Anonymous ID: cc7a1b Jan. 27, 2022, 2:16 p.m. No.15477699   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7867 >>8075

Racism From The View: Panel Accuses Clarence Thomas of Being a Race Traitor, ‘He Doesn’t Represent the Black Community’

 

Just another day of racism and bigotry from the co-hosts on The View.

 

The cackling hens on The View attacked Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett.

 

Joy Behar accused Clarence Thomas of being a race traitor and then accused ACB of being a traitor to women.

 

“He’s [Thomas] to the right of Attila the Hun … they put him in there thinking, oh, a black man will go against voting rights, which he does,” Joy Behar said.

 

“There’s only been two black men” in the history of the court – Sara Haines said.

 

Sunny Hostin responded by saying: “And one doesn’t really represent the black community.”

 

Video via NewsBusters:

 

Clarence Thomas said it perfectly: “We know what this is all about. This is the wrong BLACK GUY, he has to be destroyed. Just say it.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/racism-view-panel-accuses-clarence-thomas-race-traitor-doesnt-represent-black-community-video/

Anonymous ID: cc7a1b Jan. 27, 2022, 3:07 p.m. No.15478050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8132

China Began Subjecting American Diplomats To Anal COVID-19 Tests Right After Biden Was Inaugurated.

 

The Chinese Communist Party made American diplomats take anal COVID-19 tests, emails obtained via the Freedom of Information Act by Judicial Watch reveal.

 

A string of emails exchanged in late January 2021, just days after Joe Biden was sworn in, show that U.S. State Department officials were being subjected to anal COVID-19 tests while in China.

 

In a January 22nd, 2021 email titled “New Testing Method,” a State Department official explains how a colleague was administered an anal COVID-19 test:

 

“So a colleague [REDACTED] was telling our group [REDACTED] that he was given an anal COVID swab at his apartment. Just a heads up, as I am sure it is going to blow up soon… if you aren’t already dealing with it. Employee’s name is [REDACTED]. Just getting ahead before the word of mouth starts spreading.”

 

A separate response to the email shows a State Department official inquiring for details about the lead-up to the test.

 

“In what city did this occur? And what number test? And did he say if they gave any notice beforehand that the test would be conducted in this manner? And was he presented with options,” asked the officials whose name has been redacted.

 

A subsequent email reveal the anal COVID-19 test took place in Beijing and that the official was given “no notice or options”:

 

-Beijing

 

-He is in his apartment as part of the +7 (from my understanding)

 

-No notice or options as I can tell

 

-He had to do both a nose and anal swab.

 

Additional emails obtained by Judicial Watch appear to show various State Department officials panicking about the potential requirement of COVID-19 tests.

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/01/27/china-forced-american-diplomats-to-take-anal-covid-tests/

Anonymous ID: cc7a1b Jan. 27, 2022, 3:22 p.m. No.15478145   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Itajaí, Brazil Citywide Prevention Program using Ivermectin Significantly Reduced COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality Rate

 

A citywide prevention program using ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajai, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina between July 2020 and December 2020.

 

In early July, the city mayor of Itajai, Dr. Volnei Jose Morastoni announced a citywide use of Ivermectin against COVID-19. The mayor distributed Ivermectin kits totaling 1.5 million tablets to the residents of Itajai. The study of this program was published on NIH website.

 

According to this comprehensive study, the regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates. The ivermectin non-users were two times more likely to die of COVID-19 than ivermectin users in the overall population analysis.

 

Read the summary of the study:

 

Materials and methods: We analyzed data from a prospective, observational study of the citywide COVID-19 prevention with ivermectin program, which was conducted between July 2020 and December 2020 in Itajai, Brazil. Study design, institutional review board approval, and analysis of registry data occurred after completion of the program. The program consisted of inviting the entire population of Itajai to a medical visit to enroll in the program and to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as an optional treatment to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day. In cases where a participating citizen of Itajai became ill with COVID-19, they were recommended not to use ivermectin or any other medication in early outpatient treatment. Clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalization, and death were automatically reported and entered into the registry in real time. Study analysis consisted of comparing ivermectin users with non-users using cohorts of infected patients propensity score-matched by age, sex, and comorbidities. COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were analyzed with and without the use of propensity score matching (PSM).

 

Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajai considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3% of the population above 18 years old) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajai (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajai) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001). Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765582/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/itajai-brazil-citywide-prevention-program-using-ivermectin-significantly-reduced-covid-19-infection-hospitalization-mortality-rate/