Anonymous ID: dc5cf6 May 26, 2018, 3:58 a.m. No.1546877   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7346

>>1546864

True.

Anon showed Q a side-by-side with the wrong connections.

Q replied. "Fake".

Doesn't say anything about BC17.

But:

BC17 abruptly closing shop, tells me that there is something fishy.

BTW, Q not showing up, doesn't further my trust in "the plan" either.

Why start something and then don't care about your audience?

Anonymous ID: dc5cf6 May 26, 2018, 4:34 a.m. No.1546982   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6987 >>6988 >>7009

>>1546945

They didn't "imply" a relationship with Q.

This is not about, who you or I "follow".

This is only about people saying that BC17 claimed or "implied" to be Q or to be "related" to Q.

BC17 didn't do that.

I'm reading and listening to whomever I want to and don't let an anonymous source tell me whom to listen to and whom not to listen to.

Talking about Q, why isn't he showing up?

Did he lose interest in his own project?

Anonymous ID: dc5cf6 May 26, 2018, 4:45 a.m. No.1547023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7027 >>7059 >>7087 >>7123

>>1547009

I hope, you're well too.

I'm not angry. Q not showing up, might be part of their plan. But I think, it is a bad plan, to start something and to not follow up on the expectations, you raised.

Trump telling the world that the negotiations with Kim are stopped, Kim then telling the word that he wants to keep up negotiating is huge.

Q not showing up is not furthering trust.

Anonymous ID: dc5cf6 May 26, 2018, 5:02 a.m. No.1547089   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7096 >>7104 >>7156

>>1547059

> I think your just frustrated because …

Thank you, for your reply.

No, I'm not frustrated.

I'm an adult.

What I'm doing here is criticising Q's modi operandi, because I wouldn't act like them.

If I were interested in giving info to an audience, I would show up more regularly and treat my audience with some respect.

I lived before Q and I will live without Q, when Q's time is over.

But I'll never will just "applaud" or excuse, what Q is doing or not doing.

Anonymous ID: dc5cf6 May 26, 2018, 5:05 a.m. No.1547101   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7126 >>7146

>>1547087

>sorry if you think it's a bad plan

I'm not talking about the plan.

I've been replying to an Anon, who said that Q not showing up, is a part of the plan.

This "not showing up", if it were part of the plan, is what I call a bad idea.