Every time RRN debate pops up here there are two sides. One says 'this site has a disclaimer that says it's satire.' The other side says 'RRN is notable news Anons should decide for themselves if this time the headline is true'
It's very weird for researchers to declare satire as news if you feel like it's true.
Thanks for telling me you're a subversive trying to push false news into notables to sabotage qresearch.
Go ahead and believe RRN Anon. It's a free country. I've been here long enough to have learned that sources of news, satire or otherwise, should always be questioned. Your campaign to unquestioningly accept that RRN is true is very telling.
Burden of proof is yours Anon.
The burden of proof is on the Anons asserting that the story from a self-declared satire site is true. It isn't up to me to disprove it. If a novel calls itself fiction, I do not assume it is secretly true.
Copypasta says Anons have to accept satire news is true cause OSS can't prove otherwise? Ok bro.