactly what the 1/6 committee is now doing: conducting a separate, parallel criminal investigation in order to uncover political crimes committed by private citizens. Such powers are dangerous precisely because Congress’s investigative powers are not subject to the same safeguards as the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. And just as was true of the 1950s House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) that prompted those Supreme Court rulings, the 1/6 committee is not confining its invasive investigative activities to executive branch officials or even citizens who engaged in violence or other illegality on January 6, but instead is investigating anyone and everyone who exercised their Constitutional rights to express views about and organize protests over their belief that the 2020 presidential election contained fraud. Indeed, the committee's initial targets appear to be taken from the list of those who applied for protest permits in Washington: a perfectly legal, indeed constitutionally protected, act.

 

This abuse of power is not merely abstract. The Congressional 1/6 Committee has been secretly obtaining private information about American citizens en masse: telephone records, email logs, internet and browsing history, and banking transactions. And it has done so without any limitations or safeguards: no judicial oversight, no need for warrants, no legal limitations of any kind.

 

Indeed, the committee has been purposely attempting to prevent citizens who are the targets of their investigative orders to have any opportunity to contest the legality of this behavior in court.

 

How chilling this is! The committee’s targets initially are those who lawfully applied for and obtained protest permits, and since then it has been in secret getting “en masse” citizens’ email logs, internet and browsing histories, and banking transactions by sending hundreds of subpoenas to telecom companies and demanding with no legal basis these records.

 

To preclude court challenge to these subpoenas they asked these companies not to disclose the existence of the subpoenas to their customers. Now, they’ve upped the outrage by subpoenaing bank records of private citizens. Since the banks are directed not to notify customers of the subpoenas, they are unable to seek judicial review. This is unlike the FBI’s limits – that agency rarely can impose a gag order on a financial institution unless it has first persuaded a court that such a safeguard is necessary. With such a safeguard in place, in almost all cases citizens can seek judicial relief enjoining the seizure of their records. Without it, the committee is free to snoop into the personal records of anyone it chooses to under cover of secrecy.

 

The Right to Financial Privacy Act (RFPA) prohibits financial institutions from providing to the government customer’s financial records until the government authority seeking the records “Certifies in writing to the financial institution” that the customer has received notice of the attempt and an opportunity to challenge it in court. Specific provisions about service of such a subpoena and time to respond are in the U.S. Code – and none were followed by the committee.

 

In support of his argument, Greenwald tells the sad tale of how Taylor Budowich, a former Trump spokesman, found his records had been seized from JP Morgan with the connivance and approval of its attorney, former Obama Attorney General Loretta (I meet husbands of subjects on the tarmac) Lynch. The bank did everything to preclude him from seeking a judicial ruling, including refusing a Christmas Eve extension and a refusal to even provide him with a copy of the subpoena. After making sure he couldn’t fight the subpoena in a timely manner and leaving him only one option to file to enjoin the committee from using his banking records the committee and JP Morgan then said the entire question was “moot” as the documents had already been provided to the committee. Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg rejected Budowich’s request for injunctive relief on whether the subpoena was legal. The matter now goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

 

Having clearly and admittedly not followed the law respecting notice and time to challenge subpoenas, the committee argues the law simply does not apply to them – they are above it. Its response to Budowich was:

 

“The Act restricts only agencies and departments of the United States, and the Select Committee is neither.”

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 2:48 a.m. No.15448275   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15448271

Part 2…

 

Further, it argued, “Congressional committees are not required to identity a specific piece of legislation in advance of conducting an investigation of the pertinent facts. It is sufficient that a committee’s investigation concerns a subject on which legislation ‘could be had.’”

 

If that isn’t scary enough, the committee also argues that it is exempt from the safeguards of notice and opportunity to challenge even when “they are clearly engaged in investigating private citizens for potential crimes.” Think about that. If there is a majority in Congress and you represent in any way a threat to that majority, they can grab all your records – phone, email, internet, financials, without your knowledge or permitting you an attempt to challenge those actions. With a back of the hand to constitutional protections, the committee will act as if it were both law enforcement and judge.

 

But it gets even worse than that. The Select Committee claims “absolute immunity” for members and committees and argues that this immunity prohibits any litigation for redress “against Congress to which is has not consented and no such consent has been.”

 

The Project on Government Oversight raised alarms about the Select Committee’s subpoena powers. Apart from them, has the ACLU or any other group which fought against the overreaching HCUA deigned to challenge the unconstitutional usurpation of our civil liberties? I’m not hearing any. Will we even hear a congressman or senator ask the committee if it has no shame in this witch hunt?

 

On the other hand, if the predictions of a Democratic party bloodbath in the midterms come to pass, you can bet even if a Republican majority Congressional Committee complies with all the relevant laws respecting subpoenas of citizen records, including notice and opportunity for court challenge, we will hear their cries of alarm with every issuance of a congressional subpoena.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/01/the_16_select_committee_witch_hunt.html

 

These Jan 6 th Gulag Keeper douchebags need to be in the gulag cells where the Jan 6th peaceful protesters are kept, instead of the Jan 6 peaceful protesters.

 

january6th.house.gov/about/membership

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 3:01 a.m. No.15448304   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8314 >>8328

It's Still Timely And Necessary To Get The 2020 Election Right~~January 24, 2022

 

A solid majority of Americans know that the 2020 election was fraudulent. That’s a big problem for a country with a representative government, one in which the leaders are supposed to represent the will of the people. We’re a nation of laws ostensibly flowing from a Constitution that sets out explicit limitations on the federal government’s powers and protects a variety of citizens’ rights upon which said government cannot infringe. To the degree that a significant majority of citizens feel that the leader of this government was not constitutionally elected, that’s a problem.

 

For all its importance, our Constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper. It doesn’t make laws. It doesn’t have an army. It’s not the police. It’s just words on paper. It functions because Americans have confidence in its words as the foundation for the laws of our country and the guideposts governing the actions of those who actually control the army and the police and write the laws.

 

When that confidence is shaken, society’s foundation is shaken. While the fraudulent election of 2020 is not the first example of that shaken confidence in government, it’s easily the most important. From the economic upheavals wrought by the Industrial Revolution to widespread hopelessness during the Depression to the perceived fecklessness during the Vietnam War and economic malaise of the 60s and 70s, confidence in government has been shaken before but never before has the government’s legitimacy been in widespread doubt.

 

That changed with the 2020 election. Americans watched as the fraud played out in real-time, right in front of them. With violent riots in the streets that went unrestrained in the months leading up to the election, with courts inexplicably ignoring countless unconstitutional changes to voting laws, and with the media and social media censoring true stories that harmed Democrat chances, it started to seem as if the scales were tipped to one side. On election night and during the following weeks it became clear that this was indeed the case.

 

When almost 60% of the American people feel as if the man who is both the leader of the country and the head of the federal government is illegitimate, what are they supposed to do?

 

There’s nothing to be done we’re told… Not true. The election can be overturned.

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 3:06 a.m. No.15448314   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8328

>>15448304

Part 2

 

Not that I imagine there’s sufficient internal fortitude among Republicans to do so but, ideally, they should make the attempt. But how?

 

The Constitution doesn’t address anything remotely close to reversing a fraudulently achieved election. That’s true, but then it also says nothing about the right to abortion, the government providing welfare payments to citizens (or non-citizens), government control of healthcare, the imposition of CAFÉ standards, or collective bargaining rules. Indeed, there is much that goes on in government that is not in the Constitution. In 1803, Thomas Jefferson worried that the Constitution did not give him the power to make the Louisiana Purchase, but today all or part of 15 states exist because of it.

 

Like John Marshall’s judicial review doctrine, which you won’t find anywhere in the Constitution, things don’t exist until they do. In this case, in states where fraud is proven or where voting laws were enacted unconstitutionally, the legislatures should withdraw their Electoral College votes and recast them based on accurate and lawful counting of the votes.

 

It’s true there’s no existing Constitutional mechanism to facilitate that remedy, and the likelihood of a Democrat-controlled Congress doing anything to further it is less likely than a healthy college student dying of COVID, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done. It should, and it should be driven by those states where fraud so clearly occurred and tipped the election; essentially ground zero for the coup: Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, all five of which have nominally GOP legislatures.

 

Many will say that this is extra-constitutional, and that may indeed be true. But what is beyond debate is the fact that the 2020 election itself was extra-constitutional. The Constitution states that elections are to be run according to rules set by state legislatures. That didn’t happen across the country.

 

If one is going to have an election run beyond the explicit parameters of the Constitution, I’d prefer to have it hew as close as possible to what the document actually says, rather than what some hack Secretaries of State or uber partisan jurists say that it is. Our Founding Fathers gave the power to craft election rules to state legislatures and that is where it should reside.

 

Now, assuming that the legislatures of these five states—and others as they choose—take seriously their duty to address the fraud of the 2020 election, Congress will have a decision to make. Congresspeople can either engage with the states to address the issue or simply ignore them. Currently, there is zero chance of action, but after the 2022 midterms Congress will likely look different and the opportunity to address the issue can be revisited.

 

This may sound like spinning wheels, but it’s not. On the contrary, affirmatively excising the demons of the 2020 election should force all politicians or candidates to make their positions known. They either admit that the 2020 election was fraudulent and are willing to do something about it or they don’t, won’t, and should be primaried if GOP or defeated if Democrat. There can be no in between. If the flaws of 2020 are not admitted and addressed, then 2024 is gone before the campaign even begins, and almost every American understands that.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/01/its_still_timely_and_necessary_to_get_the_2020_election_right.html

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 3:14 a.m. No.15448328   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15448314

>>15448304

Part 3

 

Why this matters is simple: The nation is changing, rapidly and not in a good or constitutional way. From vaccine mandates to CRT seemingly everywhere to locales providing COVID medicines based on race to transgender men competing in women’s sports to mayors and governors essentially giving their communities over to the homeless and violent criminals, America in 2022 is not one someone from even a decade ago would recognize. It’s changing, rapidly, and in most cases against the wishes of large majorities of the American population.

 

Importantly, though, we’re not a democracy, and the Constitution is built to rein in the passions of the majorities. It’s not a suicide pact. American citizens with confidence in their election system are willing to wait for the next election cycle to direct a change of course. Those same citizens, however, if they feel that the system is fraudulent and if they know the game is rigged against them, will find alternative means to stop the evisceration of the nation so many of them cherish. When the majority—and a growing majority, at that—of a population believe their leaders are illegitimate, bad things tend to happen.

 

Illegitimate regimes can stay in power for decades, but only with an army of stormtroopers and Gestapo to suppress a cowed population. The United States is not Germany in the early 1930s nor China today and Americans are not yet cowed. Indeed, they have a 1st Amendment, a 2nd Amendment, and a 250-year-old legacy of freedom most are loath to give up. This Democrat fascism will eventually come to an end. The question is how. The ideal solution is to be found at a ballot box, with all Americans confident their votes will be counted fairly. Let’s hope our leaders can find the courage to lead us down that path.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/01/its_still_timely_and_necessary_to_get_the_2020_election_right.html

Anonymous ID: 5bd4c8 Jan. 24, 2022, 3:46 a.m. No.15448375   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15448013

>>15448010

>>15447997

>>15447995

Arrest, charge and prosecute these bastards for Treason, Election Fraud and Premeditated Mass Murder for profit….

 

Anthony Fauci

Bill Gates

Obama

George Soros

 

Moderna/CEO-Stéphane Bancel

 

Pfizer/CEO-Albert Bourla

 

Johnson & Johnson/CEO-Alex Gorsky

 

EcoHealth Alliance Pres.- Peter Daszak

 

Former NIH Director-Francis Collins

 

We the people are tired of the congressional political theater and nothing being done.

 

Resignations!!! Wait until after the Midterm elections!!!

 

Forget it, we want them arrested, charged and prosecuted for TREASON, PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER, CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING/PEDOPHILES, ELECTION FRAUD, etc. NOW!!!

 

Republican /Rino congress have had access to and been sitting on the evidence to convict Tony Fauci, Barack Obama giving the necessary basics and funding to Communist China's Military Bioweapons Lab in Wuhan, to produce bioweapons. (1500 viruses & pathogens still remain at that lab). Along with Former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins and Dr. Peter Daszak president of EcoHealth Alliance.

 

Same goes for sexual predator….Bill Clinton 26 timer on Epstein's "Lolita Pedo Express" is just as guilty as Epstein and Maxwell…when is Bill Clinton's Arrest, Charges brought, Prosecution/Trial???

 

Has any major US Politician, head of an Fed. Agency, Director or CEO of any Organization like the CDC, NIH, FDA, Big Pharma gone to prison yet? Arrested, charged and prosecuted?

 

NO, only the same status quo!

 

Has there been any significant changes in voting legislation such as voter ID, major audits or in the courts dealing with the across the country mass election fraud of 2020?

 

Nothing has changed regarding the abundant, rampant voter fraud of 2020 to restore any faith what so ever in our elections for the up coming midterms in 2022.

 

NO, only the same status quo!

 

Spine-less, brain-less & ball-less US House & Senate Republican/Rino cowards!

No wonder the corruption at the federal level has continued, this long.

 

And they let our Military be vaxed with mRNA? Brainless cowards, too!

 

The yellow bellied US Republicans better grow a pair, borrow some freaking brains and grow a spine and get it done before the Midterms!