Anonymous ID: 4e3c98 Jan. 28, 2022, 8:42 p.m. No.15488938   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWO8YImyqd4

Army Reserves train for 'worst day' scenarios in Las Vegas

>933 views | Jan 28, 2022

Notice some military vehicles in town today? Members of the Army Reserves were training at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway for a "worst day" scenario.

>ff in 3, 2, 1

Anonymous ID: 4e3c98 Jan. 28, 2022, 9:58 p.m. No.15489344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e24GnPcgsE

Why Does Russia Want Ukraine?

>464 views | Jan 28, 2022

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher.

Anonymous ID: 4e3c98 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:04 p.m. No.15489364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9372 >>9375 >>9388 >>9390

>https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1293&context=ilj

Fourth- and Fifth-Generation Warfare:

Technology and Perceptions

DR. WASEEM AHMAD QURESHI*

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………………187

INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………..188

I. FOURTH-GENERATION WARFARE (4GW)………………………………………….190

A. Asymmetric Fight Involving Nonstate Actors and Cultures ………..191

B. Mercenaries and Shadow Wars ……………………………………………..193

C. A Battle on Moral Level and Light Infantry……………………………..198

D. Information and Technology………………………………………………….202

E. Fighting 4GW ……………………………………………………………………..204

II. TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESSION AS A TOOL OF WARFARE…………………….208

III. FIFTH-GENERATION WARFARE (5GW): A BATTLE OF PERCEPTIONS ……..209

A. Fighting 5GW ……………………………………………………………………..213

IV. CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………………………………….214

ABSTRACT

The composition of warfare is changing. There is an increasing

transformation in the traditional aspects of waging a war: conventional

techniques of warfare are in decline and newer tactics and tools of warfare,

such as information warfare, asymmetric warfare, media propaganda, and

hybrid warfare, are filling the gap, blurring the lines between combatant

and noncombatant, and between wartime and peacetime. The basic

framework of modern warfare was elaborated by Carl von Clausewitz in

his magnus opus On War. He defined modern warfare between states as

  • © 2019 Dr. Waseem Ahmad Qureshi. Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan.

>30 page pdf on 4/5GW

Anonymous ID: 4e3c98 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:09 p.m. No.15489388   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15489364

>Generation Warfare

 

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generations_of_warfare

First-generation warfare refers to Ancient and Post-classical battles fought with massed manpower, using phalanx, line and column tactics with uniformed soldiers governed by the state.

Second-generation warfare is the Early modern tactics used after the invention of the rifled musket and breech-loading weapons and continuing through the development of the machine gun and indirect fire. The term second generation warfare was created by the U.S. military in 1989.

Third-generation warfare focuses on using Late modern technology-derived tactics of leveraging speed, stealth and surprise to bypass the enemy's lines and collapse their forces from the rear. Essentially, this was the end of linear warfare on a tactical level, with units seeking not simply to meet each other face to face but to outmaneuver each other to gain the greatest advantage.

Fourth-generation warfare as presented by Lind et al. is characterized by a "post-modern" return to decentralized forms of warfare, blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians due to nation states' loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.

Fifth-generation warfare is conducted primarily through non-kinetic military action, such as social engineering, misinformation, cyberattacks, along with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and fully autonomous systems. Fifth generation warfare has been described by Daniel Abbot as a war of "information and perception".[3]