>>15458500 - Schrodinger (previous notable) - part 1

This is when I started paying attention to Schrodinger

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22630221-400-einstein-and-schrodinger-the-price-of-fame/

Not sure where I got this info (newbe at the time) - downloaded the info into excel - here it is

INV-036819 Schrodinger, LLC to design and synthesize highly selective and potent Wee2 inhibitors as an option for non-hormonal contraception that can be developed to meet the user preference of women in low-income countries Global Development 2021-10 23 4938764 www.schrodinger.com Portland Oregon United States GLOBAL Family Planning

Also to add (excerpts from websites)

Schrödinger proposed that there was something unique about life that distinguishes it from the rest of the non-living world. He suggested that, unlike inanimate matter, living organisms can somehow reach down to the quantum domain and utilise its strange properties in order to operate the extraordinary machinery within living cells.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/26/youre-powered-by-quantum-mechanics-biology

So the key to avoiding strange causal behaviour (steering the future or rewriting the past) in instances of temporal separation is to accept that calling events 'simultaneous' carries little metaphysical weight.

https://www.sciencealert.com/if-you-thought-quantum-mechanics-was-weird-wait-til-you-check-out-entangled-time

Dead cat bounce?

Feb 2019

So, back to this week’s market action. Is it a dead cat bounce? Maybe, maybe not. Right now, it’s Schrodinger’s cat. Except instead of radioactive decay triggering the poisonous gas, it’s investor psychology and behavioral finance.

Given the positive market action this week, we expect to start reinvesting the cash back into the US Small and International Developed asset classes next week, bringing those up to their full allocation again…unless we open up Schrodinger’s box Tuesday morning after a long President’s Day weekend and find out, upon observation, that the cat is, in fact, dead.

http://www.atiwealthpartners.com/blog/schrodingers-cat

But the probability described above is an objective fact about the universe. It has nothing to do with the beliefs of an individual, not even the individual whose experiences are in question; that individual is being told a fact about his future experiences, whether he believes it or not. The logical theory gives an objective meaning to the probability of a single event: the probability of a future event is the truth value of the future-tense proposition that that event will happen

https://aeon.co/essays/does-knowledge-of-the-past-and-present-determine-the-future

Thomas Kuhn

The detectors designed and constructed for the LHC are called ATLAS, CMS, ALICE, and LHCb, and are towering monuments to the most advanced technology.

https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/articles/when-past-becomes-future-physics-in-the-21st-century/

One might say the cat exists in an indeterminate state until it’s observed.

Recent experiments suggest Schrödinger’s “absurd” conclusion may be right. Zeilinger’s work with huge molecules called buckyballs pushes quantum reality into the macroscopic world. In an exciting extension of this work — proposed by Roger Penrose, the renowned Oxford physicist — not just light, but a small mirror that reflects it, becomes part of an entangled quantum system, one that’s billions of times larger than a buckyball. If the proposed experiment confirms Penrose’s idea, it would furnish the most powerful evidence that biocentrism — that is, the biocentric view of the universe — is correct at the level of living organisms.

https://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/world-may-be-influenced-by-the-future/

>>15460019

Part 2

Company

This latest round, for instance, represents the fourth investment directed by Bill Gates. Through his foundations, he has contributed a total of $100M to Schrödinger.

https://www.alleywatch.com/2019/01/this-nyc-startup-just-raised-85m-and-is-disrupting-the-biopharma-industry-with-technology/

Clinton

“There is a Schrödinger’s Cat aspect to classification. In other words, there is a lot of government information that is neither classified nor unclassified until somebody actually looks at it and makes a determination one way or another,” Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy, wrote in an email to FP. He was referring to the famous quantum physics thought experiment in which a cat can be simultaneously dead and alive. “The argument seems to be that [Clinton] did not knowingly or negligently mishandle classified information.”

https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/07/24/hillary-clinton-and-schrodingers-cat-what-does-it-mean-to-retroactively-classify/

https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0528/Schroedinger-s-cat-now-has-a-playmate

Meanwhile, on the conservative blog RedState, contributor Moe Lane in 2011 made fun in a headline of the Obama administration’s efforts to pass a jobs bill that had not yet been written: “Democrats: Pass the Schrödinger’s Job Bill!”

https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0902/Are-Hillary-Clinton-and-Joe-Biden-both-bitten-by-Schroedinger-s-cat

As implausible as it seems, this leads us to the possibility of the effort by Putin to ensnare the Americans is a bit like Schrodinger’s cat (with a nod to Erwin Schrodinger and Sheldon Cooper.) The results of the meeting matter little. Dirt or no dirt the Russians won. Like Schrodinger’s fictitious cat, the truth is an entanglement of a simultaneous paradox.

A short one about Hillary Clinton’s emails and Schrodinger’s Cat

I occasionally play this fun game with myself as to how Schrodinger’s cat (dead or alive or both or not) may unfold in real life. The bombshell disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director, James Comey that the agency is reviewing some more emails potentially linked to the Hillary Clinton email investigation comes reasonably close to Schrodinger’s cat in this season of harrowing uncertainty. (You have to be a true blue nerd to see how I connected Schrodinger’s cat with Werner Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle.)

https://southasia.typepad.com/south_asia_daily/2016/10/a-short-one-about-hillary-clintons-emails-and-schrodingers-cat.html

So instead, Biden is left running a Schrödinger’s cat campaign, neither wholly in the race or wholly out of it

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/joe-bidens-potential-2016-presidential-campaign/

The parallel to Schrodinger’s in the first conversation is that we know Hillary Clinton ran on a specific platform. We know the content of the leaked emails were uncontested. We don’t know for sure Russia supplied them to WikiLeaks, but even if they did, we know that doesn’t affect their authenticity. How is my first interlocutor’s reasoning not completely illogical, if not totally nonsensical?

Corruption, whether it is hidden or public, is still corruption. Like Schrodinger’s cat, we know it’s there, even though we cannot see it.

https://www.rimaregas.com/2016/11/21/dear-god-please-tell-me-this-entire-election-wasnt-about-schrodingers-cat-liberal-illogic-on-blog42/

God Made a Driver

https://www.bitchute.com/video/edYMqGNIxKQA/

>>15460378

There's an old saying

"He should be shot, pissed on, and hung up to dry"

My addition - "by the balls"

Maybe people need to understand what's going on, and see it for real