Repost from lat last bread:

It appears research papers pertaining to mask efficacy regarding covid are implementing the same circle jerk were used to seeing in MSM. While trying to find sound peer reviewed data on the actual size of SARS-Cov2 virus as it relates to the filtration capabilities of various facial coverings/masks etc. attention is drawn away from the size of the virus (.07-.09um or micron according to NIH.gov) and the “studies” or mainly, theories revolve mostly around water droplets or aerosols in the 5um to 100um range. These theories then cite other theories portraying as scientific fact but no sources can be found for conclusive evidence proving masks actually work.

Job has gone back to mandatory mask wearing while in county owned/leased businesses (issued by county administrator via memorandum) for visitors and workers alike. Facial buffs are acceptable as well as surgical masks, n95 etc.

I happen to work in a county owned building and am provided a bullshit surgical style mask that sits on the box it is not a medical device and only use to protect against common every day environmental pollutants (made in China) and the n95 is a UNIAIR SH9550 which on the box sts is only capable of filtering 95% of particles 1um and bigger (also made in China). Employer has given no direction for OSHA standards regarding time limits for wearing such a respirator/mask. So many laws are being broken and we dropped the state of emergency in august of last year.

I was looking on NIH website as well as pubMed but they all seem to be spewing out the same bullshit.

Can any anons point me in the direction of better sources of information please. I plan to present the findings at my next union meeting and need to present it in a way that normies and blindness sheep can follow but having a hard time finding a “smoking gun” per-se as the water droplet “theory” seems to easily counter my argument regardless if it has been proven or not. Also trying to find a work-around to the “even if it’s 1% effective, it’s better than no mask” bullshit excuse.

I was thinking about the harmfulness of continued use for that last argument I.E. increase viral and bacterial load of the wearer as well as increased CO2, decreased O2, decreased T-cell formation leading to weakened immune system leading to more employees being sick. But, I believe this is precisely what (((they))) are trying to accomplish with these mandates.

Maybe I should look into filing a claim on the county administrators bond as well as the commissioners.

>>15524588

I ignore the repetitive postings, haven’t cared enough to inquire about them. I could speculate but what’s the point? I put em in the rear view, and that’s only if I notice em

>>15524588

>>15524597

What’s a filter?

>>15524607

I agree anon, has-mat tech certified myself but going into union meeting and simply yelling that at a bunch of brainwashed donkey isn’t going to get me any closer to my end goal. Might as well pin Karen to me chest at that point.

>>15524657

Yeah for more than 10 years in my field, respiratory fit testing included n95 testing. The last two years I was told we are no longer fit testing n95. When we did the testing, I was told to sit a still and breath as lightly as possible (even during the phases of heavy breathing, turning face side to side, up and down, and the reading phase) as the test would fail otherwise.

>>15524692

Theater class was a bust for me, for the birds. However, this “movie” is anything but a movie. I don’t go along with their “script”, I am living my life out according to my own script. Free will and the direction of God being that script. Until I have enough saved up to own land and shelter I am shackled to this system. While I am shackled to this system I am trying my damndest to evaporate their madness.