>>15463982

I don't think there is any set constitutional method for how the the individual state's determine electors. I also think having a popular vote and assigning electors according to that vote is a formality.

Basically, people voted for a state legislature which then voted for a President via electors. Similar to how Senators were chosen, except in the Senator case there were no electors necessary because the vote was immediate. Presidential electors were sent to DC to vote later.

What you have, here, then, is a muddying of the waters scenario by the dems/GOPe, gaslighting to populace to think there is only one legal way to choose electors., and/or that only one set of electors per state is possible. The end game is to convince the populace that Trump broke some Constitutional guideline to maintain power, and that would be considered an insurrection.

The dems/GOPe can stop Trump from ever becoming President again by convicting him of insurrectional behavior. Arresting him for any other crime won't matter. So, end game is to convict Trump for leading an insurrection. Always start there and then work back to figure out the current game the dems/GOPe are playing trying to accomplish that.

Trump must have had high ranking Constitutional gurus telling him what to do. He's probably legit and the dems/GOPe will walk into a trap.

>>15464242

I don't think it has anything to do with Catholicism. A lot of other religions are in the mix.

My guess is the masses coming over are at an intelligence level, for whatever reason, that needs trickery and threats of violence to be successful in the society they are entering. They're the troops that will be incited, if need be, because the US voter base solves their problems in other ways than violence.

Whatever the trio you mention are actually doing won't withstand a thorough analysis and explanation. Nothing will be there that their US citizen base will fight for.

>>15464322

Thanks, anon. Along the lines of what I was thinking. Nice to see some confirmation.

My hunch is that this is why no courts took the election fraud cases. It didn't matter if the vote was manipulated, since the state legislatures can do whatever they want.

Trump, by jacking up the visibility of the Jan 6 elector vote, opened the Overton window on this issue. Where there is going is that the populace is going to learn that their Presidential vote doesn't mean shit. The only thing with a Constitutional bite is their vote for state legislatures.

Look at the Presidential election "Industry". Campaign donations, polls, pundits, debates. It's a money-making scam. No wonder the political camp followers, like Rick Wilson, who get their bread buttered every four years are screeching.

>>15464447

Agree with what the first anon that answered said, plus, you have the issue of state legislatures changing election laws on the fly, which were also not judicated. Individual

state government officials, not the legislatures, were changing those laws, and they were upheld by the courts. Courts declaring no standing or moot are no different than ruling in favor in these cases.

Probably where the dems voter bill wanted to go. Any voting law would have been subject to arbitrary change by any individual state officials at any time. Customize the laws depending on what was necessary for the dem candidate to win.