Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 12:06 p.m. No.15459254   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9260 >>9263 >>9268 >>9483 >>9830 >>9846 >>9863

Paul ๐ŸŽฅ๐ŸŽฌ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Watch Zachary Petrizzo, whose gets paid by rich corporate interestsfully aligned with the American ruling class

to follow, tattle and dox conservatives, run away like a little coward when confronted by someone who recognizes him. https://t.co/NBrLqtJU5B

 

https://twitter.com/PaulJEscandon/status/1485391971535437830?s=20

Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 12:29 p.m. No.15459395   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9546

>>15459315

Ok, most anons are adults here and can decide for themselves, if they dont want to read they scroll by or hide it. So my comment doesnt prove your point. Your point seems to be you are a self appointed arbiter to warn everyone danger danger Will Robinson

Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 12:43 p.m. No.15459473   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

I got a question for anons regarding JFkjr maybe being alive. When mentioned Anons pull up the Q post with question and answer, saying Q said NO! Like NO is NO and thats final.

 

Do you all really think Q would tell the DS is he was alive? Q told us disinfo is necessary mamy times, so why are anons convinced heโ€™s not alive? I cant imagine a circumstance where Q would have answered yes to that situation.

 

So Iโ€™m not one that pins my hope on him being alive, but it would be nice if one day its revealed he is.

 

Just asking because mentioning JFKjr might ne alive on the board , is like posting RRN article! Kek

Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 12:52 p.m. No.15459513   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9540 >>9715

>>15459272

Why wouldnt you consider a parody site be possibly credible? Iโ€™m sure there are plenty of parody twitters that seem extremely credible to me , like Papi.

 

No harm in letting people enjoy themselves even it is parody, since this is foremost a free speech site. Anyoneโ€™s belief is not going tp ruin your reputation.

 

We strive for truth, that doesnt mean we are right all the time, and I have no problem with what anons believe or dont believe with parody. I do have a problem an anon determining and announcing what is โ€œfake & gheyโ€

Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 1:07 p.m. No.15459596   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15459546

Listen asshole I dont give a damn about RRN but you are fixated on it like your statsi, and you know what to believe and we should limit what anons think . Do you realize you are trying to install your own cancel culture here?.

 

You dont have a point, anons dont have to share your belief, youโ€™re being a brat and not even an intelligent one.

 

Shut to fuck up about what you think is true and not true; thats the real arrogance in your statement, that you can tell anons the triuth and what to do.

 

First and forrmost asshole, we are a free speech board as long as we donโ€™t post CP or do illegal shit, anyone can say what they want

 

We seek truth doesnt mean we know everything, or mudy impose a โ€œtruth onlyโ€ policy

 

If you want to be s preacher, go find a church

Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 1:13 p.m. No.15459638   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Hi Baker and bakers

 

I havent said this in a couple of weeks, but a serious thank you all for organizing and keeping this place running. Its been very good for weeks, and is much appreciated

 

Honestly I dont know how you guys do it, but just know, Iโ€™m grateful as iโ€™m sure many anons are.

Anonymous ID: c1b6ef Jan. 25, 2022, 1:31 p.m. No.15459732   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9773 >>9775 >>9820

>>15459540

No one has said its real real, one anon that posts points out some interesting info that he believes could be real.

 

The worst part of the rucus that happens because snons dont have the self comtrol by just passing it by.

 

And why do fuck do you care even if anon or ani s believe its real? Homestly we have free will