Anons really need to remember the it's biblical part.
Q said there is Q, and there are anons, there is no Qanon.
Now think about what Muslims (and apparently Pope Francis) believe about Jesus. They believe He was just a man with the Word of God, not the Word of God Himself, a "placeholder" so to speak.
Notice how angry you get because I tell you you're wrong?
Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. You're wrong, don't get angry at me because of it.
>There is 'Q'. 1
>There are 'Anons'. 2
>There is no 'Qanon'. 3
>Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
>WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
>DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
>Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You seem so authentic.
Maybe you should look in the mirror. I know I'm not wrong.
Why do you assume if you don't know something nobody else does?
I know you're wrong.
My question is what do you find more important, the Truth, or you being right?
"Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony." - John 3:11
Nobody can know what you don't know right? You know all?
Notice you get angry and project onto me?
>notice you don't stfu? our conversation has been over.
Yet you keep replying. You project so much kek
If you reply to me I'm going to reply to you, it's quite simple. Unless you feel you need to get the last word and you are again just projecting onto me.
Why does my confidence in what I know anger you so much?
Yes but it's 6:20AM where I am and I'm the only one up, so I'm having a conversation with you.
Why do you feel the need to attack me personally? Why are you so threatened? You're here just like I am so couldn't I ask the same of you?