>>15509097 (lbpb)
>it seems to stick in most craws тно…
How come?
Free will is a paradox to which we can't know the answer from our current perspective. Would you disagree with that statement?
>Do you believe the only thing we really have control over is how we react to our perceived and subjective experiential reality?
pretty much
> Does that mean there is no free will, or does it mean that free will also has an objective and subjective path?
I don't know. Every single thought of mine could be implanted by some entity without me having any way of knowing.
Do you believe free will exists?
Thats OK, People like me enough already
Wouldn't this also preclude any reason to ever feel bad about anything, since nothing can ever be your fault if you were to follow this line of belief?
That's a grim picture of reality you are painting here.
"Look what you made me do" huh?
What makes you believe this to be the case?
Yeah but you can always conceptualize one level of abstraction higher. Human Brain can not answer the questions "why" and "originating from what".
I don't really have that much skin in this game to love some anonymous faggot. If he were that smart, he'd understand.
Produced?
Are you referring to the "sense" that has been taken being used in production, or the human that is left behind?
And for that matter, why are we here, I mean you and me, in this forum talking, if there's no escapin the existence of a god who hates you and soul merchants who want your goods?
Blind Obedience feels wrong.
I don't come here to read copypasted bible stuff. True as it may be, this place deserves original thought. At least try to use your own terms.
In this case I must have misunderstood what you wrote in your previous post.
>love is obedient
>for no other reason than love
Where is the gap of understanding here?
Read the bible, think about it and love it or whatever, but I can't take someone's opinion terribly serious when it's clear most of the terminology used is not their own. This leads me to believe they found an existing system of belief and adopted it without ever developing a personal perspective of it.
Maybe Anons can make a living when this is all over (which is soon as I have been told) by actually trademarking the term - lord knows they earned the right.
You lack reading comprehension. I suggested nothing of the sort. Re-read, and try again.
Q should've included a paypal donation link with each post
gotta support independent content creators
IMO the true mark arrogance is replying to people without properly reading their posts, then in the same breath insulting their character. It's downright disrespectful.
Do you happen to have the image handy? Maybe I can guess the password.
>projection, another flawed personality trait
translation : "no u"
this conversation is over, you may attempt again when you have increased your experience.
Have you, as the other anon claimed, heard of pictures which have confirmed embedded data yet are missing a password to access?
This seems like a huge potential source of info
It also seems like a humongous potential waste of time
Anon is torn.
Why you gotta do me like this, there are like nine people who do this stuff. Coulda included me earlier.
I swear to your fucked up version of god, that's my only weakness
have you tried "password"
That's awesome, CoincidentalArchiveAnon. Thanks for cramming that out of the ole dusty folder for me.