It isn't actually eugenics if their goals and methods murder people of all ages and abilities. Genocide, perhaps, if the current depopulation pogrom can be shown to target any particular people.
I think the most accurate term is mass murder.
You're correct, anon. We don't need more laws restricting our freedom of speech. What might be helpful is to pass a law specifically protecting an individual's right to respond to any invasive question with "None of your business," without fear of retribution.
IF any of these evil pharma corps are ever hauled up on charges, I want to see the "corporate veil" ripped asunder, and every decision-making authority figure who participated in executing millions of humans for profit needs to be individually charged with accessory to mass murder (or whatever charges are fitting to their roles).
Anon, have you not been paying attention? When has a CV test ever helped anyone? Unless the person WANTED to be confined to quarters or strapped to their hospital bed and isolated from family and friends… No, the fake CV tests didn't help anyone. 10 million of them sitting in the rain is criminal-level pollution, but not any kind of denial of help to anyone.
Amazing Polly and Corey's Digs are two worthwhile places to reacquaint your "professional family" with critical thinking. BTW, what's a "professional family"? Do they get paid for being family members? If so, how does one score a sinecure like that?
Have to respond to the final trips of truth (999):
I can attest that lower-level government appointees who serve the public directly generally must post a surety bond. The point is to protect the public from any mistakes or malfeasance the official might commit. The required amount of the bond varies depending on how much harm the official might be able to cause the public.
I served for a while as a Notary Public. I served proudly because Notaries Public serve without pay except for piecework pay for each document certified. The bond protects anyone who is a party to a document which a Notary Public mistakenly of falsely certifies.
Officials who must post surety bonds also (if they're smart) take out insurance policies to cover themselves in case of a mistake. These policies are called "errors and omissions" policies.
I can add that lower-level government civil servants generally do NOT post surety bonds, and the responsibility for their mistakes or malfeasance rises up all the way to the POTUS or Congress. This system guarantees that our civil servants cannot be effectively help accountable for their actions. The system was designed that way.
>effectively help accountable
autocorrect is idiotic. "help" was typed originally as "held".
If that were their main target, they sure have a high tolerance for collateral damage and civilian casualties. Seems like a messy approach, guaranteed to breed more enemies and fewer allies. Kinda like most of the NWO-controlled US Mil actions for the last 50 years.
I was just ribbing you about "professional family," anon. As a truck driver, broke-down or otherwise, you're a vertebrae in the backbone of America. Much respect to you.
Notablebut needs link to sauce - probably Catherine Herridge, but posting anon should add a link.
>A New Jersey-based Democratic political consultant today admitted hiring two men to kill a longtime associate who had worked for him on various political campaigns
Seconded asNotable
Also perhaps worthy of a dig?
It's a slippery slope when motives are assumed or posited without proof or evidence. If a FOIA release supports the stated motive, then it's notable. There's just so MUCH opining rather than reporting in the news, it's good to examine the reports for facts versus opinions.
The vote was in a committee, which forwarded the bill to yet another committee. The chairman of the receiving committee posted (Twitter, I think? Anon posted it in PB) that he would never let it go to a full vote. So, it's a statement, from a committee within a legislature. It hasn't become law and most likely won't. While interesting, it's not as earthshaking as we might hope.
I'm fine with accurately reported information. The headline on GP is misleading, stating that the Assembly voted on this; it didn't. Only a committee has voted on it at this point.
NotableLinux vulnerability discovered and exploited - likely present in all current distros
This post implies that there's just one bond company for all officials of a given type(the post uses sheriffs). There are many bond companies, and the official usually has the choice which company to use. So, Step 5 in the process being promoted will NOT work for all officials, nor in all states.
Example: Notaries Public are a county-level office, and the county recorder's office handles records of all the bonds for Notaries Public within that county.
NotableJes Staley pressed JPMorgan to keep Jeffrey Epstein as client
Hope this makes Last Call
For the moment, it just means GP is publishing hype. Past bread, otheranon posted the actual factual status of this bill. It's still a bill, in an early stage, and definitely not going to be voted on by the full assembly right away. Maybe someday, if we're lucky. It's a baby step, but not earthshaking.