>>1544288 (OP of this topic) lb:
>>1543638 (other reply to OP)
>>1544195 (this anon's reply)
>>1544288 (OP's reply to anon)
Don't know what made OP of the blackboard digg think this anon (teacherfag post) was a dyncorp shill. Walked the dog thinking about it, still confuzed. After a long workfag week, maybe didn't catch the connection that school shootings were coordinated via BB, but wasn't trying to slide from that, just agreeing that BB was sketchy bc linked to marxist bullshit.
Post was meant to amplify the digg and its reply post about BB's prevalence in college and suspected use in high schools.This anon's prior work for DoD was as pharmafag, contractor. Choice to leave industry for Ed was mine, not supported. (Not a cabal asset--hardly. Live in poverty as patriot).
The shill barrage we endure gets in your head I know. John Carpenter's "The Thing" treats the subject well, of not knowing who in your ranks is an impostor. (Carpenter also did the iconic "They Live.") Anyway, when in doubt, always err on the side of suspicion, so no hard feelings on this end. Just wanted to reply for the anons studying this stuff (as I do) to try to figure out what the hell's going on. Anyone who felt this anon's post was real, your bullshit detector isn't off. It's just I replied at a more culture related level of discussion than OP. But we do have to respect that the core of qresearch is DIGGS, not culture-level impressions. Qresearch should mainly be for discussing source data, not feels and personal experiences. So sorry to have slid from that.
Ultimately it's about digging for yourself, so don't take any of our words for it. Always verify sources. No other strategy for resisting disinfo is effective.