"Rights" are a fictional silly human construct.
What is that even supposed to mean, so you are pro killing of unborns? Maybe also killing newborns too? Pretty sure newborns can't survive on their own.
I'm not into psychos.
These kind of anons are not organic.
So wait, I thought it was "the Jews" and now "the Jews" have sterilized "the Jews"?
Does this make sense?
Only when most are brainwashed actors in a shitty game, just like the rest of humanity.
>you know, the one who wrote with a ballpoint pen before they were invened
I researched on this months ago.
Maybe you should do it too, instead of spreading false information written by degenerates.
https://www.presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/7/852993
Regarding the purpose and content of the 1980 expert opinion, the BKA clarifies the following:
-
the expert opinion, in accordance with the order of the LG HH, dealt only with the question of whether the writing material used to record the diaries - writing paper and writing materials - was in use during the years of the
-
world war was usual. This is confirmed in the expert opinion without any doubt as given. 2.
2 According to the expert opinion, additional inscriptions found on the original diary sheets, so-called correction inscriptions, were applied with a ballpoint pen paste that was not in use until 1951. Apparently, these are subsequently made editorial notes or corrections by another editor.
Conclusion:
The expert opinion of the BKA from 1980 states that paper and paper and writing materials used for the actual text of the diaries were used for the actual text of the diaries were available and commercially were available and commercially available.
Further findings, especially those concerning the authorship of the diaries authorship of the diaries, were not made in this report. made.
The BKA emphasizes: The expert opinion of the Forensic Institute of 1980 cannot be used to cast doubt on the authenticity of the diaries of Anne Frank. authenticity of the diaries of Anne Frank. The BKA distances itself resolutely from any speculation in this direction. speculation in this direction.
That's even irrelevant, because the report that this ballpoint stuff is based on NEVER stated that the diary itself was written with one.
I posted original sauce easlier in this thread.
The websites that state that the diary was written with one are fake+ghey and don't include sauce, because there is no sauce for that specific claim.
It says and I quote:
2According to the expert opinion, additional inscriptions found on the original diary sheets, so-called correction inscriptions, were applied with a ballpoint pen paste that was not in use until 1951. Apparently, these are subsequently made editorial notes or corrections by another editor.