>15483606

>Isn't that something highly evolved psychopathic sociopaths would say in one breath and in the second claim that its ok to not have children?

Ideas rise and fall on their merits. Anyone can say anything. Unmasking the background of the authors never was and never will be rational grounds to prove or disprove any idea.

>You seem to be underestimating the length that natural selection is prepared to go to sustain its most favorable phenotype.

Not at all. I do not under-estimate a multi-generational set of 'bloodlines' who literally drug, rape and ritually kill children, and doing so without punishment because they infiltrated the very institutions designed to protect and defend the people who pay taxes to support the existence of those institutions.

>You keep saying the word "zero sum game" as if its some kind of mantra.

If saying a phrase three times constitutes a 'mantra', then YOU using "race" over and over and over again must itself be a 'mantra' according to your own definition.

See how that works?

Why is it that the adherents of the [death cult ideology] (call it whatever you want, Q hinted at another term, by citing an anon who cited "Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung").

It's not a refutation of the existence of an object by smearing the reference code used as being a 'mantra', by the way.

>Is there a zero sum game amongst the viruses when they evolve and adapt a resistance? What makes the covid virus so much more different from the humans? Not much in terms of natural selection.

This is just another manufactured ideology that denies human rationalism and views humans as brainless viruses.

Human consciousness is a point of departure from not only viruses, but all other animals on this planet. Humans are unique and yes we are extremely special.

>Are you sure that those that jumped off from it haven't done so to justify their own ideology?

I am saying the same ancient pre-enlightenment ideology that viewed humans as primarily of 'groups', the small number (relatively) who adhere to that today have used 'natural selection' (which you are also using a 'mantra' by your own definition, by the way) to excuse their theology as 'scientifically' legitimate.

>Surely after all, its quite common for cults and religions to oppose evolution in different ways?

But you're begging the question still. Evolution by natural selection has not been demonstrated as consistent with the other mantra you're using of "race".

There is only one logic, and there is only one set of logical categories for all humans worldwide.

>Why would the liberal imperialist be so much more different from say, mormons in its anti-science doctrine?

I'm not taking about 'liberal imperialism'.

I'm talking about what you're smearing as a 'mantra'.

Ritual torture and killing of children in worship of 'the beast' persona for one. Shall I go on?

>Why is "Eternal equality" so much more sacred than "eternal intelligent design"?

I don't recall making the claim.

>>15483994

>>15483606 (/lb)

>Seems more to me that there are political interests involved here in denying reality for what it is.

But that's just the same underlying collectivist ideology used to 'explain' everything. It's begging the question. It was never proved that an individual's actions MUST be only the 'interest' of a class, or race.

>To be honest, the way people say "social construct" or as you say "human construct" is quite conveniently used when it fits the liberal imperialist agenda. No, to me, it seems more like those that deny evolution in some way are either severely brainwashed or simply deceitful psychopaths.

Then why does the death cult network rely on deception, if it is 'scientifically legit'? Seems to me that the fact deception is a requirement is proof its ideology is illegitimate.

I am not denying evolution by natural selection.

Notice how you have shifted this to having to defend or critique Darwin's theory, while the ORIGINAL topic was the ancient 'mantra' ideology that predates Darwin by thousands of years?

>Well, so do I. But some statistical observations about the expected value for certain races just simply cannot be ignored.

Ah but 'valuation' is a subjective human action in a world of scarcity vis a vis 'infinite' potential of human wants, needs and intelligence advancement.

If you want to claim some "races" of people are more or less "valuable" than others, and you do so by pointing to what we see, then I will reply and say that the same death cult has INTENTIONALLY impoverished and enriched people worldwide based on race (think Rothschild 'fiat' money 'currencies' and different rates of inflation of the money supplies, think infiltrated 'political' trade policies, etc), to create a 'narrative' that you are now claiming has its own justification based on empirical 'statistics' that just begs the question again.

I reject the view that the reason say Africa is relatively impoverished has any bearing on how God created us all. I see it as a manufactured impoverishment to divide people by race, and economic 'class'.

>>15483606 (/lb)

>Although, I would wish we could have a communication where we trusted each other without such malign suspicion.

You started it when you accused me of lying to myself when you smeared my posts as being sourced from outside of me and rather from "race" instead of from ME as an individual.

>It might also be that you interpreted it that way since you have committed to the fact that I am evil and out after to deceive you.

You're projecting again. I quite clearly have since the start been critiquing and discussing IDEAS.

You personally I don't know, but I can criticize your ideas as 'evil' defined as not only sanctioning but claiming as the only real truth, for humans to be justified in slaughtering children and for racial wars to take place that kill people, because of originally a hatred of God and more recently excused by 'muh natural selection' mantra.

>Which is a shame. Perhaps you are missing something in what I am saying? Or maybe I didn't say my true intention properly? Either way, it shouldn't be necessary for you to always conclude the worst possible and to claim the perfect opposite in every post. You know, by claiming the opposite all the time you just prepare the bed for war.

You mean like how you're assuming the worst in people based on their race?!?!

>>ritualistic death cult ideology

>You keep saying that phrase and it seems to me like this is some similar mantra to the "zero sum" phrase being repeated. My council to you is to not subject people to your worst judgement when they are ready to carefully spend their time writing their genuine and honest thoughts with such effort as this post has been made. Feel free to reject what I say, but please do not frivolously call me dishonest. If you do that you might punish those that actually put effort in replying seriously to what you think.

Take your own advice in how you 'value' people based on their race, and THEN come back here and criticize Anons for 'making assumptions' about other people. Then your proselytizing and 'guidance' will be taken seriously by me.

>>15484050

This statement that anon made:

>You know, by claiming the opposite all the time you just prepare the bed for war.

This to me is that anon's psychological projection of his/her own deterministic war mongering of:

"accept our ancient irrational view that it is justified for there to be a war on children based on race, to be drugged, raped and ritually killed because 'muh natural selection', and we use deception, blackmail and murder to keep truth away from the all the people 'hunted'"

If anyone with THAT view were to then say to me:

"if you keep persisting in stating the 'opposite' to this then you are just preparing the bed for war"

Then I will say it wouldn't be me who started the war, it wouldn't be me who is causing any war. The war came to me and my children and everyone else's children from those who practise an ancient ideology that denies the individuality of humans and seeks to destroy and kill for profit and power.

That evil has no place in this world.

We're all going to die anyway, so death threats won't work on me.

>>15484090

Is this supposed to be a deflection from the truth of real SRA?

If so:

>>15484248

Except this country (America) is leading the dismantling of the Old Guard that ritually kills the 'bodies' of children.

It's not ONLY 'for country', it's to save the human race from a malevolent evil network of psychopaths calling themselves 'evolved' beyond the rest of humanity.

It's just an old pre-enlightenment theology masquerading as 'scientific'.

>>15484315

It was always going to be a marathon, because the ultimate source of why we 'see' the actions we're seeing, is because its rooted in a very long but nevertheless destructive intellectual and spiritual poisoning of consciousnesses worldwide under a cover of deception, having infiltrated power positions of government and media entities worldwide.

It's truly remarkable how much progress has already been made in just a few short years of information DISCLOSURE.

It also reveals just how rickety and shaky the satanic cult's power really is, when mere information disclosure, from dark to light, is enough to drastically change the course of history.

Also, just imagine if the white hats didn't 'unrig' the 2016 election. Just imagine if HRC had won.

Hell on Earth.

>>15484370

That's all laundered US taxpayer money.