I thought so too anon on 1st examination. Yet the anon who posted that graphic (which implied outside comms), it wasn't the 1st time that they posted. They continued posting looking for a reply from anons and Q, and eventually got it. So having already dismissed the graphic for myself, I had to ask, was the BC17 account as a whole being called fake, or was the obviously fake graphic being called fake?
There's no cure for insecurity on this board, I suppose.
Digits^ wasted
>Question everything
was/is not a euphemism. Not agreeing with every anon on the board =/= shill. Thinking for myself is a habit that won't die, and I'm too old to fall for peer pressure. If the consensus says A, and I ask B, does that REALLY make me a shill, or am I only expanding thinking beyond the consensus? Again, my logical questions still stand, call me what you like. No feels here.
Niggers come in all shapes sizes and skin colors. Just as patriots have no skin color, ignorant monkeys have no skin color. Be careful that you're not projecting.
Here's the thing anon, I never once said that BC17's "intel" was good. I don't know their intentions, nor what goals they were looking to achieve with that account. I simply looked deeper than the surface to ask a question that should be asked,instead of waiting on Q to elaborate. "Is the account fake, as well as the graphic Q replied to?" is a fair question. Again, that's not me looking to legitimize BC17, it's asking a question that wasn't being asked. Expanded thinking leads to asking questions. not definite answers that shouldn't be questioned. This board is not a dictatorship, nor it is ruled by consensus (that would make it a…gulp…democracy).
I'd never ask anyone to check them out. I would encourage re_reading the crumb and questioning what Q meant, as opposed to what anons SAY that Q meant.
Where are the autists?!?!
Where are the autists?!?!
Where are the autists?!?!
Korean leaders meet in surprise summit
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44265287
Vladimir Putin says Russia is being held ‘hostage’ to President Trump’s political scandals
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/putin-russia-held-hostage-trump-scandals-article-1.4010034
>You need to read Q's statement in context
Precisely! The graphic was fake bc it implied private comms to initiate the twitter account. That was bullshit, the account may or may not be bullshit.