>>15484417 (/lb)
1/2
You're asking for another easy refutation of the flawed ideas you've been posting?
kek, ok then!
>>You mean like how you're assuming the worst in people based on their race?!?!
>You need to learn the difference between the words "Assuming" and "Expecting". I'm not assuming anything, other than that reason will govern you.
That isn't true, because you clearly 'assumed' that the 'value' of people is determined by and can be 'statistically' confirmed according to dividing people by "race".
>>…children and for racial wars to take place that kill people, because of originally a hatred of God and more recently excused by 'muh natural selection' mantra.
>Did you learn the word mantra now?
Did you learn 'death cult ideology' and 'zero sum game' just now?
You accusing Anon of using words as 'mantras' is contradicted by your own repeated use of the phrases "race" and "natural selection".
>See, you are already learning things this is good progress.
You're projecting your own experience of being educated by me as I am teaching you how the world has advanced since the enlightenment discoveries.
It's ok, if that offends your delicate ego, well, growing pains are called growing pains for a reason.
You have displayed some modicum of potential, but you still have some ways to go.
Maybe you have the disadvantage of genetic inbreeding in your family tree, or maybe you have been traumatized where proselytizing about the justification of tyrannical dominance placates the anxiety of inferiority complex you are experiencing as being so low in the 'elite' totem pole that the only usefulness they could get out of you is to shill on this board, or maybe you're just brainwashed and suffering from Dunning-Kruger and unable at this time to comprehend your own ignorance, or maybe it's something else.
Whatever the reason, it doesn't really look all that good on the 'elitism' of your posts given you're posting them here instead of some prestigious academic journal.
>Now you only need to learn how mutations work as well. Evolutionary psychology undermines (just like evolution always does) many cult-like movements, and since it undermines liberal imperialism it kind of suggests that the leftists today are suffering under some kind of hypnosis.
Which was by design of the controllers of the narrative the 'left' is 'supposed' to repeat….as mantras, kek.
The fundamental flaw in your approach is that you're conflating information, memes, and the logical connections there, which are proximately sourced by emergent phenomena, with the 'components', the molecules and atoms of the human body.
Speaking of 'cults', the ideology you're pushing here is the very acme of cult like thinking. It's just a cult like denial of enlightenment and mantra spewing devotion to what can be summarized as 'might makes right'
>Similar to the one delusion that boomers are suffering from when they tell people "to work harder" in order to make more money.
Except that's true, it's not a delusion.
Working to improve one's intelligence for example can make one's actions more valuable to others such that will make more money in exchange.
The denial of this truth is used to excuse government control of economies, socialism.
>Or the way creationists are delusional about how resistant bacteria exists. Also, that slaughter stuff you talked about sounded pretty crazy. You are probably mistaking me for someone else, which is fine.
If it sounds crazy to you, you're just admitting that the ideology you're pushing is crazy.