Anonymous ID: f1d1a8 Jan. 25, 2022, 12:58 p.m. No.15459546   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9596

>>15459395

Thanks for AGAIN proving my point.

Your attacks are proof RRN is used as a weapon to distract, deflect and divide the board.

>self appointed arbiter

You're doing exactly that. Projection.

Anonymous ID: f1d1a8 Jan. 25, 2022, 1:42 p.m. No.15459818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9833 >>9838 >>9842

>>15459754

I know the excuses made to legitimate that piece of shit clock.

I know the 'interpretations' used to excuse the piece of shit clock.

You've listed them before, they all fall flat.

>It was proposed on half chan January 6, 2018

So that means what, other than 4 years?

>The next day Q said The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.

Q was referring to the timing differences between Q drops and POTUS tweets, and Q drop dates with news events on an annual delta, all of which was repeatedly referred to by Q as what Q meant.

>Q said CLOCK 32 times

NEVER THAT CLOCL IN THAT STRUCTURE.

>Are you claiming there isn't a clock?

Are you claiming that piece pf shit clock is what Q referred to?

>That this one is wrong and there is another one?

Why are you falsely insinuating that the only choice is that piece pf shit clock or no clock?

>It seems that all of you just troll any clock post (which are just Q posts and news arranged by date on a circular flow chart).

Q never directly linked to any image of this clock.

Q did directly link to annual deltas, and timing differences between Q drops and POTUS tweets.

>The meme I just posted just shows all the news/posts from :07/:37.

Random.

>These things aren't random.

Oh yes they are.

>The dates do matter

Whether dates matter or not has no bearing on whether THAT structure of dates is legitimate or Q sanctioned.