As a reminder, in case ya'll are wondering and forgot why Fauci is still in his position:

"Fauci could be removed, but it would imply a complicated process layered with civil service protections that require the government agency to provide evidence that there is a just cause for dismissal, including failure to follow orders or misconduct.

The process to remove him would need to be initiated by someone in Fauci’s chain of command, such as the director of the National Institutes of Health or the health and human services secretary, which is unlikely considering he is an esteemed figure in the scientific and medical community.

However, should that be the case, Fauci would need to be notified about what the allegation was, and he would then have the opportunity to respond and present evidence to the Merit Systems Protection Board that such action was not warranted. He could also appeal the board’s decision in court.

While these rules are still in place, a controversial executive order issued by Trump about two weeks ago could remove these long-held service protections from tens of thousands of civil servants, making it easier to dismiss them with little cause or recourse." - November 2, 2020

Why Trump waited so long for some of these EO's is beyond me. But at least you now know why the swamp needed to get rid of him by any means necessary.

And why the Fauci hearings are just a dog and pony show. Bread and circuses for the masses.

>>15456350

>Video: How One SINGLE Mom SAVED her ENTIRE School District! Bonds for the WIN!!

I wonder if it's possible to take him out using the Surety Bond method or at least make him pay.

Surety Bond:

Individual surety bonds have been required since 1792 to protect against losses caused when public officials do not faithfully perform their official duties. These bonds are intended to protect the public and compensate those suffering loss or injury by reason of misconduct or neglect in office.1 These bonds do more than cover losses. They also encourage officials to perform the duties of office by holding them personally liable, giving them “skin in the game”, for any claims that are made against the bond. Surety companies will require the public official to pay the difference between the price of the bond and the amount of the claim. The amount of the bond depends on the office and in some cases the amount of money handled by the office

All elected public officials are required to be bonded and they must sign an oath to uphold the Constitution of their State as well as the Constitution of the United States for America. Companies, contractors, and even unions are also required to have a surety bond.

I didn't even know about this until the other day. We really are kept in the dark. Most lawyers don't even know about it.

>>15456435

What's good about the Surety Bond is that it's one on one. You don't need corrupt courts and no lawyers needed at all. The only hard part is you have to FOIA for the bond it seems because the information is kept hidden which is shouldn't. It should be part of the public information. And then you have to serve the papers to the individual.

In the case of the video, all the school districts surrounding the woman's district who she took to task did just that they tightened their buttholes right up. It was actually a Florida man who started this. The cat's out of the bag and I sure hope it turns into an avalanche.