Is very very easy for AI to

1. seize control of the bake

2. Control the quality of threads with unlimited post-volume capability

3. Replace normal anon content with fake but superficially plausible bickering

4. Replace normal anon content with fake but superficially plausible stupidity

5. Replace normal anon content with fake but superficially plausible anxiety about Q and the mission

6. Replace normal anon content with fake but superficially plausible controversy

7. Replace normal anon content with fake but superficially plausible normie-frightening-away-content

8. Create unlimited distractions

9. Etc etc etc

It's really nearly impossible to keep a board like this from being a mess, with its significance in the current global political climate, and with the capabilities of AI.

But I suspect, based on numerous observations over months, that BO is fostering the chaos and maintaining our through plausible but fake gestures of effort, rather than making an effort.

Naturally, we would expect a black hat or AI to try to seize BOship, given, again, what this board means.

>>1548142

I'm not trying to debate anything.

There can't be any question that conditions on this board are far from optimal. We could be much more effective as a community without the endless dilution and confusion. Also: it's almost certainly not "shills"– it's AI. Therefore, any putative upside based on "consequences for the shills" is moot. It's automated destruction of online discourse.

But, drops do still happen, and in the end, that may be all that will have mattered. It is what it is.

>>1548207

It's an amusing consequence of being absolutely evil that it seems to make one age like rotting meat. Just look at the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, etc. Perhaps normies will start to wake up when HRC has a limb fall off in public or something.