>Also, where are all of those truckers gonna poop?
>They have on board shitters in a lot of those trucks. There is also a fleet of midfreedomrally refuelers
there will or should be plenty'o #FaceDiapersFull upNsheit 'n deposited in #Brandeau'sBallotBox #BiteBackBetter
<>Awesome, thank you anon!
>#Brandeau'sBallotBox #BiteBackBetter
POLITICS
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's isolation due to child testing positive for COVID-19
The Canadian Press Staff
Published Friday, January 28, 2022 12:28PM EST
OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he's isolating because one of his kids tested positive for COVID-19.
In an interview with The Canadian Press, he says he feels fine and has no symptoms.
He says he took another test this morning and it was negative, as was a previous rapid test.
He's not saying which of his three children has tested positive or how they're doing.
Trudeau revealed in a tweet Thursday that he was going into isolation for five days after finding out
Wednesday evening he'd been in contact with someone, whom he didn't identify, who had tested positive.
Trudeau says he's working from home, attending a virtual Liberal caucus retreat today;
he'll also have to participate virtually Monday when the House of Commons resumes business
after a six-week break.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/prime-minister-justin-trudeau-s-isolation-due-to-child-testing-positive-for-covid-19-1.5758589
https://archive.ph/oirk1
Why is #Brandeau's CHILD NOT IN HOSPITAL { INCARCERATION / CONCENTRATION CAMP }
and FOLLOWING COVID-19 PROTOCOLS ?!?!?
Justin Trudeau Says He's Isolating Because One Of His Kids Tested Positive For COVID-19=
He found out on January 26 that he was exposed to COVID-19.
Lisa Belmonte 13 hours ago modified 12 hours ago
This story was fact-checked >i<
After revealing that he was exposed to COVID-19 and would be isolating at home,
Justin Trudeau has now given more details about the situation and where his exposure came from.
In an interview with The Canadian Press that was released on January 28,
Trudeau mentioned that the reason why he was exposed to COVID-19
and has to isolate at his home in Ottawa is that one of his kids tested positive.
While he revealed that one of his kids has tested positive, he won't say which of his three children it is or how they're doing.
On January 27,
Trudeau announced in a tweet that he had learned the previous night that he had been exposed to COVID-19.
He took a rapid test after he found out and got a negative result.
Trudeau also said that he will be following Ottawa Public Health's rules and isolating for five days.
"I feel fine and will be working from home," Trudeau said. "Stay safe, everyone — and please get vaccinated."
Back in March 2020,
his wife Sophie Grégoire Trudeau tested positive for COVID-19 and then later in the year,
Trudeau said it was possible he had contracted the virus at that time too but he wasn't entirely sure
because he was "absolutely asymptomatic."
https://www.narcity.com/justin-trudeau-says-hes-isolating-because-one-of-his-kids-tested-positive-for-covid-19
https://archive.ph/BNX2Z
=~ LIGHT'em UPinDaWINTER !o7 ~=
>https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-winter-of-our-discontent-truckers-convoy-seeking-return-of-liberty-elicits-hope-amasses-support_4244082.html
{ https://archive.ph/t105c }
~^ dubs dub czech'T v~
>get behind the wall and screen cap the article?
<>like we used to do
whoa, is "WEEEEEE?"
Should (((you))) use an archive tool. objective is multi~plied. /picrel { easier to read the cap, yet "this is https://Qresear.ch Engine" - Pepe vonClauswitz
< page 1 of 2 >
Viewpoints
The Winter of Our Discontent: Truckers’ Convoy Seeking Return of Liberty Elicits Hope, Amasses Support
Scott Masson
January 29, 2022 Updated: January 29, 2022
Commentary
Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this sun of York
The opening lines of Shakespeare’s “Richard III” express the villainous intent of the twisted and opportunistic Duke of Gloucester, of the House of York, to seize the crown from his brother’s son and legitimate heir through deceit and treachery. Richard is one of Shakespeare’s blackest villains.
As I write, in the bleak winter conditions of Canada, a 70-kilometre convoy of trucks is descending upon Ottawa from across Canada and the United States. It has been moving inexorably for days. The spark of this conflagration is the Canadian government’s latest mandate, that truckers henceforth be double-vaxxed to be allowed across the Canada-U.S. border.
Safety is, as usual, the pretext. But recent admissions that Omicron fatality rates may be less than the seasonal flu, and that boosters cannot stem either infection or transmission of the latest variant, have prompted governments more committed to science and less to scientism—or countries with greater internal political opposition—to throw up their hands and drop their mandates.
In those countries, it may mark the beginning of a return to a culture of liberty and science. In Canada, we are not quite so progressive, yet.
We are still in a scientistic dictatorship.
And we are therefore in the midst of the winter of our discontent.
Canadians are not easily provoked to the streets. We do not protest outside in January without being sorely tried and pushed to the breaking point. It appears we have reached that point.
The most basic condition for science to operate is not only the ability to publish the truth, but, as Karl Popper rightly noted, also to publicly falsify a scientific theory. Falsification is a form of dissent. It cannot be achieved under a state of emergency if the theory is also public policy. Emergencies require action, and public consent. Mandates are the direct result of governments with emergency powers, and extended mandates directly result from governments that like their powers a bit too much.
How much? Will it be to the total destruction of liberty and science?
Witness, there is no control group for the true effect of experimental mRNA shots except those who have not complied with the mandates. And the government seems committed to mandating away that control group. It deems them political dissidents, bad actors.
It defies both logic and science, but it is in keeping with the authoritarian character of scientism. To stay “scientific,” it will manufacture consensus where there is none, until there is no dissent.
And it has led to increasingly erratic and contemptible public declarations by our politicians and the health-care bureaucracy behind them. Having fired the essential health-care workers who would not be vaccinated, creating a health-care crisis, they are now calling the truckers, whether they are vaxxed or unvaxxed—another essential service—a “fringe group,” “extremists,” and even “terrorists.” The convoy suggests that there are a LOT of them.
< page 2 of 2 >
The irony of this situation should not be lost.
Mandates are not serving public science.
Mandates are not serving public health.
Mandates are not serving the public good.
Mandates are not serving the public will.
What are they serving then?
“Science” is carrying a lot of water for special interests in Canada.
Who are they?
Over the past two years, while the politicians’ commitment to a Green New Deal has transformed the economy under lockdown conditions, and while public propaganda sponsored by Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. has collaborated with them to inflate the profits of the Screen New Deal, the conditions for science, just as those for liberty, have been placed in suspended animation.
Politics ironically got in the way of science at the very point politics cum science stepped forth in the white lab coats of its “top doctors” and the public square was replaced by the private screen.
This is true throughout the world. But unlike our American cousins, who have an established culture of dissent, Canadians’ established deference to authority, a fallacy in logic, is proving more dangerous politically and revealing itself as an appeal to the authoritarian.
A sense of desperation has crept in, and a hope of redemption.
Nobel Prize-winning author John Steinbeck, in his novel “The Winter of Our Discontent,” wrote:
When a condition or a problem becomes too great, humans have the protection of not thinking about it. But it goes inward and minces up with a lot of other things already there and what comes out is discontent and uneasiness, guilt and a compulsion to get something—anything—before it is all gone.
This, it seems, is the real cause of the convoy, and the huge popularity of the protests. It is not a protest against a single mandate; it is a larger, more desperate protest against an opportunistic and deceitful autocracy that believes too much in its right to rule with impunity. It’s clear there is no exit plan to what they call the “new normal.”
It’s easy to identify it personally with our pandemic prime minister, Justin Trudeau, our thrice-vaccinated leader, who having maligned the convoy, then declared he was going into quarantine for five days—coinciding with the arrival of the convoy—despite a negative result on a COVID test. Just to keep others safe, you understand.
But there is more than desperation in the convoy. There is hope in those whom the government has marginalized and disenfranchised. As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said in his famous speech, “I Have a Dream,” echoing Shakespeare and Steinbeck:
This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality.
The declaration of emergency must be revoked.
Spring is on the horizon.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.