>>15486198

Tyb

Stephen Miller

@StephenM

BREAKING:America First Legal is SUING the Biden Administration to halt its radical plan to fly the foreign relatives of illegal aliens into the United States. We are serving as Outside Counsel to a coalition of eight states led by the heroic @KenPaxtonTX

:

https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/1487144668517351426

America First Legal, Texas and State Coalition Join Forces to Sue Biden Over Illegal Alien Resettlement

Friday, January 28, 2022

WASHINGTON, DC – – Today, America First Legal, serving as outside counsel for the State of Texas, sued the Biden Administration on behalf of a coalition of states–Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Alaska–over the Biden Administration’s implementation of an unlawful program to bring the relatives of illegal aliens into the United States: the Central American Minors (CAM) Program.

The CAM Program–which Congress did not create–establishes a program whereby an illegal alien in the United States can request to have their family members join them here–in other words, a program of unlawful chain migration. Because of this program, potentially hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens living in the United States are now eligible to formally petition to have the U.S. government allow their relatives to come join them here. Eligible illegal aliens in the United States include those who entered unlawfully and merely filed an asylum application as recently as May 15, 2021. Meaning, not only did the Biden Administration’s policies actively facilitate widespread illegal entries by illegal aliens in early 2021, but they are now actively rewarding their unlawful behavior by allowing them to apply to have their family members join them in the United States.

This is a scenario never envisioned by Congress. It’s a disastrous program to implement in the middle of an unprecedented border crisis. And it betrays those American citizens and their family members who abide by the laws established by Congress to bring their relatives to the United States.

AFL is proud to partner with these patriotic states to fight back against this unlawful, unprecedented attack on American sovereignty.

Statement from America First Legal President Stephen Miller:

“America First Legal is truly proud to be serving as outside counsel to the State of Texas, and to partner with a coalition of eight courageous States suing the Biden Administration to shut down one of its most outrageous and lawless assaults on American sovereignty. President Biden has launched a program allowing illegal aliens to petition the U.S. government to have their foreign relatives join them here in the United States. It’s a massive government airlift operation for illegal aliens’ relatives living abroad. This lawless madness must be stopped — and we are fighting to stop it. Thank you to the great Attorney General Paxton, and the seven other brave Attorneys General, for partnering with us in this vital endeavor,” Stephen Miller said.

Read the complaint here.

To schedule an engagement with America First Legal, please email info@athospr.com.

https://www.aflegal.org/news/america-first-legal-texas-and-state-coalition-join-forces-to-sue-biden-over-illegal-alien-resettlement

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

BIG news out of Pennsylvania!

The practice of no-excuse mail-in ballots, put in place by Democrats right before the stolen 2020 Election, has been ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court.

Here is the key question: If widespread mail-in balloting is unconstitutional in Pennsylvania now, how could mail-in balloting have been constitutional in the RIGGED 2020 Presidential Election then?

We all know the answer—it wasn’t!

All American Patriots are thanking the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania for having the courage to do the right thing!

https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1487193321076404225

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible. Make America Great Again!

ICYMI: "Court ruling puts mail-in voting on hold in Pennsylvania"

https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1487074903396388875

Court ruling puts mail-in voting on hold in Pennsylvania

Friday's Commonwealth Court opinion declares Act 77 of 2019 unconstitutional, though an appeal is expected by the Department of State.

Author: FOX43 Newsroom, Associated Press, Amy Lutz (FOX43), Matt Maisel (FOX43)

Published: 8:55 AM EST January 28, 2022

Updated: 5:25 PM EST January 28, 2022

PENNSYLVANIA, USA — A statewide court says Pennsylvania’s expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans who soured on mail-in voting after then-President Donald Trump began baselessly attacking it as rife with fraud in 2020′s campaign.

According to a Commonwealth Court filing released Friday, the court ruled that Act 77, allowing residents to vote by mail in Pennsylvania, violates Article VII, Section 1 of the Pennsylvania constitution.

The Commonwealth Court denied the Pa. Department of State acting secretary's application for summary relief.

In the ruling, Commonwealth Court President Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt wrote, "If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation allowing no-excuse mail-in voting can be 'placed upon our statute books.'"

Friday's decision by a five-judge Commonwealth Court panel could be put on hold immediately by an appeal from Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration to the state Supreme Court.

The decision throws the state’s voting laws into doubt in a big election year.

The three Republican judges agreed with Republican challengers. The two Democrats on the panel dissented.

Governor Wolf said his administration would immediately appeal the decision, in the hopes the Supreme Court would issue a stay, thus halting the lower court's decision.

“The Republican-controlled legislature passed Act 77 with strong bipartisan support in 2019 to make voting more safe, secure, and accessible and millions of Pennsylvanians have embraced it. The simple fact is that despite near-unanimous Republican legislative support for this historic update to Pennsylvania election law, they now want to strip away mail-in voting in the service of the “big lie”, Wolf said in a statement.

>>15486446

Act 77, the Pennsylvania law which legalized no-excuse mail-in voting in 2019, was originally born out of a compromise between legislative Republicans and Democratic Governor Tom Wolf. Republicans wanted to eliminate straight-ticket voting, and to do so, gave mail-in voting to Democrats. Prior to this, only people who qualified for absentee voting were allowed to vote by mail.

Republicans voted in near unanimity for Act 77; 27-0 in the Senate, and 105-2 in the House. Democrats offered no support in the Senate, and were split in the lower chamber, 59 against, 33 for.

However, like many things, the COVID-19 pandemic changed everything.

Mail-in ballots cast by people weary to visit crowded polling places during the height of the pandemic overwhelmed election offices during the June 2020 primary election. When November general election came up, more than 2.6 million votes cast for President, more a third of all votes, were by mail. Among that number, two of every three mail-in voters, more than one million total, were registered Democrats.

Joe Biden won the election over Donald Trump by 80,000 votes.

Following the election, some Republicans wrote legislation calling for the repeal of Act 77, claiming no-excuse mail-in voting violates the constitution. Only voters who qualify for absentee voting are allowed to vote by mail, many claimed. Changes to the election code must be done, they said, through a constitutional amendment, where the proposal passes through the House and Senate on two consecutive sessions with the same language before it is approved by voters.

Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, while not among the petitioners to the case, applauded the Commonwealth Court's decision.

"I have no confidence in the no-excuse mail in ballot provisions," he said. "There is no doubt that we need a stronger election law than the one we have in place today."

Corman said Act 77 led to a "double-standard" in eliminating security features which he says turned into security issues during the 2020 and 2021 elections.

The state Supreme Court holds a 5-2 Democratic majority.

You can read the full Commonwealth Court opinion below:

https://www.fox43.com/article/news/politics/elections/mail-in-voting-elections-pennsylvania/521-216f4c12-a9cb-448f-8a7d-88ec06412b0a

US will soon deploy troops to Eastern Europe and NATO countries - Joe Biden

finding sauce

>>15486462

Election Wizard Flag of United States

@ElectionWiz

·

4m

JUST IN:"I will be moving US troops to Eastern Europe in NATO countries in the near term," President Biden says this evening when asked about a timeline for moving troops. There are 8,500 US troops on alert to possibly be sent to Europe.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1487207107594264585

Court Strikes Down Pennsylvania’s ‘Unconstitutional’ Universal Vote-By-Mail Law.

A Pennsylvania court ruled that a state law allowing for universal vote-by-mail was unconstitutional.

A January 28th opinion by Judge Mary Leavitt explains why the court struck down Act 77, which allowed all Pennsylvanians to vote via mail-in-ballots during elections.

“As we witnessed in 2020, Act 77 in its current form is susceptible to unconstitutional changes that weaken its election security safeguards. The state Supreme Court unilaterally extended the deadline for mailed ballots to be received and mandated that mail-in ballots lacking a verified signature be accepted. Additionally, the State Department encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained disqualifying defects; thereby enabling voters to cure said defects,” explains State Senator Doug Mastriano.

Representative Timothy R. Bonner and 13 members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives filed a petition for review seeking a declaration that Act 77 of “violates the Pennsylvania Constitution and is, therefore, void,” according to the opinion.

The petitioners also assert that Act 77 violates the United States Constitution, and as a result, “seek an injunction prohibiting the distribution, collection, and counting of no-excuse mail-in ballots in future state and federal elections.”

“As past and likely future candidates for office, Petitioners have been or will be impacted by dilution of votes in every election in which improper mail-in ballots are counted,” the representatives argued.

“Act 77 is declared unconstitutional and void ab initio,” concludes the opinion.

The decision follows Pennsylvania experiencing unprecedented levels of voting irregularities and anomalies during the 2020 election, which were overseen by the state’s Democratic leadership.

In Philadelphia, for example, the likelihood of the city’s voting outcome is as likely as someone flipping a coin 100 times and landing on heads every time.

Per data provided by the state of Pennsylvania, an exorbitant number of individuals cast ballots, only voting for the president. Analysis reveals this phenomenon occurred exponentially more with Biden voters.

“Another way to track down fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting. When manufacturing votes, it is too time consuming to vote for other office holders,” the report notes.

For example, the number was more than double in Arizona and, at maximum, more than triple in Michigan.

In Pennsylvania, it was slightly less than half

Read:

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/01/28/pennsylvania-court-rules-universal-vote-by-mail-unconstitutional/

Arizona introduces bill to make #Bitcoin legal tender.

https://twitter.com/Dennis_Porter_/status/1487128784595652609

https://apps.azleg.gov/BillStatus/BillOverview/77255

General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Just watch the add!

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/ron-desantis-fauci

Louder With Crowder

Ron DeSantis Releases Scorching New Ad Guaranteed to Cause Another Fauci Meltdown

Brutal.

https://t.me/s/RealGenFlynn

John McCormick

@McCormickJohn

Dr. Fauci is the central character in this new @GovRonDeSantis

60-second campaign ad that first aired at 0649 today on OAN.

https://twitter.com/McCormickJohn/status/1486040612000391170

Why The Wall Street Journal Is Wrong About The 2020 Election

The problem is not ‘mass voter fraud,’ but a privately funded ‘shadow campaign’ for Joe Biden within the formal structure of the election system.

A Wall Street Journal editorial appeared on Tuesday entitled, “The Best Summary of the 2020 Election: Rules were bent, GOP voters defected, and real fraud hasn’t turned up.” This conveys the position of many establishment conservatives concerning the 2020 election: There were some slight “problems” with the election that were overshadowed by normal political phenomena such as controversies about Donald Trump and GOP voters switching sides.

The Wall Street Journal begins with the expected anti-Trump admonishment: “At his first big political rally of 2022, President Trump was again focused on 2020. ‘We had a rigged election, and the proof is all over the place,’ [Trump] said. “But Mr. Trump was apparently too busy over Christmas to read a 136-page report by a conservative group in Wisconsin, whose review shows ‘no evidence of widespread voter fraud.’”

This is a lengthy report into allegations of literal “voter fraud” by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), for which they find little corroboration. But there is another side of the argument regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election that The Wall Street Journal has relentlessly ignored.

The hypothesis is that a deeply corrupted corporate media, Big Tech censorship, legally questionable intervention by the courts, and infiltration of key election offices by lavishly funded Democratic activists resulted in “heavy-handed election interference of a kind we have never seen before” that decisively “rigged” the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden.

The WSJ editorial board would know this if they had read this, this, this, this, this, this, or our work on the role of Big Tech money in Wisconsin’s 2020 election. All of these studies present indisputable evidence of a “rigged election” in Wisconsin and in other key swing states, where the highly partisan distribution of big Center for Tech and Civic Life money, and obvious election interference by CTCL-funded election offices, was more than sufficient to flip those states toward Biden.

Stop Chasing Red Herrings

The WSJ then opines “the stolen-election theory doesn’t hold up [according to the WILL Report]. President Biden won Wisconsin by 20,682 votes, and mass fraud would likely have resulted in some discernible anomaly.” But this is a perfect example of the “red herring” fallacy. The problem is not “mass voter fraud,” but a very “discernible anomaly” involving a highly coordinated and privately funded “shadow campaign” for Biden that took place within the formal structure of the election system.

By injecting more than $419 million of Mark Zuckerberg’s money, laundered through the CTCL and the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), the professional left presided over a targeted, historically unprecedented takeover of government election offices by demonstrably ideological activists and nonprofit organizations in key areas of these swing states. Nothing like this has happened in at least the last 150 years of American elections.

Treating CTCL spending as if it were just another example of one campaign outspending another, or the insidious role of “dark money” in the 2020 election, misses the point entirely. Big CTCL and CEIR money had nothing to do with traditional campaign finance, media buys, lobbying, or Citizens United v. FEC-related campaign finance issues.

It had to do with financing the infiltration of election offices at the city and county level by Democrat activists and using those offices as a platform to implement preferred administrative practices, voting methods, ballot harvesting efforts, and data sharing agreements, as well as to launch intensive multi-media outreach campaigns and surgically targeted, door-to-door get-out-the-vote efforts in areas heavy with Democratic voters.

In Wisconsin and other swing states, big CTCL money introduced structural bias in favor of Biden into the entire 2020 election. This involved favoring certain voters and voting practices over others and disfavoring other classes of voters and voting practices, giving CTCL’s preferred voting methods—especially no-ID absentee ballots—and “New American Majority” voters and voting methods an outsized effect on the final election results. CTCL targeted heavily Democratic jurisdictions for heavy spending, and provided little or no funding to election offices in more Republican-leaning cities and counties.

>>15486867

What’s Wrong With WILL’s Analysis

The WSJ then goes on to cite WILL’s deeply flawed estimate of CTCL’s effects on Wisconsin’s election results in an earlier, self-published study. The editors note: “A nonprofit tied to Mark Zuckerberg gave $10 million to help Wisconsin elections, mostly in five cities, a skewed distribution that WILL finds ‘troubling.’ A statistical analysis suggests it [may have] lifted Mr. Biden’s turnout by 8,000.”

The fundamental problem with WILL’s quantitative analysis is that it is entirely based on the assumption that any “anomalies” in Wisconsin were randomly distributed. They therefore derive their estimates by treating all counties in Wisconsin as if they were all equally affected by CTCL spending, when we know a priori that any such anomalies were limited to a very small set of Wisconsin’s counties, and were the result of deliberate selection of election offices to be heavily funded by the data analysts who determined where big CTCL money would go.

WILL’s estimate of the impact of CTCL activity on Wisconsin’s vote total is therefore based on an inappropriate methodology. It gives rise to the astonishing claim that “In those cities [that received CTCL funding], President Biden received approximately 41 more votes on average.”

But this is absurd on the face of it when excess Biden votes (over Hillary Clinton in 2016) in Brown, Dane, and Milwaukee counties alone were more than 83,000, only about 13,000 of which (at most) can be attributed to population growth or general statewide increases in voter turnout. Are we expected to believe that the effect of CTCL’s $4.79 million spending on Biden’s vote totals in Madison and Milwaukee was “41 votes on average (which would amount to 82 votes in total),” when between Dane (Madison) and Milwaukee counties Biden beat Trump by 364,372 votes? Obviously not.

These two counties alone were responsible for more than 15 times Biden’s margin of victory in Wisconsin, which means Trump won the vote in non-CTCL funded counties by well more than 300,000 votes.

Without CTCL involvement in Wisconsin in 2020, Wisconsin would be a solidly red state. We estimate that CTCL’s investment in seven Wisconsin counties resulted in 65,222 votes for Biden that would not have occurred in CTCL’s absence. That’s more than three times as big as the final 20,800-vote margin between Biden and Trump in 2002. That CTCL-funded election interference so obviously flipped Wisconsin for Biden in 2020 is not merely “troubling,” as WILL alleges. It is outrageous.

The merger of public election offices with partisan private funding that we witnessed in 2020 involved an unprecedented type of election interference that poses an acute threat to the perceived legitimacy of elections. It should be one of the primary focuses of election reform efforts moving forward.

Credible claims supported by growing mountains of evidence of a “rigged election” have largely been ignored by the corporate media in favor of the occasional report that seeks to exonerate an election system that radically failed in November 2020. The 2020 election was not even remotely “fair,” and mainstream conservatives should not be afraid to say so.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/28/why-the-wall-street-journal-is-wrong-about-the-2020-election/