Yeah, I'm going to look into it some more. Dropping issues is not what anons do. I'm glad we see eye to eye.
Wendy should know about campaigns. She lost 4 in 4 different districts before she finally conned a district into voting for her. Geez.
The rules are:
Baker takes notables.
If anon challenges notable baker takes it out
Been that way forever.
Me thinks there is some real pushback on examining the Papi account to see if it's a LARP.
Banning notables? kek
Yeah, I'm ok. It is what it is. You can't change it by claiming it isn't true.
Notables are and should be challenged. Piss poor information because nobody looks at it but the baker is not good.
And what is all this 'You can't question Papi.'? What a load of hooey. Anons question everything.
This anon has a good perspective. I've yet to figure out 'why' Papi is notable. And this is coming from an anon who named breads after Papi and notabled Papi at least 100 times.
After the catturd proven involvement that's when I put the brakes on Papi and am working through wth is going on with it. Is it Q+ working with catturd? Is it catturd LARPING Trump? Is Q+ catturd?
Working through it…
Let me go dig the sauce out of the last bread and see what anons think of the Papi/Q+ sauce.