I got a shitload to do as BO, don't want to focus mostly on baker squabbles.
But seems to be that case that the signed in e-baker doesn't want to note, so another baker who's not signed in feels justified in stealing the bake - and got his baker locked by BV.
Have i got that right?
Here's what i'd say so far:
-
When bakers are signed in, they are signed in. That matters.
-
Some bakers like to notable, others do not. One reason is long bread with many notables, a situation we are trying remedy - see >>15449227
-
It is MUCH BETTER for bakers to notable - that is (or should be) the NORM, not the exception.
If there is a baker who will notable, it would be better is the baker who cannot or will not notable to HANDOFF to baker who WILL.
For obvious reasons: it is BEST for the BOARD.
AS BO, WOULD STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THIS COURSE OF ACTION.
Could become a policy, but needs discussion - in META thread.
RIGHT NOW, by tradition, signed in baker has authority.
if e-baker will not take notes, wny doesn't the baker who WILL notable simply volunteer to take notes? He may not like that, but it would be helpful.
CURRENT E-BAKER (gerbil?):
if you can't take notes and another baker can, if it's not oss, PLEASE HANDOFF.
We don't have a policy on this but probably need one.
Right now, am just asking for your cooperation to make this board function well.
OTHER BAKER (Papi?):
Understand your frustration but if you try to steal the dough from the signed in baker, BVs will not allow it if present - because we need to follow the chain of custody for avoid more anarchy on this board.
BOTH OF YOU, please try to work together.
Come to META please, we can work this out.
''Meanwhile, if note-taker is needed, would appreciate it if SOMEBODY would step up''
.
-
BO