"we" wном, exacтly?
łкцнכ
>>15525736
the amount varies
but yes
it is
improper usage
just now figuring that out,нuн.
łтянכ
checked
наruмрн
h3llo sнеер.
тнат auтнorsнip,тно.
you do not know tour enemy.
changing the mechanism of the vote is their specialty.
they will always be … well, ahead of you.
нен
you exist in as false a paradigm as a goldfish in a bowl th8nking it an sea.
you truly do not know your enemy
their patterns or their capabilities.
keep dreaming тно…
it will help feed you in your future.
you cannot see the top.
patterns and capabilities…
it is rife with assumption and delusions of truly secure digital data
you do not know your enemy.
>what is and is not acceptable speech.
this goes against everything chan is
do not make this mistake
advıce
[we] will see.
iт is an fвı ноneypoт.
ауе
pfffт