yes.
But that was about the collapse of the financial system.
>we would be in trial mode for a lifetime.
I wouldn't have a problem with that.
Just needs more military courts.
Well at least the plot was about pulling them (putting explosives in there and getting them down)
>unlikely to have been conventional explosives.
I said explosives, not "conventional", whatever that is even supposed to mean.
Military-grade is a potential.
If you mean no explosives, why would they still put explosives somewhere? That over-complicates it without a reason to do so. They already have their "planes" used in the official narrative and the explosives where the "planes" hit are pretty obvious already. But at least these make sense in any case.
>I love the innocent.
If you did, you wouldn't blame a whole very very large group of people.
So when you write "Jews", 1 year olds are not included. At what age are they included? 10? 15? 18?
What about people like Ivanka Trump. Is she included as well?
If you "loved the innocent", you would want that GUILTY people are put in jail. I'm for that. I'm not for blaming people based on their religion or parents or bloodlines.
btw. what do you do about chidlren who were abused as very young chidlren and got broken because of that and then possibly do evil things as adults. Are these guilty too? Innocent?
Americans cut foreskin as well.
Some in Africa do so as well, do it as well w/ girls.
For these it's also a ritual (in my opinion a stupid child abuse ritual).
Some also cut it because of "medical reasons", which is also BS and basically also a ritual, which makes money on top of that.
I think none of that should be done, and none of that should be allowed, but that includes everyone.
>less died, this means it was fake and no one died
>wait, some died, but they weren't death camps, because not enough people died there
>they weren't death camps, because the official numbers aren't correct according to my numbers from TRUSTworthy organizations
>i believe numbers from corrupt organizations when they fit my retarded world view, they just have to be somewhat correct
>I don't believe them when they don't
>I also wear masks because of the coronu and got the jab too, because of these TRUSTworthy orgs
>Wait, I don't because they are lying
>But they haven't been lying back then.
Schizo.
>which is too many.
So what you are saying is that when too many post notable stuff, some should get ignored because you consider that to be "too much" for one thread?
It's not my problem that you are used to very low quality breads. Look at /qrb/ where most threads are locked ar around 100 posts or less. According to you there should only be 2 or 3 notables per thread, which is ridiculous.
Brainwash.
Why do some Muslim teach others horrible things?
Brainwash.
Why are you doing what you are doing in here since forever?
Brainwash.
I hope theY are paying well.